Lesions in DNA: Hurdles for polymerases

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 74-79

  Baynton, Kathryn ^a   Fuchs, Robert P P ^b  

^a OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b Cancerogenese Mutagenese Molec S   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL DNA; DNA POLYMERASE;

BACTERIAL GENETICS; CARCINOGENESIS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FUNGAL GENETICS; GENE MUTATION; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FUNGAL PROTEINS; HUMANS; NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 0033952567     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01524-8     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Friedberg E.C.et al. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. 1995;ASM Press.
2. Koffel-Schwartz N.et al. Cellular strategies for accommodating replication-hindering adducts in DNA: control by the SOS response in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93:1996;7805-7810.
3. Baynton K.et al. Analysis of damage tolerance pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a requirement for Rev3 DNA polymerase in translesion synthesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1998;960-966.
4. Gibbs P.E.M.et al. The frequency and accuracy of replication past a thymine-thymine cyclobutane dimer are very different in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 175:1993;2607-2612.
5. Lawrence C.W.et al. Mutagenesis induced by single UV photoproducts in E. coli and yeast. Mutat. Res. 299:1993;157-163.
6. Brautigam C.A., Steitz T.A. Structural and functional insights provided by crystal structures of DNA polymerases and their substrate complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8:1998;54-63.
7. Lindsley J.E., Fuchs R.P.P. Use of a single-turnover kinetics to study bulky adduct bypass by T7 DNA polymerase. Biochemistry. 33:1994;765-772.
8. Eckert K.A., Opresko P.L. DNA polymerase mutagenic bypass and proofreading of endogenous DNA lesions. Mutat. Res. 424:1999;221-236.
9. Goodman M.F. Hydrogen bonding revisited: geometric selection as a principal determinant of DNA replication fidelity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:1997;10493-10495.
10. Fuchs R.P.P., Napolitano R.L. Inactivation of DNA proofreading obviates the need for SOS induction in frameshift mutagenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:1998;13114-13119.
11. Vandewiele D.et al. Efficient translesion replication in the absence of Escherichia coli Umu proteins and 3′→5′ exonuclease proofreading function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:1998;15519-15524.
12. Gibbs P.E.M.et al. The T-T pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone uv photoproduct is much less mutagenic in yeast than in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:1995;1919-1922.
13. Hoffman G., Fuchs R.P.P. Mechanisms of frameshift mutations: insight from aromatic amines. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 10:1997;347-359.
14. Tang M.et al. UmuD′2C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, E. coli pol V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;8919-8924.
15. Reuven N.B.et al. The mutagenesis protein UmuD' and UmuC prevent lethal frameshifts while increasing base substitutions mutations. Mol. Cell. 2:1999;191-199.
16. Bailone A.et al. A RecA protein mutant deficient in its interaction with the UmuDC complex. Biochimie. 73:1991;479-484.
17. Kulaeva O.I.et al. Identification of a DinB/UmuC homolog in the archeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Mutat. Res. 357:1996;245-253.
18. Wagner J.et al. The dinB gene encodes a novel Escherichia coli DNA polymerase (DNA pol IV) involved in mutagenesis. Mol. Cell. 4:1999;281-287.
19. Bonner C.A.et al. Purification and characterization of an inducible Escherichia coli DNA polymerase capable of insertion and bypass at abasic lesions in DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 263:1988;18946-18952.
20. Nelson J.R.et al. Thymine-thymine dimer bypass by yeast DNA polymerase ζ Science. 272:1996;1646-1649.
21. Lawrence C.W., Hinkle D.C. DNA polymerase ζ and the control of DNA damage induced mutagenesis in eukaryotes. Cancer Surv. 28:1996;21-31.
22. Johnson J.E.et al. Efficient bypass of a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase, Polη Science. 283:1999;1001-1004.
23. Nelson J.R.et al. Deoxycytidyl transferase activity of yeast REV1 protein. Nature. 382:1996;729-731.
24. Gibbs P.E., Lawrence C.W. Novel mutagenic properties of abasic sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Mol. Biol. 251:1995;229-236.
25. Bork P.et al. A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins. FASEB J. 11:1997;68-76.
26. Opperman T.et al. A model for a umuDC-dependent prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;9218-9223.
27. Bridges B.A. DNA repair: getting past a lesion - at a cost. Curr. Biol. 8:1998;R886-R888.
28. Maenhaut-Michel G.et al. A umuDC-independent SOS pathway for frameshift mutagenesis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 373:1992;373-380.
29. Gibbs P.E.M.et al. A human homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae REV3 gene, which encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase ζ Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:1998;6876-6880.
30. Cordonnier A.M.et al. Impaired translesion synthesis in xeroderma pigmentosum variant extracts. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1999;2206-2211.
31. Masutani C.et al. The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase η Nature. 399:1999;700-704.
32. Johnson R.E.et al. hRAD30 mutations in the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum. Science. 285:1999;263-265.