Susceptibility to photoinhibition of three deciduous broadleaf tree species with different successional traits raised under various light regimes

Plant, Cell and Environment

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 81-89

  Kitao, Mitsutoshi ^a   Lei, T T ^a,b   Koike, T ^a,c   Tobita, H ^a   Maruyama, Y ^a  

^a FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Chlorophyll fluorescence; Photodamage; Photoprotection; Photosynthesis; Successional types

Indexed keywords

DECIDUOUS TREE; PHOTOINHIBITION; SHADE TOLERANCE; SUCCESSION;

ACER MONO; BETULA PLATYPHYLLA; QUERCUS MONGOLICA;

EID: 0033951321     PISSN: 01407791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00528.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anderson J.M. & Osmond C.B. (1987) Shade-sun responses: compromises between acclimation and photoinhibition. In Photoinhibition (eds D.J. Kyle, C.B. Osmond & C.J. Arntzen), pp. 1-38. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
2. Baker N.R. (1993) Light-use efficiency and photoinhibition of photosynthesis in plants under environmental stress. In Water Deficits: Plant Responses from Cell to Community (eds J.A.C. Smith & H. Griffiths), pp. 221-235. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford.
3. Baroli I. & Melis A. (1998) Photoinhibitory damage is modulated by the rate of photosynthesis and by the photosystem II light-harvesting chlorophyll antenna size. Planta 205, 288-296.
4. Bazzaz F.A. (1996) From fields to forests: Forest dynamics and regeneration in a changing environment. In Plants in Changing Environments: Linking Physiological, Population, and Community Ecology, pp. 239-263. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Björkman O. (1981) Responses to different quantum flux densities. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. New Series, Vol. 12A, Physiological Plant Ecology I: Responses to the Physical Environment (eds O.L. Lange, P.S. Nobel, C.B. Osmond & H. Ziegler), pp. 57-107. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
6. Canham C.D. (1989) Different responses to gap among shade-tolerant tree species. Ecology 70, 548-550.
7. Canham C.D. & Marks P.L. (1985) The response of woody plants to disturbance: patterns of establishment and growth. In The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Plant Dynamics (eds S.T.A. Pickett & P.S. White), pp. 197-216. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
8. Collins B.S., Dunne K.P. & Pickett S.T.A. (1985) Responses of forest herbs to canopy gaps. In The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Plant Dynamics (eds S.T.A. Pickett & P.S. White), pp. 217-234. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
9. Cornic G. (1994) Drought stress and high light effects on leaf photosynthesis. In Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis: From Molecular Mechanisms to the Field (eds N.R. Baker & J.R. Bowyer), pp. 297-313. Elsevier Science Publishers, New York.
10. 2 concentrations and during drought stress. Planta 183, 178-184.
11. Demmig-Adams B.& Adams W.W., III (1992) Photoprotection and other responses of plants to high light stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 43, 599-626.
12. Demmig-Adams B., Adams W.W., III, Logan B.A. & Verhoeven A.S. (1995) Xanthophyll cycle-dependent energy dissipation and flexible photosystem II efficiency in plants acclimated to light stress. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22, 249-260.
13. Genty B., Briantais J.-M. & Baker N.R. (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 990, 87-92.
14. Gray G.R., Savitch L.V., Ivanov A.G. & Huner N.P.A. (1996) Photosystem II excitation pressure and development of resistance to photoinhibition. II. Adjustment of photosynthetic capacity in winter wheat and winter rye. Plant Physiology 110, 61-71.
15. Harada Y. (1954) Forests and Environments. Hokkaido Silviculture Promotion Society (Zorinshinkoh Kyokai), Sapporo, Japan.
16. Hayashi K. (1985) Growth characteristics and silviculture in Quercus mongolica var. crispula Blume. In Handbook for Hardwood (ed. K. Sakaguchi), pp. 122-128. Association for Promotion of Forest Science,Tokyo, Japan.
17. Higo M. (1987) Growth characteristics of Quercus mongolica var. grosseserrata, Tilia japonica and Acer mono seedlings. Research Bulletins of the College Experiment Forests Hokkaido University 44, 139-152.
18. Higo M. (1994) Regeneration behaviors of tree species of secondary stands regenerated on sites disturbed by Typhoon 15: based on the proportion of advanced regeneration, growth rate, and seedling density in closed mature stands. Journal of Japanese Forestry Society 76, 531-539.
19. Ishizuka M., Sugawara S. & Kanazawa Y. (1988) The relationship between diffused light intensity under canopy and leader growth of some hardwoods saplings. Transactions of the Meeting of Hokkaido Branch of the Japanese Forestry Society 36, 48-50.
20. Kikuzawa K. (1983) Leaf survival of woody plants in deciduous broad-leaved forests. 1. Tall trees. Canadian Journal of Botany 61, 2133-2139.
21. Kitao M., Lei T.T., Koike T., Mori S. & Maruyama Y. (1997) Increased susceptibility to photoinhibition in leaves of Japanese elm (Ulmus davidiana var. japonica) with high manganese concentrations. In Plant Nutrition: For Sustainable Food Production and Environment (eds T. Ando, K. Fujita,T. Mae, H. Matsumoto, S. Mori & J. Sekiya), pp. 409-410. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
22. Koike T. (1986) Photosynthetic responses to light intensity of deciduous broad-leaved tree seedlings raised under various artificial shade. Environment Control in Biology 24, 51-58.
23. Koike T. (1988) Leaf structure and photosynthetic performance as related to the forest succession of deciduous broad-leaved trees. Plant Species Biology 3, 77-87.
24. Koike T. & Sakagami Y. (1985) Comparison of the photosynthetic responses to temperature and light of Betula maximowicziana and Betula platyphylla var. japonica. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 15, 631-635.
25. Koike T., Tabuchi R., Takahashi K., Mori S. & Lei T.T. (1998) Characteristics of the light response in seedlings and saplings of two mid-successional species, Ash and Kalopanax, during the early stage of regeneration in a mature forest. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 6, 73-84.
26. Königer M., Harris G.C. & Pearcy R.W.(1998) Interaction between photon flux density and elevated temperatures on photoinhibition in Alocasia macrorrhiza. Planta 205, 214-222.
27. Krause G.H. (1994) Photoinhibition induced by low temperatures. In Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis: From Molecular Mechanisms to the Field (eds N.R. Baker & J.R. Bowyer), pp. 331-348. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford.
28. Krause G.H. & Weis E. (1991) Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42, 313-349.
29. Krause G.H., Virgo A. & Winter K. (1995) High susceptibility to photoinhibition of young leaves of tropical forest trees. Planta 197, 583-591.
30. Květ J., Ondok J.P., Nečas J. & Jarvis P.G. (1971) Methods of growth analysis. In: Plant Photosynthetic Production (eds Z. Šesták J. Catsky & P.G. Jarvis), pp. 343-349. Dr W Junk, The Hague, Netherlands.
31. Lambers H. & Poorter H. (1992) Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. In Advances in Ecological Research (eds M. Begon & A.H. Fitter), pp. 187-261. Academic Press, London.
32. Leitsch J., Schnettger B., Critchley C. & Krause G.H. (1994) Two mechanisms of recovery from photoinhibition in vivo: reactivation of photosystem II related and unrelated to D1-protein turnover. Planta 194, 15-21.
33. Long S.P., Humphries S. & Falkowski P.G. (1994) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 45, 633-662.
34. Lovelock C.E., Kursar T.A., Skillman J.B. & Winter K. (1998) Photoinhibition in tropical forest understorey species with short- and long-lived leaves. Functional Ecology 12, 553-560.
35. Markwell J., Osterman J.C. & Mitchell J.L. (1995) Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Photosynthesis Research 46, 467-472.
36. Maruyama Y., Kitao M. & Mori S. (1997) Leaf tissue water relations of several broad-leaved tree species grown under different light conditions. Transactions of the Meeting in Hokkaido Branch of the Japanese Forestry Society 45, 35-37.
37. Mulkey S.S. & Pearcy R.W. (1992) Interactions between acclimation and photoinhibition of photosynthesis of a tropical forest understory herb, Alocasia macrorrhiza, during simulated canopy gap formation. Functional Ecology 6, 719-729.
38. Naidu S.L. & DeLucia E.H. (1997) Acclimation of shade-developed leaves on saplings exposed to late-season canopy gaps. Tree Physiology 17, 367-376.
39. Ögren E. & Rosenqvist E. (1992) On the significance of photoinhibition of photosynthesis in the field and its generality among species. Photosynthesis Research 33, 63-71.
40. Osmond C.B. (1994) What is photoinhibition? Some insights from comparisons of sun and shade plants. In Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis: From Molecular Mechanisms to the Field (eds N.R .Baker & J.R. Bowyer), pp. 1-24. Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford.
41. Park Y.-H., Chow W.S., Anderson J.M. & Hurry V.M. (1996) Differential susceptibility of photosystem II to light stress in light-acclimated pea leaves depends on the capacity for photochemical and non-radiative dissipation of light. Plant Science 115, 137-149.
42. Pearcy R.W. (1994) Photosynthetic response to sunflecks and light gaps: mechanisms and constraints. In Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis: From Molecular Mechanisms to the Field (eds N.R. Baker & J.R. Bowyer), pp. 255-271. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford.
43. Pearcy R.W. & Sims D.A. (1994) Photosynthetic acclimation to changing light environments: scaling from the leaf to the whole plant. In Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants: Ecophysiological Processes Above- and Belowground (eds M.M. Caldwell & R.W. Pearcy), pp. 145-174. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
44. Poorter H. (1989) Interspecific variation in relative growth rate: on ecological causes and physiological consequences. In Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity of Higher Plants (eds H. Lambers, M.L. Cambridge, H. Konings & T.L. Pons), pp. 45-68. SPB Academic Publishing by,The Hague, The Netherlands.
45. Powles S.B. (1984) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 35, 15-44.
46. Schreiber U., Bilger W. & Neubauer C. (1994) Chlorophyll fluorescence as a nonintrusive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo photosynthesis. In Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis (eds E.-D. Schulze & M.M. Caldwell), pp. 49-70. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
47. Thayer S.S. & Björkman O. (1990) Leaf xanthophyll content and composition in sun and shade determined by HPLC. Photosynthesis Research 23, 331-343.
48. Thiele A., Schirwitz K., Winter K. & Krause G.H. (1996) Increased xanthophyll cycle activity and reduced D1 protein inactivation related to photoinhibition in two plant systems acclimated to excess light. Plant Science 115, 237-250.