Effects of postdialysis urea rebound on the quantification of pediatric hemodialysis

Nephron

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 124-129

  Marsenić, Olivera ^a,b   Pavličić, Dubravka ^b   Bigović, Gordana ^a   Peco Antić, Amira ^a   Jovanović, Olga ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Serbia)

^b ul Bore Kostića 47 ^*

Author keywords

Double pool urea kinetic modeling; Pediatric hemodialysis; Urea rebound

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; UREA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; KINETICS; MALE; PEDIATRICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; SCHOOL CHILD; UREA BLOOD LEVEL; UREA CYCLE;

EID: 0033951118     PISSN: 00282766     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000045559     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Depner TA: Approach to hemodialysis urea modeling; in Henrich WL (ed): Principles and Practice of Dialysis. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1994, pp 47-62.
2. Pedrini LA, Zereik S, Rasmy S: Causes, kinetics and clinical implications of post-hemodialysis urea rebound. Kidney Int 1988;34:817-824.
3. Kaufman AM, Schneditz D, Smye S, Polaschegg HD, Levin NW: Solute disequilibrium and multicompartmental modeling. Adv Ren Replace Ther 1995;2:319-329.
4. Harmon WE: Kinetic modeling of hemodialysis in children. Semin Dial 1994;7:392-397.
5. Evans JHC, Smyc SW, Brocklebank JT: Mathematical modelling of haemodialysis in children. Pediatr Nephrol 1992;6:349-353.
6. Alloatti S, Molino A, Manes M, Bosticardo GM: Urea rebound and effectively delivered dialysis dose. Ncphrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13(suppl 6):25-30.
7. Fischbach M, Boudailliez B, Foulard M: Phosphate end dialysis value: A misleading parameter of hemodialysis efficiency. Pediatr Nephrol 1997;11:193-195.
8. Leblane M, Charbonneau R, Lalumière G, Cartier P, Deziel C: Postdialysis urea rebound: Determinants and influence on dialysis delivery in chronic hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1996;27:253-261.
9. Spiegel DM, Baker PL, Babcock S, Contiguglia R, Klein M: Hemodialysis urea rebound: The effect of increasing dialysis efficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 1995;25:26-29.
10. Tattersall JE, De Takats D, Chamney P, Greenwood RN, Farrington K: The post-hemodialysis rebound: Predicting and quantifying its effect on Kt/V. Kidney Int 1996;50:2094-2102.
11. Albouze G, Yanai M, Calamai M, Testou D, Jungers P, Man NK: Urea rebound and residual renal function in the calculation of Kt/V and protein catabolic rate. Kidney Int 1993;43: 278-281.
12. Smye SW, Dunderdale E, Brownridge G, Will E: Estimation of treatment dose in high-efficiency haemodialysis. Nephron 1994;67:24-29.
13. Depner TA: Assessing adequacy of hemodialysis: Urea modeling. Kidney Int 1994;45:1522-1535.
14. Cappello A, Grandi F, Lamberti C, Santoro A: Comparative evaluation of different methods to estimate urea distribution volume and generation rate. Int J Artif Organs 1994;17:322-330.
15. Jean G, Chazot C, Charra B, Terrat JC, Vanel T, Calemard E, Laurent G: Is post-dialysis urea rebound significant with long slow hemodialysis? Blood Purif 1998;16:187-196.
16. Smye SW, Evans JHC, Will E, Brocklebank JT: Paediatric haemodialysis: Estimation of treatment efficiency in the presence of urea rebound. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1992;13:51-62.
17. Hemodialysis Adequacy Work Group of the National Kidney Foundation: Guideline 2: Method of Measurement of Delivered Dose of Hemodialysis. Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (DOQI): Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Adequacy - The National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 30(suppl):22-31.
18. Hemodialysis Adequacy Work Group of the National Kidney Foundation: Guideline 8: Acceptable Methods for BUN Sampling. Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (DOQI): Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Adequacy - The National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;30(suppl):38-42.
19. Sargent JA, Gotch FA: Principles and biophysics of dialysis; in Maher JF (ed): Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis. ed 3. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1989, pp 87-143.
20. LeFebvre JMJ, Spanner E, Heidenheim P, Lindsey RM: Kt/V: Patients do not get what the physician prescribes. ASAIO Trans 1991; 37:M132-M133.
21. Marsenic O, Peco-Antic A, Jovanovic O: Comparison of two methods to predict equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V) using true eKt/V value. Pediatr Nephrol 1999;13:418-422.
22. Flanigan MJ, Lim VS, Redlin J: The significance of protein intake and catabolism. Adv Ren Replace Ther 1995;2:330-340.
23. Cheek DB, Mellits D, Elliot D: Body water, height, and weight during growth in normal children. Am J Dis Child 1966:112:312-317.
24. Bland MJ, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307-310.
25. Daugirdas JT: Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: Analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993;4: 1205-1213.
26. Maasrani M, Jaffrin MY, Fischbach M, Boudailliez B: Urea, creatinine and phosphate kinetic modeling during dialysis: Application to pediatric hemodialysis. Int J Artif Organs 1995;18:122-129.
27. Held PJ, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Stannard DC, Carrol CE, Daugirdas JT, Bloembergen WE, Greer JW, Hakim RM: The dose of hemodialysis and patient mortality. Kidney Int 1996;50: 550-556.
28. Daugirdas JT, Schneditz D: Overestimation of hemodialysis dose depends on dialysis efficiency by regional blood flow but not by conventional two pool urea kinetic analysis. ASAIO J 1995;41:M719-M724.
29. Wuhl E, Fusch C, Schärer K, Mehls O, Schaefer F: Assessment of total body water in pediatric patients on dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996;11:75-80.