Random pulse input versus continuous current plus white noise: Are they equivalent?

Neurocomputing

Volumn 32-33, Issue , 2000, Pages 127-132

  Feerick, Stuart ^a   Feng, Jianfeng ^a   Brown, David ^a  

^a BABRAHAM INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Hodgkin Huxley model; Stochastic synaptic input; The usual approximation

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POISSON DISTRIBUTION;

HODGKIN-HUXLEY MODEL; STOCHASTIC SYNAPTIC INPUT;

NEUROPHYSIOLOGY;

ARTICLE; DIFFUSION; HODGKIN HUXLEY EQUATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NEUROSCIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPIKE; STATISTICS; SYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; WHITE NOISE;

EID: 0033941762     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-2312(00)00153-3     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. D. Brown, J. Feng, Is there a problem matching real and model CV(ISI)? Neurocomputing 26 (7) (1999) 87-91.
2. J. Feng, D. Brown, Coefficient of variation of interspike intervals greater than 0.5. How and when? Biol. Cybernet. 80 (1999) 291-297.
3. F.B. Hanson, H.C. Tuckwell, Diffusion approximation for neuronal activity including synaptic reversal potentials. J. Theoret. Neurobiol. 2 (1983) 127-153.
4. A.L. Hodgkin, A.F. Huxley, A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. 117 (1952) 500-544.
5. P. Lánsky, M. Musila, Variable initial depolarisation in Stein's neuronal model with synaptic reversal potentials. Biol. Cybernet. 94 (1991) 285-291.
6. M. Musila, P. Lánsky, On the interspike intervals calculated from diffusion approximations of Stein's neuronal model with reversal potentials. J. Theoret. Biol. 171 (1994) 225-232.