Von Langenbeck or Wardill procedures for primary palatal repair in patients with isolated cleft palate - Speech results

Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 27-32

  Becker, Magnus ^a   Svensson, Henry ^a   Sarnäs, Karl Victor ^a   Jacobsson, Sten ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Isolated cleft palate; Long term results; Speech; Von Langenbeck; Wardill

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLEFT PALATE; FEMALE; FISTULA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PALATOPLASTY; PHARYNX RECONSTRUCTION; SCAR; SPEECH DISORDER; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0033941045     PISSN: 02844311     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02844310050160141     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. 1. Cohen SR, Kalinowski J, LaRossa D, Randall P. Cleft palate fistulas: a multivariate statistical analysis of prevalence, etiology, and surgical management [see comments]. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87: 1041-1047.
2. 2. Haapanen ML, Rantala SL. Correlation between the age at repair and speech outcome in patients with isolated cleft palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1992; 26: 71-78.
3. 3. Haapanen ML. Effect of method of cleft palate repair on the quality of speech at the age of 6 years. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1995; 29: 245-250.
4. 4. Henningsson G, Isberg A. Influence of palatal fistulae on speech and resonance. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 1987; 39: 183-191.
5. 5. Jakobsson OP, Svanholm H, Bergström R. Closure of the cleft palate in one or two stages: speech results after repair of isolated cleft palate. Repair of isolated cleft palate. A comparison of one-and two-stage surgery by dental arch measurements. Cephalometry, and speech analysis. Thesis, Uppsala: University of Uppsala, 1990.
6. 6. Karling J, Larson O, Henningsson G. Oronasal fistulas in cleft palate patients and their influence on speech. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1993; 27: 193-201.
7. 7. Kent R. Psychobiology of speech development: coemergence of language and a movement system. Am J Physiol 1984; 246: R888-R894.
8. 8. Lohmander-Agerskov A, Havstam C, Söderpalm E et al. Assessment of speech in children after repair of isolated cleft palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1993; 27: 307-310.
9. 9. Lohmander-Agerskov A, Friede H, Söderpalm E, Lilja J. Residual clefts in the hard palate: correlation between cleft size and speech. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997; 34: 122-128.
10. 10. McWilliams BJ, Randall P, LaRossa D et al. Speech characteristics associated with the Furlow palatoplasty as compared with other surgical techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98: 610-619.
11. 11.Myklebust O, Åbyholm FK. Speech results in CLP patients operated on with a von Langenbeck palatal closure. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1989; 23: 71-74.
12. 12. Randall P, LaRossa DD, Fakhraee SM, Cohen MA. Cleft palate closure at 3 to 7 months of age: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 71: 624-628.
13. 13. Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1987; 24: 5-77.
14. 14. Van Demark D, Bzoch K, Daly D et al. Methods of assessing speech in relation to velopharyngeal function. Cleft Palate J 1985; 22: 281-285.
15. 15. von Langenbeck B. Beitraege zur Osteoplastic. Deutsch Klin 1859; 2: 471.
16. 16. Wardill W. Technique of operation for cleft palate. Br J Surg 1937; 25: 117.
17. 17. Witzel MA, Clarke JA, Lindsay WK, Thomson HG. Comparison of results of pushback or von Langenbeck repair of isolated cleft of the hard and soft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 64: 347-352.