Relevance of structuralist and dependency theories in the neoliberal period: A Latin American perspective

Journal of Developing Societies

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 49-69

  Kay, Cristóbal ^a   Gwynne, Robert N ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; ECONOMIC PLANNING; NEOLIBERALISM; POLITICAL ECONOMY;

CARIBBEAN ISLANDS; CENTRAL AMERICA; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 0033940286     PISSN: 0169796X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156852200511987     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. ARNDT, H.W. 1987 Economic Development: The History of an Idea. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. BITAR, S. 1988 "Neo-liberalism Versus Neo-Structuralism in Latin America." Cepal Review 34:45-62.
3. BLOMSTRÖM, M. and B. HETTNE 1984 Development Theory in Transition. The Dependency Debate and Beyond: Third World Responses. London: Zed Books.
4. +, C. van der 1995 "A Comparison of Four Development Models in Latin America." The European Journal of Development Research, 7(2):276-296.
5. BRESSER PEREIRA, L.C. 1996 Economic Crisis and State Reform in Brazil: Toward a New Interpretation of Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
6. CARDOSO, F.H. and E. FALETTO 1979 Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. CASTELLS, M. and R. LASERNA 1994 "The New Dependency: Technological Change and Socioeconomic Restructuring in Latin America." Pp. 57-83 in Comparative National Development: Society and Economy in the New Global Order, edited by A.D. Kincaid and A. Portes. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
8. CUDDINGTON, J.T. 1992 "Long-Run Trends in 26 Primary Commodity Prices: A Disaggregated Look at the Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis." Journal of Development Economics 39(2):207-227.
9. DIAKOSAVVAS, D. and P.L. SCANDIZZO 1991 "Trends in the Terms of Trade of Primary Commodities, 1900-1982: The Controversy and its Origins." Economic Development and Cultural Change 39(2):231-264.
10. ECLAC (ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN) 1990 Changing Production Patterns with Social Equity. Santiago: ECLAC. 1992 Social Equity and Changing Production Patterns: An Integrated Approach. Santiago: ECLAC. 1994 El Regionalismo Abierto en América Latina y el Caribe: La Integración al Servicio de la Transformación Productiva con Equidad. Santiago: CEPAL. 1995 Latin America and the Caribbean: Policies to Improve Linkages with the Global Economy. Santiago: ECLAC.
11. ECLAC (ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN) 1990 Changing Production Patterns with Social Equity. Santiago: ECLAC. 1992 Social Equity and Changing Production Patterns: An Integrated Approach. Santiago: ECLAC. 1994 El Regionalismo Abierto en América Latina y el Caribe: La Integración al Servicio de la Transformación Productiva con Equidad. Santiago: CEPAL. 1995 Latin America and the Caribbean: Policies to Improve Linkages with the Global Economy. Santiago: ECLAC.
12. ECLAC (ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN) 1990 Changing Production Patterns with Social Equity. Santiago: ECLAC. 1992 Social Equity and Changing Production Patterns: An Integrated Approach. Santiago: ECLAC. 1994 El Regionalismo Abierto en América Latina y el Caribe: La Integración al Servicio de la Transformación Productiva con Equidad. Santiago: CEPAL. 1995 Latin America and the Caribbean: Policies to Improve Linkages with the Global Economy. Santiago: ECLAC.
13. ECLAC (ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN) 1990 Changing Production Patterns with Social Equity. Santiago: ECLAC. 1992 Social Equity and Changing Production Patterns: An Integrated Approach. Santiago: ECLAC. 1994 El Regionalismo Abierto en América Latina y el Caribe: La Integración al Servicio de la Transformación Productiva con Equidad. Santiago: CEPAL. 1995 Latin America and the Caribbean: Policies to Improve Linkages with the Global Economy. Santiago: ECLAC.
14. FAJNZYLBER, F. 1990 "Sobre la impostergable transformación productiva de América Latina." Pensamiento Iberoamericano 16:85-129.
15. FFRENCH-DAVIS, R. 1988 "An Outline of a Neo-Structuralist Approach." Cepal Review 34:37-44.
16. FRANK, A.G. 1967 Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press. 1991 "Latin American Development Theories Revisited: A Participant Review Essay." European Journal of Development Research 3(2): 146-159. Also published in Latin American Perspectives, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1992, pp. 125-139. A longer version was published in The Scandinavian Journal of Development Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1991, pp. 133-150.
17. FRANK, A.G. 1967 Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press. 1991 "Latin American Development Theories Revisited: A Participant Review Essay." European Journal of Development Research 3(2): 146-159. Also published in Latin American Perspectives, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1992, pp. 125-139. A longer version was published in The Scandinavian Journal of Development Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1991, pp. 133-150.
18. FRANK, A.G. 1967 Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press. 1991 "Latin American Development Theories Revisited: A Participant Review Essay." European Journal of Development Research 3(2): 146-159. Also published in Latin American Perspectives, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1992, pp. 125-139. A longer version was published in The Scandinavian Journal of Development Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1991, pp. 133-150.
19. FRANK, A.G. 1967 Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press. 1991 "Latin American Development Theories Revisited: A Participant Review Essay." European Journal of Development Research 3(2): 146-159. Also published in Latin American Perspectives, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1992, pp. 125-139. A longer version was published in The Scandinavian Journal of Development Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1991, pp. 133-150.
20. GEREFFI, G. 1994 "Rethinking Development Theory: Insights from East Asia and Latin America." Pp. 26-56 in Comparative National Development: Society and Economy in the New Global Order, edited by A.D. Kincaid and A. Portes. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
21. GEREFFI, G. and M. KORZENIEWICZ 1994 Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport: Praeger.
22. GEREFFI, G. and D.L. WYMAN (Eds) 1990 Manufacturing Miracles: Paths of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23. GORE, C. 1996 "Methodological Nationalism and the Misunderstanding of East Asian Industrialization." The European Journal of Development Research 8(1):77-122.
24. GREEN, D. 1995 Silent Revolution: The Rise of Market Economics in Latin America. London: Cassell.
25. GWYNNE, R.N. 1990 New Horizons? Third World Industrialization in an International Framework. Harlow: Longman.
26. HAGGART, S. and R.R. KAUFMAN (Eds) 1995 The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27. HARRIS, R.L. 1995 "The Global Context of Contemporary Latin American Affairs." Pp. 279-304 in Cap̊ital, Power, and Inequality in Latin America, edited by S. Halebsky and R.L. Harris. Boúlder: Westview Press.
28. HARRISON, D. 1988 The Sociology of Modernization and Development. London: Unwin Hyman.
29. HOUT, W. 1993 Capitalism and the Third World: Development, Dependency and the World System. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
30. KAHLER, M. 1990 "Orthodoxy and its Alternatives: Explaining Approaches to Stabilization and Adjustment." Pp. - in Economic Crisis and Policy Choice: The Politics of Adjustment in the Third World, edited by J.M. Nelson. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
31. KAY, C. 1989 Latin American Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. London: Routledge. 1991 "Reflections on the Latin American Contribution to Development Theory." Development and Change 22(1):31-68. "Back to the Future: The Latin American Development School and Neoliberalism." Pp. 9-23 in People in Politics: Debating Democracy in Latin America, edited by F. Wilson and F. Stepputat. Copenhagen: Centre for Development Research.
32. KAY, C. 1989 Latin American Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. London: Routledge. 1991 "Reflections on the Latin American Contribution to Development Theory." Development and Change 22(1):31-68. "Back to the Future: The Latin American Development School and Neoliberalism." Pp. 9-23 in People in Politics: Debating Democracy in Latin America, edited by F. Wilson and F. Stepputat. Copenhagen: Centre for Development Research.
33. KAY, C. 1989 Latin American Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. London: Routledge. 1991 "Reflections on the Latin American Contribution to Development Theory." Development and Change 22(1):31-68. "Back to the Future: The Latin American Development School and Neoliberalism." Pp. 9-23 in People in Politics: Debating Democracy in Latin America, edited by F. Wilson and F. Stepputat. Copenhagen: Centre for Development Research.
34. KEARNEY, M. 1995 "The Local and the Global: The Anthropology of Globalization and Transnationalism." Annual Review of Anthropology 24:547-565.
35. KIELY, R. 1995 Sociology & Development: The Impasse and Beyond. London: University College London Press.
36. KLAK, T. (Ed.) 1998 Globalization and Liberalism: The Caribbean Context. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
37. KRUGMAN, P. 1994 "Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession." Foreign Affairs 73(2):28-44.
38. LARRAÍN, J. 1989 Theories of Development: Capitalism, Colonialism and Dependency. Cambridge: Polity Press.
39. LEHMANN, D. 1990 Democracy and Development in Latin America. Cambridge: Polity Press.
40. LEIVA, F.I. 1998 "Disciplining Workers in 'Post-Neoliberal' Chile: Neostructuralism, Labor Flexibility and Social Fragmentation in the 1990s." Paper presented at the inaugural conference of the Center for Latin American, November 20-21, Caribbean and Latino Studies, University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
41. LEYS, C. 1996 The Rise and Fall of Development Theory. London: James Curry.
42. LOVE, J.L. 1994 "Economic Ideas and Ideologies in Latin America Since 1930." Pp. 393-460 in Latin America Since 1930. Economy, Society and Politics, edited by L. Bethell. The Cambridge History of Latin America, Vol. VI, Part I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. LUSTIG, N. 1991 "From Structuralism to Neostructuralism: The Search for a Heterodox Paradigm." Pp. 27-42 in The Latin American Development Debate: Neostructuralism, Neomonetarism, and Adjustment Processes, edited by P. Meller. Boulder: Westview Press.
44. MARTÍNEZ, J. and A. DÍAZ 1996 Chile: The Great Transformation. Geneva: UNRISD.
45. OCAMPO, J.A. 1993 "Terms of Trade and Center-Periphery Relations." Pp. 333-357 in Development from Within: Toward a Neostructuralist Approach for Latin America, edited by O. Sunkel. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
46. PACKENHAM, R.A. 1992 The Dependency Movement: Scholarship and Politics in Development Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
47. PEET, R. 1991 Global Capitalism: Theories of Societal Development. London: Routledge.
48. PETRAS, J. and F.I. LEIVA 1994 Democracy and Poverty in Chile: The Limits of Electoral Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.
49. PETRAS, J. and M. MORLEY 1992 Latin America in the Time of Cholera: Electoral Politics, Market Economics, and Permanent Crisis. New York: Routledge.
50. PORTER, M. 1990 The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Basingstoke and London: Macmillan.
51. PREBISCH, R. 1962 "The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems." Economic Bulletin for Latin America 7(1):1-22.
52. PRESTON, P. W. 1996 Development Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
53. RAMOS, J. and O. SUNKEL 1993 "Toward a Neostructuralist Synthesis." Pp. 5-19 in Development from Within: Toward a Neostructuralist Approach for Latin America, edited by O. Sunkel. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
54. ROSALES, O. 1988 "An Assessment of the Structuralist Paradigm for Latin American Development and the Prospects for its Development." Cepal Review 34:19-36.
55. SINGER, H.W. 1991 "Terms of Trade: New Wine and New Bottles?" Development Policy Review 9(4):339-352.
56. SLATER, D. 1990 "Development Theory at the Crossroads." European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 48:116-126.
57. SO, A.Y. 1990 Social Change and Development: Modernization, Dependency, and World-System Theories. Newbury Park: Sage.
58. SPYBEY, T. 1992 Social Change, Development and Dependency: Modernity, Colonialism and the Development of the West. Cambridge: Polity Press.
59. SUNKEL, O. 1994 "Un enfoque neoestructuralista de la reforma económica, la crisis social y la viabilidad democrática en América Latina." Paper presented at the XVIII International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA), 10-12 March, Atlanta. 1993 "From Inward-Looking Development to Development from Within." Pp. 23-59 in Development from Within: Toward a Neostructuralist Approach for Latin America, edited by O. Sunkel. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
60. SUNKEL, O. 1994 "Un enfoque neoestructuralista de la reforma económica, la crisis social y la viabilidad democrática en América Latina." Paper presented at the XVIII International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA), 10-12 March, Atlanta. 1993 "From Inward-Looking Development to Development from Within." Pp. 23-59 in Development from Within: Toward a Neostructuralist Approach for Latin America, edited by O. Sunkel. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
61. SUNKEL, O. and G. ZULETA 1990 "Neo-Structuralism Versus Neo-Liberalism in the 1990s." Cepal Review 42:35-41.
62. VELTMEYER, H., J. PETRAS AND S. VIEUX 1997 Neoliberalism and Class Conflict in Latin America. London: Macmillan.
63. WADE, R. 1990 Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1996 "Japan, The World Bank and the Art of Paradigm Maintenance: The East Asian Miracle in Political Perspective." New Left Review 217:3-36.
64. WADE, R. 1990 Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1996 "Japan, The World Bank and the Art of Paradigm Maintenance: The East Asian Miracle in Political Perspective." New Left Review 217:3-36.
65. WADE, R. and F. VENEROSO 1998 "The Asian Crisis: The High Debt Model Versus the Wall Street-Treasury-IMF Complex." New Left Review 228:3-23.
66. WILLIAMSON, J. (Ed.) 1990 Latin American Adjustment: How Much has Happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
67. WORLD BANK 1993 The East Asian Miracle: Public Policy and Economic Growth. New York: Oxford University Press. 1997 World Development Report 1997. New York: Oxford University Press.
68. WORLD BANK 1993 The East Asian Miracle: Public Policy and Economic Growth. New York: Oxford University Press. 1997 World Development Report 1997. New York: Oxford University Press.