Identifying software productivity improvement approaches and risks: Construction industry case study

IEEE Software

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 48-56

  Hantos, Peter ^a   Gisbert, Mario ^b  

^a XEROX CORPORATION   (United States)

^b Lincoln Properties   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; PRODUCTIVITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0033939810     PISSN: 07407459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/52.819968     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. M.C. Paulk et al., Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1, Tech. Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., 1993.
2. G. Moore, Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling Technology Products to Mainstream Customers, Harper Business, New York, 1991.
3. G.V. Scott and J.M. Bieman, "Rapid Prototyping: Lessons Learned," IEEE Software, Vol. 12, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 1995, pp. 85-95.
4. S. McConnell, Rapid Development: Taming Wild Schedules, Microsoft Press, Redmond, Wash., 1996.
5. J.D. Blackburn, G.D. Scudder, and L.N. Van Wassenhove, "Improving Speed and Productivity of Software Development: A Global Survey of Software Developers," IEEE Trans. Software Eng., Vol. 22, No. 12, Dec. 1996, pp. 875-885.
6. P. Hantos and S. Joseph, "Object Technology Adoption: A Risk Management Perspective," Proc. Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conf., pp. 49-66; www.pnsqc.org.
7. B. Boehm, "Making RAD Work for Your Project," Computer, Vol. 32, No. 3, Mar. 1999, pp. 113-117.