The anatomy and relations of evidence-based medicine

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 385-392

  McDonald, I G ^a   Daly, J M ^b  

^a St Vincent's Hospital   (United States)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; REVIEW;

EID: 0033939041     PISSN: 00048291     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2000.tb00842.x     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. 1. Sackett D. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and isn't. BMJ 1996; 312: 711-2.
2. 2. Benech I, Wilson AE, Dowell AC. Evidence-based practice in primary care: past, present and future. J Eval Clin Prac 1996; 2: 249-63.
3. 3. Miles A, Bentley P, Polychronis A et al. Recent progress in health services research: on the need for the evidence-based debate. J Eval Clin Prac 1998; 4: 257-65.
4. 4. Tanenbaum S. What physicians know. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1268-71.
5. 5. Feinstein AR. Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 71-9.
6. 6. Bradley F, Field F. Letter to the editor. Lancet 1995; 346: 838-9.
7. 7. Polychronis A, Miles A, Bentley P. Evidence-based medicine: reference? dogma? neologism? new orthodoxy? J Eval Clin Prac 1996; 2: 1-3.
8. 8. Polychronis A, Miles A, Bentley P. The protagonists of 'evidence-based medicine': arrogant, seductive and controversial. J Eval Clin Prac 1996; 2: 9-12.
9. 9. Hunter DJ. Rationing and evidence-based medicine. J Eval Clin Prac 1996; 2: 5-8.
10. 10. McDonald IG. The last wave: medical practice must respond to cultural change. Arena Magazine 1998; 37: October-November, 45-8.
11. 11. European Commission Directorate XIII.C. 4th Research and Development Framework Programme. Telematics Applications Programme. Brussels: 1998.
12. 12. Rothwell PM. Can overall results of clinical trials be applied to all patients'? Lancet 1995; 345: 1616-9.
13. 13. National Health and Medical Research Council Quality of Care and Health Outcomes Committee. Guidelines for the development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council, 1995.
14. 14. Daly JM, McDonald IG. The social impact of echo-cardiography: opening Pandora's box. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service, 1993. (Health Care Technology Series, No 9.)
15. 15. The PACE (population-adjusted clinical epidemiology) strategy: a new approach to multicentred clinical research. Q J Med 1997; 90: 147-51.
16. 16. Cabot R, quoted in Harvey AM, Bordley J. Differential Diagnosis: the interpretation of clinical evidence. 1955; 3.
17. 17. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based Medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1997.
18. 18. Gray JAM. Evidence-based healthcare: how to make health policy and management decisions. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1997.
19. 19. Weed LL. New connections between medical knowledge and patient care. BMJ 1997; 315: 231-5.
20. 20. Hacking I. The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
21. 21. Porter TM. Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
22. 22. Louis PCM. Researches on the effects of bloodletting on some inflammatory diseases, and on the influence of tartarized antimony and vesication in pneumonitis. Trans. Putnam CG. Boston: Hilliard, Gray, 1836.
23. 23. Feinstein AR. Clinical judgment. Malabar: Kreiger, 1967.
24. 24. Matthews JR. Quantification and the quest for medical certainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
25. 25. Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1972.
26. 26. Codman EA. The product of a hospital. Surg Gynecol Obst 1914; 18: 491-6.
27. 27. Plsek PE. Resource B: a primer on quality improvement tools. In: Berwick DM, Godfrey AB, Roessner (Eds.).Curing health care: new strategies for quality improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990.
28. 28. Blumenthal D. Applying industrial quality management science to physicians' decisions. In: Blumenthal D, Scheck AC (Eds.). Improving clinical practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995.
29. 29. Agency for Health Policy and Research Workgroup. Using clinical practice guidelines to evaluate quality of care. Agency for Health Policy and Research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1995.
30. 30. Health Care Quality Commission. Consumer protection and quality in the health care industry. Quality first: better health care for all Americans. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.
31. 31. Quality Management Team, NHS Executive, Department of Health, 1999.
32. 32. Foote SB. Assessing medical technology assessment: past, present and future. Milbank Quarterly 1987; 65: 59-80.
33. 33. Banta HD, Luce BR. Health care technology and its assessment: an international perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
34. 34. IOM Core Committee. Promise and limitations of effectiveness and health outcomes research. In: Heithoff KA, Lohr KN (Eds.). Effectiveness and outcomes in health care. Washington: National Academy Press, 1990.
35. 35. Ellwood PM. Outcomes management: a technology of patient experience. N Engl J Med 1990 1988; 318: 1549-56.
36. 36. Capra F. The turning point: science, society, and the rising culture. London: Flamingo, 1982.
37. 37. Anon. Evidence-based medicine, in its place. Lancet 1995; 346: 785.