Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in nucleus-22 cochlear implant users

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 227-235

  Fu, Qian Jie ^a   Shannon, Robert V ^a  

^a HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONSONANT; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ERROR; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; MALE; PHONEME; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH REHABILITATION; VOWEL;

EID: 0033938240     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200006000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Boothroyd, A., Erickson, F. N., & Medwetsky, L. (1994). The hearing aid input: A phonemic approach to assessing the spectral distribution of speech. Ear and Hearing, 15, 432-442.
2. Dorman, M. F., Smith, L., & Parkin, J. (1993). Loudness balance between acoustic and electric stimulation by a patient with a multichannel cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 14, 290-292.
3. Drullman, R. (1995). Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 585-592.
4. Eddington, D., Dobelle, W., Brackmann, D., Mladejovsky, M., & Parkin, J. (1978). Auditory prosthesis research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology. Supplement, 87, 1-39.
5. Fu, Q.-J., & Shannon, R. V. (1998). Effects of amplitude nonlinearity on speech recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 2571-2577.
6. Fu, Q.-J., & Shannon, R. V. (1999). Effects of acoustic dynamic range on phoneme recognition in quiet and noise by cochlear implant listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, L65-L70.
7. Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L., Clark, M., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099-3111.
8. Jesteadt, W. (1980). An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 85-88.
9. Licklider, J. C. R., & Pollack, I. (1948). Effects of differentiation, integration, and infinite peak clipping on the intelligibility of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20, 42-51.
10. MeDermott, H. J., McKay, C. M., & Vandali, A. E. (1992). A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/ Nucleus Limited Multichannel cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 3367-3371.
11. Miller, G., & Nicely, P. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338-352.
12. Nelson, D. A., Schmitz, J. L., Donaldson, G. S., Viemeister, N. F., & Javel, E. (1996). Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2393-2414.
13. Schroder, A. C., Viemeister, N. F., & Nelson, D. A. (1994). Intensity discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 2683-2693.
14. Seligman, P. M., & McDermott, H. J. (1995). Architecture of the Spectra-22 speech processor. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 104(Suppl.166), 139-141.
15. Shannon, R. V., Adams, D. D., Ferrel, R. L., Palumbo, R. L., & Grandgenett, M. (1990). A computer interface for psychophysical and speech research with the Nucleus cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 905-907.
16. Stevens, S. S. (1937). On hearing by electrical stimulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 8, 191-195.
17. Stevens, S. S. (1955). The measurement of loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 815-829.
18. Stevens, S. S. (1959). Cross-modality validation of subjective scales for loudness, vibration, and electric shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 201-209.
19. Zeng, F.-G., & Galvin, J. J. (1999). Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners. Ear and Hearing, 20, 60-74.
20. Zeng, F.-G., & Shannon, R. V. (1992). Loudness balance between electric and acoustic stimulation. Hearing Research, 60, 231-235.
21. Zeng, F.-G., Shannon, R. V., & Hellman, W. S. (1998). Physiological processes underlying psychophysical laws. In A. R. Palmer, A. Rees, A. Q. Summerfield, & R. Meddis (Eds.), Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing (pp. 473-481). London: Wurr Publishers Ltd.