Health risks of genetically modified foods: A literature review;Riesgos sobre la salud de los alimentos modificados geneticamente: Una revision bibliografica

Revista Espanola de Salud Publica

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 255-261

  Domingo Roig, José L ^a   Gómez Arnáiz, Mercedes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

Author keywords

Genetically modified (GMF) foods; Internet; Literature review; Medline; Toxicity; Toxline

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD PROCESSING; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; TOXICITY TESTING;

FOOD; FOOD TECHNOLOGY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GUIDELINES; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MEDLINE; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED;

EID: 0033937053     PISSN: 11355727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Gatehouse AMR, Down RE, Powell KS et al. Transgenic potato plants with enhanced resistance to the peach-potato aphid Myzus persicae. Ent Exp Appt 1996;79:295-307.
2. Feldbaum CB. Health risks of genetically modified foods. Lancet 1999;354:70.
3. Lachmann P. Health risks of genetically modified foods. Lancet 1999;354:69.
4. Malcom ADB. Health risks of genetically modified foods. Lancet 1999;354:70.
5. Schellekens H. Health risks of genetically modified foods. Lancet 1999;354:71.
6. Hammond BG, Vicini JL, Hartnell GF et al. The feeding value of soybeans fed to rats, chickens, catfish and dairy cattle is not altered by genetic incorporation of glyphosate tolerance. J Nutr 1996;126:717-27.
7. Harrison LA, Bailey MR, Naylor MW et al. The expressed protein in glyphosate-tolerant soybeans, 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase from Agrobacterium sp. strain CP4, is rapidly digested in vitro and is not toxic to acutely gavaged mice. J Nutr 1996; 126:728-40.
8. Fares NH, El-Sayed AK. Fine structural changes in the ileum of mice fed on delta-endotoxin-treated potatoes and transgenic potatoes. Nat Toxins 1998;6:219-33.
9. Brake J, Vlachos D. Evaluation of transgenic Event 176 «Bt» corn in broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 1998;77:648-53.
10. Onischenko GG, Tutel'ian VA, Petukhov AI et al. Current approaches to the evaluation of genetically modified food products. Vopr Pitan 1999;68:3-8.
11. Tutel'ian VA, Kravchenko LV, Lashneva NV et al. Medical and biological evaluation of safety of protein concentrate from genetically-modified soybeans. Biochemical studies. Vopr Pitan 1999;68:9-12.
12. Ewen SWB, Pusztai A. Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine. Lancet 1999;354:1353-4.
13. Fenton B, Stanley K, Fenton S, Bolton-Smith C. Differential binding of the insecticidal lectin GNA to human blood cells Lancet 1999;354:1354-5.
14. Horton R. Genetically modified foods: «absurd» concern or welcome dialogue? Lancet 1999;354:1314-5.
15. Kuiper HA, Noteborn HPJM, Peijnenburg AACM. Adequacy of methods for testing the safety of genetically modified foods. Lancet 1999;354:1315-6.
16. Mowat A. GM food debate. Lancet 1999; 354:1725.
17. Fitzgerald AJ, Goodlad RA, Wright NA. GM food debate. Lancet 1999;354:1725-6.
18. Lachmann P. GM food debate. Lancet 1999; 354:1726.
19. Ewen SWB, Pusztai A. Health risks of genetically modified foods. Lancet 1999;354:684.
20. Schubbert R, Renz D, Schmitz B, Doerfler W. Foreign (M13) DNA ingested by mice reaches peripheral leukocytes, spleen, and liver via the intestinal wall mucosa and can be covalently linked to mouse DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:961-6.
21. Munro S. GM food debate. Lancet 1999; 354:1728.
22. Kilpatrick DC. GM food debate. Lancet 1999: 354:1728.
23. Fenton B, Stanley K, Fenton S, Bolton-Smith C. Lancet 1999;354:1728.
24. Wëuthrich B. Food additives and genetically modified food: a risk for allergic patients? Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 1999;88:609-14.
25. Opara EL, Oehlschlager SL, Hanley AB. Immunoglobulin E mediated food allergy. Modelling and application of diagnostic and predictive tests for existing and novel foods. Biomarkers 1998;3:1-19.
26. Wal JM. Assessment of allergic potential of novel foods. Nahrung 1999;43:168-74.
27. Ruibal-Mendieta NL, Nagy AM, Lints FA. The potential allergenicity of novel foods. J Sci Food Agr 1997;75:405-11.
28. Ludwicks JK. Genetically modified organisms (GMO): toxicological aspects. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig 1998;49:253-63.
29. Bateson PPG. Genetically modified potatoes. Lancet 1999;354-1382.
30. Internet: www.royalsoc.ac.uk/st_pol54.htm. Review of data on possible toxicity of GM potatoes, 1999.
31. Christie B. Scientists call for moratorium on genetically modified foods. BMJ 1999; 318:483.
32. Jones L. Genetically modified foods. BMJ 1999;318:581-4.
33. Dixon B. The paradoxes of genetically modified foods. A climate of mistrust is obscuring the many different facets of genetic modification. BMJ 1999;318:547-8.
34. Beecham L. Chief medical officer clears genetically modified foods. BMJ 1999,318:1441.
35. Plugge E. The paradoxes of genetically modified foods. BMJ 1999;318:1694.
36. Long-term effect of GM crops serves up food for thought [brief]. Nature 1999;398:651-3.
37. Bright S, Schuh W. Making sense of GM tomatoes. Nature 1999;400:I4.
38. Reichhardt T. US sends mixed message in GM debate. Nature 1999;400:298.
39. Millstone E, Brunner E, Mayer S. Beyond «substanctal equivalence». Nature 1999; 401: 525-6.
40. Millstone E, Brunner E, Mayer S. Seaking clarity in the debate over the safety of GM foods. Nature 1999;402:575.
41. Trewavas A, Leaver CJ. Conventional crops are the test of GM prejudice. Nature 1999; 401:640.
42. Kearns P, Mayers P. Substantial equivalence is a useful tool. Nature 1999;401:640.
43. Burke D. No GM conspiracy. Nature 1999; 401:640-1.
44. Taylor SL, Hefle SL. Seaking clarity in the debate over the safety of GM foods. Nature 1999;402:575.
45. Donaldson L, May R. Health implications of genetically modified foods. 1999, Internet: www.doh.gov.uk/gmfood.htm.
46. Informe sobre el protocole de bioseguridad, 2000. Internet: www.greenpeace.es/trans2000.htm.