Contact sensitivity to nickel and other metals in jewelry reactors

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Volumn 43, Issue 1 I, 2000, Pages 31-36

  Gawkrodger, D J ^a   Lewis, F M ^a   Shah, M ^a  

^a ROYAL HALLAMSHIRE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; ANTIGEN; CHROMIC ACID; CHROMIUM; COBALT; GOLD; NICKEL; PALLADIUM; PLATINUM;

ARTICLE; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTACT SENSITIVITY; CONTACT SENSITIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATCH TEST; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE;

EID: 0033936020     PISSN: 01909622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2000.107235     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. AJG McDonagh AL Wright MJ Cork DJ Gawkrodger Nickel sensitivity: the influence of ear piercing and atopy Br J Dermatol 126 1992 16 18
2. NH Nielsen T Menné Nickel sensitization and ear piercing in an unselected Danish population Contact Dermatitis 29 1993 16 21
3. M Kieffer Nickel sensitivity: relationship between history and patch test reaction Contact Dermatitis 5 1979 398 401
4. R Fedler K Strömer Nickel sensitivity in atopics, psoriatics and healthy subjects Contact Dermatitis 29 1993 65 69
5. H Möller Å Svensson Metal sensitivity: positive history but negative test indicates atopy Contact Dermatitis 14 1986 57 60
6. E Cronin Patch testing with nickel Contact Dermatitis 1 1975 56 57
7. AY Mendelow A Forsyth AT Florence AJ Baille Patch testing for nickel allergy; the influence of the vehicle on the response to topical nickel sulphate Contact Dermatitis 13 1985 29 33
8. C Lidén Nickel in jewelry and associated products Contact Dermatitis 26 1992 73 75
9. DJ Todd D Burrows Patch testing with pure palladium metal in patients with sensitivity to palladium chloride Contact Dermatitis 26 1992 327 331
10. JG Camarasa D Burrows T Menné Palladium contact sensitivity Contact Dermatitis 24 1991 370 371
11. C Romaguera F Grimalt J Vilaplana Contact dermatitis from nickel: an investigation of its sources Contact Dermatitis 19 1988 52 57
12. LK Dotterud ES Falk Metal allergy in north Norwegian schoolchildren and its relationship with ear piercing and atopy Contact Dermatitis 31 1994 308 313
13. F de Fine Olivarius T Menné Contact dermatitis from metallic palladium in patients reacting to palladium chloride Contact Dermatitis 27 1992 71 73
14. W Aberer H Holub R Strohal R Slavicek Palladium in dental alloys: the dermatologists’ responsibility to warn? Contact Dermatitis 28 1993 163 165
15. H Hackel K Miller P Elsner G Burg Unusual combined sensitization to palladium and other metals Contact Dermatitis 24 1991 131 132
16. T van Joost ID Roesyanto-Mahadi Combined sensitization to palladium and nickel Contact Dermatitis 22 1990 227 228
17. A Boman JE Wahlberg Experimental sensitization with palladium chloride in the guinea pig Contact Dermatitis 23 1990 256
18. DJ Gawkrodger Nickel sensitivity and the implantation of orthopaedic prostheses Contact Dermatitis 28 1993 257 259
19. E Cronin Metals Contact dermatitis 1980 Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh 279 390
20. B Björkner M Bruze H Möller High frequency of contact allergy to gold sodium thiosulfate: an indication of gold allergy? Contact Dermatitis 30 1994 144 151
21. SD Madden JK Martel JG Marks Self-interpretation of nickel Accupatch testing by jewelry-sensitive subjects Am J Contact Dermatitis 4 1993 3 7
22. T Fischer HI Maibach Easier patch testing with TRUE test J Am Acad Dermatol 20 1989 447 453
23. RL Rietschel JG Marks RM Adams Comparison of patch testing methods: preliminary studies of the TRUE test patch test system in the United States J Am Acad Dermatol 21 1989 841 843
24. M Ruhnek-Forsbeck T Fischer B Meding Comparative multicenter studies with TRUE test and Finn chambers in eight Swedish hospitals J Am Acad Dermatol 21 1989 846 849
25. R Gollhausen B Przybilla J Ring Reproducibility of patch test results: comparison of TRUE test and Finn chamber test results J Am Acad Dermatol 21 1989 843 846
26. LM Wall CD Calnan Occupational nickel dermatitis in the electroforming industry Contact Dermatitis 6 1980 14 20
27. K Kalimo K Lammintausta 24 and 48 hour allergen exposure in patch testing Contact Dermatitis 10 1984 25 29
28. KE Andersen C Lidén J Hansen A Vølund Dose-response testing with nickel sulphate using the TRUE test in nickel-sensitive individuals: multiple nickel sulphate patch-test reactions do not cause an ‘angry back’ Br J Dermatol 129 1993 50 56
29. J McLelland S Shuster Contact dermatitis with negative patch tests: the additive effect of allergens in combination Br J Dermatol 122 1990 623 630