The effects of pressure to report more details on memories of an eyewitness event

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 271-282

  Winningham, Robert G ^a   Weaver III, Charles A ^a  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIFE EVENT; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; WITNESS;

EID: 0033935201     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541446.2000.10708707     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bekerian, D.A., Dennett, J.L., Hill, K., & Hitchcock, R. (1992). Effects of detailed imagery on simulated witness recall. In F. Losel (Ed.), Psychology and law (pp. 302-308). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
2. Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Stuve, T.E. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-55.
3. Dasgupta, A.M., Fisher, T.J., Hines, K.A., & Larson, K.K. (1996). Effects of post-hypnotic suggestions, academic incentives and compliance to authority on students' effort to remember. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 16, 51-61.
4. Dwyan, J., & Bowers, K.S. (1983). The use of hypnosis to enhance recall. Science, 222, 184-185.
5. Geiselman, R.E., Fisher, R.P., MacKinnon, D.P., & Holland, H.L. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement in police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2, 401-412.
6. Kelemen, W.L., & Winningham, R.G. (1999, November). Practice increases mean metacognitive accuracy but not the reliability of individual differences? Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomics Society, Los Angeles, CA.
7. Leippe, M.R. (1980). Effects of integrative and memorial cognitive processes on the correspondence of eyewitness accuracy and confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 261-274.
8. Lindsay, R.C.L., Wells, G.L., & Rumpel, C. (1981). Can people detect eyewitness identification accuracy within and across situation? Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 79-89.
9. Loftus, E.F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560-572.
10. Loftus, E.F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Loftus, E.F., Miller, D.G., & Burns, H.J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31.
12. Loftus, E.F., & Palmer, J.P. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile construction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589.
13. Luus, C.A.E., & Wells, G.L. (1994). Eyewitness identification confidence. In D.F. Ross, D.J. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 348-361). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Nelson, T.O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
15. Nelson, T.O. (1996). Gamma is a measure of the accuracy of predicting performance on one item relative to another item, not of the absolute performance of an individual item. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 257-260.
16. Weingardt, K.R., Leonesio, R.J., & Loftus, E.F. (1994). Viewing eyewitness research from a metacognitive perspective. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 157-184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Wells, G.L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 553-571.
18. Wells, G.L., Fergunson, T.J., & Lindsay, R.C.J. (1981). The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of fact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 688-696.
19. Wells, G.L., & Murray, D.M. (1984). Eyewitness confidence. In G.L. Wells & E.F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 155-170). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.