Plenary address: Conserving adaptive variation in forest ecosystems

Journal of Sustainable Forestry

Volumn 10, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 1-12

  Aitken, S N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION PLANNING; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; GENETIC RESOURCE;

EID: 0033935063     PISSN: 10549811     EISSN: 1540756X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J091v10n01_01     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aitken, S. N. and W. J. Libby. 1994. Evolution of the pygmy-forest edaphic subspecies of Pinus contorta across an ecological staircase. Evolution 48:1009-1019.
2. Campbell, R. K. 1987. Biogeographical limits of in Southwest Oregon. For. Ecol. And Mgmt. 18:1-34.
3. Campbell, R. K. 1979. Genecology of in a watershed in the Oregon Cascades. Ecology 60:1036-1050.
4. Campbell, R. K. and A. I. Sugano. 1979. Genecology of bud-burst phenology in: Response to flushing temperature and chilling. Bot. Gaz. 140(2):223-231.
5. Copes, D. L. 1991. Isoenzyme uniformity in western red cedar seedlings fromOregon and Washington. Can. J. For. Res. 11:451-453.
6. Falconer, D. S. and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th Ed. Longman Sci. and Tech., Harlow, U. K.
7. Franklin, I. R. 1980. Evolutionary changes in small populations. In M. E. Soule and B. A. Wilcox (Eds.), Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp. 135-149.
8. Geber, M. A. and T. E. Dawson. 1993. Evolutionary responses of plants to global change. In P. M. Kareiva, J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Huey (Eds.), Biotic Interactions and Global Change. Sinauer Associates, Inc., pp. 179-197.
9. Gooding, G. 1998. Genetic variation and mating system of Ponderosa pine in the Willamette Valley. M. Sc. thesis, Department of Forest Sciences, Oregon State University.
10. Hindar, K., N. Ryman and F. Utter. 1991. Genetic effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48:945-957.
11. Holsinger, K. S. 1993. The evolutionary dynamics of fragmented plant populations. In P. M. Kareiva, J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Huey (Eds.), Biotic Interactions and Global Change. Sinauer Associates, Inc., pp. 198-216.
12. Huntley, B. 1991. How plants respond to climate change:Migration rates, individualism and the consequences for plant communities. Annals of Botany 67:15-22.
13. Kavanagh, K. L., B. J. Yoder, S. N. Aitken, B. L. Gartner and S. Knowe. 1998. Root and shoot vulnerability to xylem cavitation in four populations of seedlings. Tree Physiology. In press.
14. Lande, R. 1995. Mutation and conservation. Conservation Biology 9(4): 782-791.
15. Ledig, F. T. and J. H. Kitzmiller. 1992. Genetic strategies for reforestation in the face of global climate change. For. Ecol. & Mgmt. 50:153-169.
16. Lesica, P. and F. W. Allendorf. 1995. When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Cons. Biol. 9(4):753-760.
17. Lewontin, R. C. 1984. Detecting population differences in quantitative characters as opposed to gene frequencies. Am. Nat. 123(1):115-124.
18. Millar, C. I. and W. J. Libby. 1991. Strategies for conserving clinal, ecotypic and disjunct population diversity in widespread species. In D. A. Falk and K. E. Holsinger (Eds.), Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, pp. 149-170.
19. Lynch, M. 1996. A quantitative-genetic perspective on conservation issues. In J. C Avise and J. L. Hamrick (Eds.), Conservation Genetics: Case Studies from Nature. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 471-501
20. Lynch, M., J. Conery and R. Burger. 1995. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am. Nat. 146(4):489-518.
21. Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, MA, 980 pp.
22. Lynch, M. and R. Lande. 1993. Evolution and extinction in response to environmental change. In P. M. Kareiva, J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Huey (Eds.), Biotic Interactions and Global Change. Sinauer Associates, Inc. pp. 234-250.
23. Moritz, C. 1994. Defining ‘Evolutionarily Significant Units’ for conservation. TREE 9(10):373-375.
24. Namkoong, G. 1989. Population genetics and the dynamics of conservation. In L. Knutson and A. K. Stoner (Eds.), Biotic Diversity and Germplasm Preservation, Global Imperatives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
25. Rehfeldt, G. E. 1995. Genetic variation, climate models and the ecological genetics of Larix occidentalis. For. Ecol. Mgmt. 78:21-37.
26. Rehfeldt, G. E. 1993. Genetic structure of western red cedar populations in the Interior West. Can. J. For. Res. 24:670-680.
27. Riggs, L. R. 1982. Genetic resources: An assessment and plan for California. California gene resource program, Sacramento.
28. Sorensen, F. C. 1969. Embryonic genetic load in coastal Douglas fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii. American Naturalist 103: 389-398.
29. Sorensen, F. C. and R. S. Miles. 1974. Self-pollination effects on Douglas fir and ponderosa pine seeds and seedlings. Silvae Genet. 23:135-138.
30. Soule, M. E. 1980. Thresholds for survival: Maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential. In M. E. Soule and B. A. Wilcox (Eds.), Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp. 151-170.
31. Stettler, R. F. and H. D. Bradshaw. 1994. The choice of genetic material formechanistic studies of adaptation in forest trees. Tree Physiology 14: 781-796.
32. Turelli, M. 1984. Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch’s zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor. Pop. Biol. 25:138-193.
33. White, T. L. 1987. Drought tolerance of southwestern Oregon Douglas fir. Forest Science 33(2): 283-293.
34. Yanchuk, A. D. and D. T. Lester. 1996. Setting priorities for conservation of the conifer genetic resources ofBritishColumbia. The ForestryChronicle 72(4):406-415.
35. Zhang, J. W., L. Fins and J. D. Marshall. 1994. Stable carbon isotope discrimination, photosynthetic gas exchange, and growth differences among western larch families. Tree Physiol. 14:531-539.