Epidural analgesia with sufentanil during labor and operative delivery

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 79, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 538-542

  Amer Wahlin, Isis ^a   Christoffersson, Magnus ^a   Dahlgren, Nils ^a   Rydhstroem, Hakan ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b HELSINGBORG HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Epidural analgesia; Opioids; Risk of operative delivery

Indexed keywords

LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; SUFENTANIL;

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SWEDEN;

ADULT; ANALGESIA, EPIDURAL; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RISK FACTORS; SUFENTANIL;

EID: 0033934924     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079007538.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. 1. Morgan B, Bulpitt CJ, Clifton P, Lewis PJ. Effectiveness of pain relief in labour: survey of 1000 mothers. BMJ 1982; 285: 689-90.
2. 2. Reynolds F. Epidural analgesia in obstetrics. Pros and cons for mother and baby. BMJ 1989; 299: 751-2.
3. 3. Robinson J, Rosen M, Evans JM, Revill SI, David H, Rees GAD. Maternal opinion about analgesia for labour. A controlled trial between epidural block and intramuscular pethidine combined with inhalation. Anesthesia 1980; 35: 1173-81.
4. 4. Peaceman AM, Lopez-Zeno JA, Minogue JP, Socol ML. Factors that influence route of delivery. Active versus traditional labor management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 940-4.
5. 5. Read MD, Hunt LP, Anderton JM, Lieberman BA. Epidural block and the progress and outcome of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 4: 35-9.
6. 6. Walton P, Reynolds F. Epidural analgesia and instrumental delivery. Anesthesia 1984; 39: 218-23.
7. 7. Willdeck-Lund G, Lindmark G, Nilsson BA. Effect of segmental epidural analgesia upon the uterine activity with special reference to the use of different local anesthetic agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1979; 23: 519-28.
8. 8. Newton ER, Schroeder BC, Knape KG, Bennett BL. Epidural analgesia and uterine function. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 749-55.
9. 9. Thorp JA, Parisi VM, Boylan PC, Johnston DA. The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 670-5.
10. 10. Gribble RK, Meier PR. Effect of epidural analgesia on the primary cesarean section rate. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 231-4.
11. 11. Chestnut DH, Owen CL, Bates JN et al. Continuous infusion epidural analgesia during labour. A randomized double-blind comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine. Anesthesiology 1988; 68: 754-9.
12. 12. Vertommen JD, Vandermeulen E, Van Aken H et al. The effects of the addition of sufentanil to 0.125% bupivacaine on the quality of analgesia during labour and on the incidence of the instrumental deliveries. Anesthesiology 1991; 74: 809-14.
13. 13. Olofsson C, Ekblom A, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Irestedt L. Obstetric outcome following epidural analgesia with bupivacaine-epinephrine 0.25% or bupivacaine 0.125% with sufentanil - a prospective randomized controlled study in 1000 parturients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42: 284-92.
14. 14. Cnattingius S, Ericson A, Gunnarskog J, Källén B. A quality study of a Medical Birth Registry. Scand J Soc Med 1990; 18: 143-8.
15. 15. Miettinen O. Simple interval estimation of risk ratio. Am J Epidemiol 1974; 100: 515-16.
16. 16. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Nat Can Inst 1959; 22: 719-48.
17. 17. Jouppila R, Pihlajaniemi R, Hollmen A, Louppila P. Segemental epidural analgesia and post partum sequelae. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1978; 67: 85-8.
18. 18. Crawford JS. Lumbar epidural block in labour: a clinical analysis. Br J Anaesth 1972; 44: 66-74.
19. 19. Harris RE. Post partum urinary retention: Role of antimicrobial therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 133: 174-5.
20. 20. Andolf E, Iosif CS, Jørgensen C, Rydhström H. Insidious urinary retention after vaginal delivery: Prevalence and symptoms at follow-up in a population-based study. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1994; 38: 51-3.