Editorial: Women in NIH-funded research studies: There's good news, and there's bad news

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 463-464

  Greenberger, Phyllis ^a   Marts, Sherry A ^a  

^a Society for Women's Health Research   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; EDITORIAL; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

FEMALE; HUMANS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH SUPPORT; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 0033934456     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/15246090050073503     Document Type: Editorial

References (3)

1. Vidaver RM, LaFleur B, Tong C, et al. Women subjects in NIH-funded clinical research literature: Lack of progress in both representation and analysis by sex. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2000;9:495.
2. Montgomery CH, Sherif K. The information problem in women's health: A piece of the solution. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2000;9:529.
3. United States General Accounting Office. 2000 Report to Congressional Requesters: Women's Health: NIH Has Increased in Its Efforts to Include Women in Research. U. S. Government Printing Office.