Model-based condition index for tracking gear wear and fatigue damage

Wear

Volumn 241, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 26-32

  Li, C James ^a   Limmer, J D ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Condition index; Fatigue damage; Gear wear

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; GEAR TEETH; LIFE CYCLE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STIFFNESS;

CONDITION INDEX; FATIGUE DAMAGE;

FATIGUE OF MATERIALS;

CONDITION MONITORING; FATIGUE; FATIGUE ANALYSIS; MODEL; WEAR;

EID: 0033933104     PISSN: 00431648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00356-2     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Aatola S., Leskinen R. Cepstrum analysis predicts gearbox failure. Noise Control Eng. J. 34(2):1990;53-59.
2. Handbook of Loss Prevention. 1978;Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
3. Braun S. Mechanical Signature Analysis: Theory and Application. 1986;Academic Press, Harcourt Brace Jovanoich, NY.
4. Rangwala S., Dornfield D. Sensor integration using neural networks for intelligent tool condition monitoring. ASME J. Eng. Ind. 112:1990;219-228.
5. Shipley G. Twelve ways to load-test gears. Prod. Eng. 1958;77-82.
6. Stewart R.M. Some useful data analysis techniques for gearbox diagnostics. Report MHM/R10/77. 1977;Machine Health Monitoring Group, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton.
7. Zakrajsek J.J., Townsend D.P., Decker H.J. An analysis of gear fault detection methods as applied to pitting fatigue failure data. Proceedings of the 47th Meeting of the Mechanical Failures Prevention Group:1993;199-208.