Combining advanced technology noise control solutions

Seminars in Hearing

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 169-177

  Schum, Donald J ^a  

^a Oticon Inc USA   (United States)

Author keywords

Directionality; Hearing aids; Hearing loss; Speech understanding

Indexed keywords

FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MICROPHONE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

EID: 0033929199     PISSN: 07340451     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Cornelisse, L., Seewald, R., & Jamieson, D. (1994). Fitting wide dynamic range compression hearing aids: The DSL [i/o] approach. The Hearing Journal, 47, 23-29.
2. Dillon, H. (1999). NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids. The Hearing Journal, 52, 10-16.
3. Elberling, C., & Schum, D. (1996). A new digital hearing instrument. The Hearing Review, May, 38-39.
4. Dillon, H. (1996). Compression? Yes, but for low or high frequencies, for low or high intensities, and with what response times? Ear & Hearing, 17, 287-307.
5. Hickson, L. & Byrne, D. (1997). Consonant perception in quiet: Effect of increasing the consonant-vowel ratio with compression amplification. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 8, 322-332.
6. Kuk, F. (1998). Rationale and requirements for a slow-acting compression hearing aid. The Hearing Journal, 51, 45-53, 79.
7. Neuman, A., Bakke, M., Mackersie, C., Hellman, S., & Levitt, H. (1998). The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 2273-2281.
8. Souza, P. & Turner, C. (1998). Multichannel compression, temporal cues, and audibility. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 41, 315-326.
9. Boymans, M., Dreschler, W., Schoneveld, P., & Verschuure, H. (1999). Clinical evaluation of a full-digital in-the-ear hearing instrument. Audiology, 38, 99-108.
10. Humes, L., Christensen, L., Thomas, T., Bess, F., Headly-Williams, A., & Bentler, R. (1999). A comparison of the aided performance and benefit provided by a linear and a two-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing aid. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 65-79.
11. Walden, B., Surr, R., Cord, M., & Pavlovic, C. (1998). A clinical trial of the ReSound BT2 personal hearing system. American Journal of Audiology, 7, 85-100.
12. Schum, D. (1996b). Adaptive Speech Alignment: A new fitting rationale made possible by DSP. The Hearing Journal, 49, 25-30.
13. Fabry, D. (1991). Signal processing hearing aids with the pediatric population. In J. Fegin & P. Stelmachowicz (Eds.), Pediatric Amplification: Proceedings of the 1991 National Conference, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha.
14. Edwards, B., Hou, Z., Struck, C., & Dharan, P. (1998). Signal-processing algorithms for a new software-based, digital hearing device. The Hearing Journal, 51, 44-52.
15. Kochkin, S. (1996). Customer satisfaction & subjective benefit with high performance hearing aids. The Hearing Review, 3, 16-26.
16. Warland, A., Traeland, G., Myhr, M., & Arntsen, O. (1997). Rapport om effekten av to forkjellige typer digitale horeapparater sammenlignet med analoge. Report of Rikstrygdeverkets radgivende gruppe - horeapparater to the Norwegian Government, September.
17. rd Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, New York, NY
18. Hawkins, D. (1984). Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly-to-moderately hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 409-418.
19. Picard, M., & LeFrancois, J. (1986). Speech perception through FM auditory trainers in noise and reverberation. Journal of Rehabilitation and Research Development, 23, 53-62.
20. Schum, D. (1999a). Clinical procedures for mating advanced technology hearing aids with FM systems. News from Oticon, June.
21. Ricketts, T., & Dhar, S. (1999). Comparison of performance across three directional hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10, 180-189.
22. Schum, D. (1996). Speech Understanding in Background Noise. In M. Valente (Ed.), Hearing Aids: Standards, Options, and Limitations. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
23. Naylor, G. (1997). E63 SKI Field Test. Helsingor, Denmark: Oticon Research Center, report 45-8-2.
24. Killion, M., Schulein, R., Christensen, L., Fabry, D., Revit, L., Niquette, P., & Chung, K. (1998). Real-world performance of an ITE directional microphone. The Hearing Journal, 51, 24-38.