Description of an intraperitoneal tumour xenograft survival model in the pig

European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 393-397

  Reymond, M A ^a   Tannapfel, A ^b   Schneider, C ^c   Scheidbach, H ^c   Kover S ^c   Jung, A ^c   Reck, T ^c   Kockerling F ^c   Lippert, H ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artificial; Laparoscopy; Neoplasm seeding; Neoplasm transplantation; Pneumoperitoneum; Swine

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CANCER GRAFT; CANCER RESEARCH; COLON RESECTION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HELA CELL; HUMAN; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGMOID; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SWINE; XENOGRAFT;

EID: 0033925133     PISSN: 07487983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0905     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Mount LE, Ingram DL. The pig as a laboratory animal. London: Academic Press. 1971;1-175.
2. Tagaki S. Hepatic and portal vein blood flow during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic hepatectomy. Surg Endosc. 12:1998;427-431.
3. Greif WM, Forse RA. Hemodynamic effects of the laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum during sepsis in a porcine endotoxic shock model. Ann Surg. 227:1998;474-480.
4. Chen MD, Teigen CA, Reynolds HT, Johnson PR, Fowler JM. Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy: an evaluation of adhesion formation after pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in a porcine model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 178:1998;499-503.
5. Jacobi CA, Ordemann J, Bohm M, Zieren HU, Sabat R, Muller JM. Inhibition of peritoneal tumor cell growth and implantation in laparoscopic surgery in a rat model. Am J Surg. 174:1997;359-363.
6. Reymond MA, Kastl S, Schneider C, Hohenberger W, Köckerling F. Techniques for the prevention of port-site metastases. Surg Endosc. 11:1997;533.
7. Franklin ME, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D, et al. Prospective Comparison of Open vs. Laparoscopic Colon Surgery for Carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 39:1996;S35-S46.
8. Allardyce RA, Morreau P, Bagshaw PF. Operative factors affecting tumor cell distribution following laparoscopic colectomy in a porcine model. Dis Colon Rectum. 40:1997;939-945.
9. Allardyce RA, Morreau PN, Frizelle FA, Bagshaw PF. Tumour cell wound distribution after colectomy in a porcine model. Aust NZ J Surg. 68:1998;363-366.
10. Jones DB, Guo LW, Reinhard MK, et al. Impact of Pneumoperitoneum on Trocar Site Implantation of Colon Cancer in Hamster Model. Dis Colon Rectum. 38:1995;1182-1188.
11. Berguer R, Gutt CN. Laparoscopic colon surgery in a rat model. A preliminary report. Surg Endosc. 8:1994;1195-1197.
12. Allardyce R, Morreau P, Bagshaw P. Tumor Cell Distribution Following Laparoscopic Colectomy in a Porcine Model. Dis Colon Rectum. 39:1996;S47-S52.
13. Wunderlich J, Shearer G. In: Coligan JE, Kruisbeek AM, Margulies DH, Shevach EM, Strober W, eds, Current Protocols in Immunology. New York: Wiley & Sons Inc. 1994.
14. Reymond MA, Schneider C, Hohenberger W, Köckerling F. The pathogenesis of port-site recurrences. J Gastrointest Surg. 2:1998;406-414.
15. Protection des animaux. Berne: Swiss Federal Veterinary Office. 1994.
16. Hewett PJ, Thomas WM, King G, Eaton M. Intraabdominal Cell Movement During Abdominal Carbon Dioxide Isufflation and Laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 39:1996;S62-S66.
17. Thomas WM, Eaton MC, Hewett PJ. A proposed model for the movement of cells within the abdominal cavity during CO2 insufflation and laparoscopy. N Z J Surg. 66:1996;105-106.
18. Texler ML, Luck A, Hewett PJ, King G, Anderson D, Chatterton B. A real time in vivo model of intraperitoneal movement of tumour cells during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 12:1998;518 (Abstract).
19. Berguer R, Gutt C, Stiegmann GV. Laparoscopic surgery in the rat. Description of a new technique. Surg Endosc. 7:1993;345-347.