MR evaluation ex vivo and in vivo of a covered stent-graft for abdominal aortic aneurysms: Ferromagnetism, heating, artifacts, and velocity mapping

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 112-121

  Engellau, Lena ^a   Olsrud, Johan ^a   Brockstedt, Sara ^a   Albrechtsson, Ulf ^a   Norgren, Lars ^a   Ståhlberg, Freddy ^a   Larsson, Elna Marie ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Aneurysm; Aorta; Aortic; Artifacts; Blood; Flow dynamics; Grafts and prostheses; MR imaging; Safety

Indexed keywords

FERROMAGNETIC MATERIAL; GADODIAMIDE; IOHEXOL; NICKEL; TITANIUM;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEATING; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; STENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; ARTIFACTS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HEATING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETICS; MALE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; TITANIUM; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 0033918324     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<112::AID-JMRI13>3.0.CO;2-G     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1991;5:491-499.
2. Volodos NL, Karpovich IP, Troyan VI, et al. Clinical experience of the use of self-fixing synthetic prostheses for remote endoprosthetics of the thoracic and the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries through the femoral artery and as intraoperative endoprosthesis for aorta reconstruction. Vasa Suppl 1991;33:93-95.
3. Parodi JC. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms and other arterial lesions. J Vase Surg 1995;21:549-555; discussion 556-547.
4. Blum U, Langer M, Spillner G, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: preliminary technical and clinical results with transfemoral placement of endovascular self-expanding stent-grafts [see comments]. Radiology 1996;198:25-31.
5. Murphy KD, Richter GM, Henry M, et al. Aortoiliac aneurysms: management with endovascular stent-graft placement. Radiology 1996;198:473-480.
6. Ernst CB. Abdominal aortic aneurysm [see comments]. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1167-1172.
7. Rozenblit A, Marin ML, Veith FJ, et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of postoperative follow-up with helical CT. AJR 1995;165:1473-1479.
8. Dorffher R, Thurnher S, Polterauer P, Kretschmer G, Lammer J. Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with transfemoral placement of stent-grafts: complications and secondary radiologic intervention. Radiology 1997;204:79-86.
9. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:877-881.
10. Leung DA, McKinnon GC, Davis CP, et al. Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1996; 200:569-571.
11. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology 1997;204:357-362.
12. Hilfiker PR, Quick HH, Debatin JF. Plain and covered stent-grafts: in vitro evaluation of characteristics at three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1999;211:693-697.
13. Engellau L, Larsson EM, Albrechtsson U, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and MR angiography of endoluminally treated abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vase Endovasc Surg 1998;15:212-219.
14. Shellock FG. Pocket guide to MR procedures and metallic objects: update 1998. New York: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p 1-9, 23-24.
15. New PF, Rosen BR, Brady TJ, et al. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1983;147:139-148.
16. Soulen RL, Budinger TF, Higgins CB. Magnetic resonance imaging of prosthetic heart valves. Radiology 1985;154:705-707.
17. Teitelbaum GP, Bradley WG, Jr., Klein BD. MR imaging artifacts, ferromagnetism, and magnetic torque of intravascular filters, stents, and coils. Radiology 1988;166:657-664.
18. Shellock FG, Crues JV. High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces. AJR 1988;151:389-392.
19. Shellock FG, Schatz CJ. Metallic otologic implants: in vitro assessment of ferromagnetism at 1.5 T. AJNR 1991;12:279-281.
20. Shellock FG, Meeks T. Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism and artifacts for implantable vascular access ports exposed to a 1.5-T MR imager. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991;1:243.
21. Nogueira M, Shellock FG. Otologic bioimplants: ex vivo assessment of ferromagnetism and artifacts at 1.5 T. AJR 1994;163:1472-1473.
22. Fagan LL, Shellock FG, Brenner RJ, Rothman B. Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts of breast tissue expanders exposed to a 1.5-T MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5: 614-616.
23. Shellock FG, Nogueira M, Morisoli S. MR imaging and vascular access ports: ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:481-484.
24. Schueler BA, Parrish TB, Lin JC, et al. MRI compatibility and visibility assessment of implantable medical devices. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:596-603.
25. Shellock FG. Compatibility of an endoscope designed for use in interventional MR imaging procedures. AJR 1998;171:1297-1300.
26. Davis PL, Crooks L, Arakawa M, et al. Potential hazards in NMR imaging: heating effects of changing magnetic fields and RF fields on small metallic implants. AJR 1981;137:857-860.
27. Buchli R, Boesiger P, Meier D. Heating effects of metallic implants by MRI examinations. Magn Reson Med 1988;7:255-261.
28. Zhang J, Wilson CL, Levesque MF, Behnke EJ, Lufkin RB. Temperature changes in nickel-chromium intracranial depth electrodes during MR scanning. AJNR 1993;14:497-500.
29. Shellock FG. MR imaging and cervical fixation devices: evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 Tesla. Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14:1093-1098.
30. Laissy JP, Grand C, Matos C, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of intravascular endoprostheses: investigation of three devices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1995;18:360-366.
31. Underwood SR, Firmin DN, Klipstein RH, Rees RS, Longmore DB. Magnetic resonance velocity mapping: clinical application of a new technique. Br Heart J 1987;57:404-412.
32. Klipstein RH, Firmin DN, Underwood SR, Rees RS, Longmore DB. Blood flow patterns in the human aorta studied by magnetic resonance. Br Heart J 1987;58:316-323.
33. Firmin DN, Nayler GL, Klipstein RH, et al. In vivo validation of MR velocity imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:751-756.
34. Henriksen O, Stahlberg F, Thomsen C, Mogelvang J, Persson B. In vivo evaluation of femoral blood flow measured with magnetic resonance. Acta Radiol 1989;30:153-157.
35. Amanuma M, Mohiaddin RH, Hasegawa M, Heshiki A, Longmore DB. Abdominal aorta: characterization of blood flow and measurement of its regional distribution by cine magnetic resonance phase-shift velocity mapping. Eur Radiol 1992;2:559-564.
36. Bogren HG, Buonocore MH. Blood flow measurements in the aorta and major arteries with MR velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4:119-130.
37. Stahlberg F, Sondergaard L, Thomsen C. MR flow quantification with cardiovascular applications: a short overview. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1995;410:49-56.