Dual displays

Ergonomics

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 764-770

  Tlauka, Michael ^a   Stanton, Danae ^b   McKenna, Frank P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aircraft displays; Attention; Frames of reference; Maps

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AIRCRAFT; AIRPLANE PILOT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; DISPLAY SYSTEM; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; REFERENCE VALUE; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STAFF TRAINING; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0033918264     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/001401300404733     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ARETZ, A. J. 1991, The design of electronic map displays, Human Factors, 33, 85-101.
2. DUNCAN, J. 1984, Selective attention and the organization of visual information, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
3. ERIKSEN, C. W. and YEH, Y.-Y. 1985, Allocation of attention in the visual field, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-597.
4. EVANS, G. W. and PEZDEK, K. 1980, Cognitive mapping: knowledge of real-world distance and location information, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human L earning and Memory, 6, 13-24.
5. GATTI, S. V. and EGETH, H. E. 1978, Failure of spatial selectivity in vision, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 181-184.
6. LABERGE, D., CARLSON, R. L., WILLIAMS, J. K. and BUNNEY, B. G. 1997, Shifting attention in visual space: tests of moving-spotlight models versus an activity-distribution model, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1380-1392.
7. LEVINE, M., MARCHON, I. and HANLEY, G. 1984, The placement and misplacement of you-are-here maps, Environment and Behavior, 16, 139-157.
8. PRESSON, C. C., DELANGE, N. and HAZELRIGG, M. D. 1989, Orientation specificity in spatial memory: what makes a path different from a map of the path? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 887-897.
9. SHELTON, A. and MCNAMARA, T. P. 1997, Multiple views of spatial memory, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102-106.
10. SHEPARD, R. N. and HURWITZ, S. 1984, Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps, Cognition, 18, 161-193.
11. SHOLL, M. J. 1987, Cognitive maps as orienting schemata, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615-628.
12. SHOLL, M. J. and NOLIN, T. L. 1997, Orientation specificity in representations of place, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1494-1507.
13. THORNDYKE, P. W. and HAYES-ROTH, B. 1982, Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation, Cognitive Psychology, 14, 560-589.
14. TLAUKA, M. and WILSON, P. N. 1996, Orientation-free representations from navigation through a computer-simulated environment, Environment and Behavior, 28, 647-664.
15. WICKENS, C. D. and LONG, J. 1995, Object versus space-based models of visual attention: implications for the design of head-up displays, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 179-193.
16. WICKENS, C. D. and PREVETT, T. T. 1995, Exploring the dimensions of egocentricity in aircraft navigation displays, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 110-135.
17. WICKENS, C. D., LIANG, C.-C., PREVETT, T. and OLMOS, O. 1996, Electronic maps for terminal area navigation: effects of frame of reference and dimensionality, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 241-271.
18. WILLIAMS, H. P., HUTCHINSON, S. and WICKENS, C. D. 1996, A comparison of methods for promoting geographic knowledge in simulated aircraft navigation, Human Factors, 38, 50-64.