Thoracolumbar spine trauma: Evaluation and management

Current Opinion in Orthopaedics

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 176-185

  Eskenazi, Mark S ^a   Bendo, John A ^a   Spivak, Jeffrey M ^a  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FRACTURE DISLOCATION; HUMAN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPINE FRACTURE; SPINE INJURY; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE STABILIZATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; TREATMENT INDICATION; VERTEBRA BODY;

EID: 0033914544     PISSN: 10419918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001433-200006000-00004     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. 1 Gertzbein SD: Scoliosis Research Society multicenter spine fracture study. Spine 1992, 17;5:528-540.
2. 2 Curry K, Casady L: The relationship between extended periods of immobility and decubitus ulcer formation in the acutely spinal cord injured individual. J Neurosci Nurs 1992, 24;4:185-189.
3. 3 Sjostrom L, Karlstrom G, Pech P, Rauschning W: Indirect spinal canal decompression in burst fractures treated with pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine 1996, 21;1:113-123.
4. 4 Finkelstein JA, Chapman JR, Mirza S: Anterior cortical allograft in thoracolumbar fractures. J Spinal Disord 1999, 12;5:424-429. In this prospective study, the authors used tibial allograft with a core of morcelized vertebral body in reconstruction after thoracolumbar trauma. The fusion rate was 81%, as compared with 96% in previous studies with autogenous iliac crest autograft. However, there was no clinical difference with respect to pain in patients with radiographic fusion compared with those with pseudarthrosis. Maintenance of correction was more consistent with additional posterior instrumentation.
5. 5 Calenoff L, Chessare JW, Rogers LF, et al.: Multiple level spinal injuries: importance of early recognition. Am J Roentgen 1978, 130:665-669.
6. 6 Vaccaro AR, An HS, Lin S, et al.: Noncontiguous injuries of the spine. J Spinal Disord 1992, 5;3:320-329.
7. 7 El-Khoury GY, Whitten CG: Trauma to the upper thoracic spine: anatomy, biomechanics, and unique imaging features. AJR 1993, 160:95-102.
8. 8 McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Fredrickson BE, Lubicky JP: The value of computed tomography in thoracolumbar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 1983, 65A;4:461-473.
9. 9 Seybold EA, Sweeney CA, Fredrickson BE, et al.: Functional outcome of low lumbar burst fractures. Spine 1999, 24;20:2154-2161. In this retrospective review, there was no difference in functional outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatment of low lumbar burst fractures. The majority of patients with neurologic injury underwent surgery, however, making this largely a comparison of nonsurgical treatment of neurologically intact patients and surgical treatment of patients with neurologic deficit. Forty-one percent of the surgically treated patients required reoperation for removal of hardware, kyphosis, or loss of fixation. Progression of kyphosis or vertebral collapse was not significantly different between the two groups.
10. 10 Oner FC, van Gils APG, Dhert WJA, Verbout AJ: MRI findings of thoracolumbar spine fractures: a categorisation based on MRI examinations of 100 fractures. Skeletal Radiol 1999, 28:433-443.
11. 11 Purcell GA, Markolf KL, Dawson EG: Twelfth thoracic-first lumbar vertebral mechanical stability of fractures after harrington-rod instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981, 63(1):71-78.
12. 12 Bohlmann HH: Treatment of fractures and dislocations of the thoracic and lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985, 67(1):165-169.
13. 13 Levine AM, Bosse M, Edwards CC: Bilateral facet dislocations in the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 1988, 13(6):630-640.
14. 14 Esses SI, Botsford DJ, Kostuik JP: Evaluation of surgical treatment for burst fractures. Spine 1990, 15(7):667-673.
15. 15 Kim NH, Lee HM, Chun IM: Neurologic injury and recovery in patients with burst fracture of the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 1999, 24(3):290-294. This retrospective study demonstrated that patients with posterior element disruption (lamina fractures with or without interspinous widening) had both a higher rate of neurologic impairment at presentation but also a higher rate of neurologic improvement at follow-up.
16. 16 Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF, et al.: Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. JAMA 1997, 277(20):1597-1604.
17. 17 Holdsworth FW: Fractures, dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1963, 45:6.
18. 18 Kelly RP, Whitesides TE Jr: Treatment of lumbodorsal fracture-dislocation. Ann Surg 1968, 167:705.
19. 19 Denis F: The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 1983, 8(8):817-831.
20. 20 Ferguson RL, Allen BL: A mechanistic classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures. CORR 1984, 189:77-88.
21. 21 Dall BE, Stauffer S: Neurologic injury and recovery patterns in burst fractures at the T12 or L1 motion segment. CORR 1988, 233:171-176.
22. 22 Bradford DS, Akbarnia BA, Winter RB, Seljeskog EL: Surgical stabilization of fracture and fracture dislocations of the thoracic spine. Spine 1977, 2:185-196.
23. 23 Gaebler C, Maier R, Kutscha-Lissberg F, et al.: Results of spinal cord decompression and thoracolumbar pedicle stabilisation in relation to the time of operation. Spinal Cord 1999, 37:33-39. Patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were treated with short-segment posterior instrumentation, transpedicular disc resection and cancellous bone grafting. Patients treated within 8 hours had significantly higher rates of neurologic recovery than those patients treated later. All patients with incomplete neurologic lesions who were operated on within 48 hours improved at least 1 Frankel grade. After 48 hours, there was no significant difference in the neurologic outcome compared with the time of operation. There was no significant difference in the extent of neurologic recovery with respect to the level of neurologic injury (spinal cord, conus, or cauda equina).
24. 24 McLain RF, Benson DR: Urgent stabilization of spinal fractures in polytrauma patients. Spine 1999, 24(16):1646-1654. This prospective study demonstrates that urgent (〈 24 hours from injury) stabilization of thoracolumbar injuries may be beneficial for some patients with severe, life-threatening injuries. The authors conclude that perioperative complications of infection, pulmonary disease, thromboembolism, and neurologic injury were eliminated by urgent surgical stabilization. Neurologic recovery was more directly related to early (〈 24 hours) intervention and fracture reduction than to the method (anterior vs. posterior) of decompression.
25. 25 Katonis PG, Kontakis GM, Loupasis GA, et al.: Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar spine injuries using Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine 1999, 24(22):2352-2357. The authors retrospectively studied patients with unstable thoracolumbar fractures treated with posterior indirect reduction and instrumented fusion. Patients with greater than 30 degrees of kyphosis and canal compromise greater than 50% were treated with combined anterior and posterior surgery and were excluded. Injuries from T11 to L2 were treated with postural reduction and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) two levels above and one level below the injured vertebrae. Injuries at L3-L4 were treated with postural reduction and PSF one level above and one level below the injury. Patients with complete disruption of the posterior longitudinal ligament underwent posterolateral decompression. All patients with incomplete neurologic injuries improved at least 1 Frankel grade. All patients progressed to solid fusion despite four instrumentation failures, none of which required reoperation.
26. 26 Willen J, Lindahl S, Irstam L, Nordwall A: Unstable thoracolumbar fractures: a study by CT and conventional roentgenology of the reduction effect of Harrington instrumentation. Spine 1984, 9(2):214-219
27. 27 Rechtine GR: Nonsurgical treatment of thoracic and lumbar fractures. Inst Course Lect 1999, 48:413-416.
28. 28 Cantor JB, Lebwohl NH, Garvey T, Eismont FJ: Nonoperative management of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures with early ambulation and bracing. Spine 1993, 18(8):971-976.
29. 29 Louis CA, Gauthier VY, Louis RP: Posterior approach with Louis plates for fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine with and without neurologic deficits. Spine 1998, 23(18):2030-2040.
30. 30 Knight RQ, Stornelli DP, Chan DP, et al.: Comparison of operative versus nonoperative treatment of lumbar burst fractures. CORR 1993, 293;112-121.
31. 31 Rechtine GR, Cahill D, Chrin AM: Treatment of thoracolumbar trauma: comparison of complications of operative versus nonoperative treatment. J Spinal Disord 1999, 12(5):406-409. This large retrospective study demonstrates that aggressive nonoperative treatment of thoracolumbar injuries (excluding ligamentous-only injuries) does not have a higher rate of decubiti, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, or mortality compared with operative treatment. Nonoperative patients were treated for 6 weeks in a Roto-Rest bed. Patients treated surgically had an 11% infection rate. Length of stay was 45 days for the nonoperative group and 21 days for the operative group.
32. 32 Hasegawa K, Takahishi H, Vchiyama S, et al.: An experimental study of a combination method using a pedicle screws and laminar hook for the osteoporotic spine. Spine 1997, 22(9):958-963.
33. 33 Weinstein JN, Collalto P, Lehmann TR: Thoracolumbar"burst" fractures treated conservatively: a long-term follow-up. Spine 1988, 13(1):33-38.
34. 34 de Klerk LW, Fortijne PJ, Stijnen T, et al: Spontaneous remodeling of the spinal canal after conservative management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 1998, 23;9:1057-1060. In patients treated nonoperatively after thoracolumbar burst fracture, average canal stenosis decreased from 50% at presentation to 25% at 1 year follow-up. There was no significant increase after 1 year. Eleven of 16 neurologically impaired patients improved at least 1 Frankel grade and no patients deteriorated neurologically.
35. 35 Mumford J, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Goel VK: Thoracolumbar burst fractures: the clinical efficacy and outcome of nonoperative management. Spine 1993, 18(8):955-970.
36. 36 Shen W, Shen Y: Nonsurgical treatment of three-column thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine 1999, 24(4):412-415. The authors retrospectively reviewed patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior element (lamina, transverse process, and spinous process) fractures in neurologically intact patients. Patients with pedicle or facet fractures or kyphosis of greater than 35 degrees were excluded. There is, however, no mention of posterior column ligamentous injury. Treatment involved limited bedrest with activity as tolerated. Brace wear was not required. There was no correlation between kyphosis, canal compromise, and clinical outcome. Patients compliant and those non-compliant with brace wear had similar clinical outcomes.
37. 37 Been HD, Bouma GJ: Comparison of two types of surgery for thoraco-lumbar burst fractures: combined anterior and posterior stabilisation vs. posterior instrumentation only. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999, 141:349-357. In this retrospective study, the technique of decompression (anterior-direct vs. posterior-indirect) did not influence the rate of neurologic improvement. The anterior group, however, tended to have more severe mechanical and neurologic injuries. Patients treated posteriorly had a high (68%) rate of loss of reduction (〉5 degrees) without an associated higher degree of back pain.
38. 38 Kaneda K, Taneichi H, Abumi K, et al.: Anterior decompression and stabilization with the Kaneda device for thoracolumbar burst fractures associated with neurological deficits. J Bone Joint Surg 1997, 79A(1):69-83.
39. 39 Miyakoshi N, Abe E, Shimada Y, et al.: Anterior decompression with single segmental spinal interbody fusion for lumbar burst fracture. Spine 1999, 24(1):67-73. This retrospective study of seven patients with Denis type B (superior endplate disruption) injuries reports on treatment by hemivertebrectomy of the upper half of the affected vertebral body and one-level fusion with or without instrumentation. There was no accelerated degeneration of the adjacent disk. Patients with instrumented fusion had significantly less correction loss than those not instrumented. Duration of surgery and blood loss were less in this group than in a previously reported group of complete vertebrectomy and two-level fusions.
40. 40 Been HD: Anterior decompression and stabilization of thoracolumbar burst fractures by the use of the Slot-Zielke device. Spine 1991, 16(1):70-77.
41. 41 McLain RF, Sparling E, Benson DR: Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 1993, 75-A(2):162-167.
42. 42 Gardner VO, Armstrong GW: Long-term lumbar facet joint changes in spinal fracture patients treated with Harrington rods. Spine 1990, 15:479-484.
43. 43 Cortet B, Cotton A, Boutry N, et al.: Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an open prospective study. J Rheum 1999, 26(10):2222-2228.
44. 44 Bohlman HH, Kirkpatrick JS, Delamarter RB, Leventhal M: Anterior decompression for late pain and paralysis after fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. CORR 1994, 330:24-29.
45. 45 Melton LJ III, Kan SH, Frye MA, et al.: Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 1989, 129:1000-1011.
46. 46 Byrd JA 3d, Scoles PV, Winter RB, et al.: Adult idiopathic scoliosis treated by anterior and posterior spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg 1987, 69(6):843-850.
47. 47 Johnson JR, Hold RT: Combined use of anterior and posterior surgery for adult scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1988, 19(2):361-370.
48. 48 Coe JD, Warden KE, Herzig MA, McAfee PC: Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants. Spine 1990, 15:902-907.
49. 49 Daftari TK, Horton WC, Hutton WC: Correlations between screw hole preparation, torque of insertion, and pullout strength for spinal screws. J Spinal Disord 1994, 7(2):139-145.
50. 50 Belkoff SM, Maroney M, Fenton DC, Mathis JM: An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of bone cements used in percutaneous vertebroplasty. Bone 1999, 25(92):23S-26S.
51. 51 Tohmeh AG, Mathis JM, Fentorn DC, et al.: Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 1999, 24(7):1772-1776. This in vitro study performed on human cadaveric spines demonstrates that unipedicular injection (6 mL) of PMMA is as effective as bipedicular injection (10 mL total) in restoring vertebral body stiffness after compression fracture. The single injection technique may decrease cost, time, and potential morbidity associated with a second injection.
52. 52 Bostrom MP, Lane JM: Future directions: augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral bodies. Spine 1997, 22(24suppl):S39-42.
53. 53 Martin JB, Sugiu JK, Ruiz SM, et al.: Vertebroplasty: clinical experience and follow-up results. Bone 1999, 25(2):11S-15S. Percutaneous bipedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA afforded complete pain relief in seven of nine patients with osteoporotic compression fractures. Pain relief occurred within 3 days of the procedure. Complications were seen most often in those patients treated for metastatic disease. The authors recommend flouroscopic guidance and vertebral angiography prior to PMMA injection.
54. 54 Jensen ME, Evan AJ, Mathis JM, et al. Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate verteroplasty in the treatment of osteoperotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. American Journal of Neuroradiology 1997, 18(10):1897-1904.
55. 55 Wilkes RA, Mackinnon JG, Thomas JG: Neurological deterioration after cement injection into a vertebral body. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994, 76(1): 155.
56. 56 Gertzbein SD, Court-Brown CM: Flexion-distraction injuries of the lumbar spine: mechanism of injury and classification. Clin Orthop 1988, 227:52-60
57. 57 Grados F, Hardy N, Cayrolle G, et al.: Treatment of vertebral compression fractures by vertebroplasty [abstract]. Rev Rhum (Engl Ed) 1997, 64:38.
58. 58 Bai B, Jazrawi LM, Kummer FJ, Spivak JM: The use of an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute for the prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic vertebra and the management of vertebral compression fractures. Spine 1999, 24(15):1521-1526.