Crossfield effect at fluxgate

Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 176-179

  Ripka, P ^a   Billingsley, S W ^b  

^a CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^b Billingsley Magnetics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY; MAGNETIC FLUX; MAGNETOMETERS; VOLTAGE MEASUREMENT;

CROSSFIELD EFFECT; FLUXGATE SENSORS;

SENSORS;

EID: 0033904072     PISSN: 09244247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0924-4247(99)00082-5     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. P. Ripka, AC - excited magnetoresistive sensor, J. Appl. Phys. 79 (8) (1996) 1-3.
2. F. Primdahl, H. Luhr, E.K. Lauridsen, The effect of large uncompensated transverse fields on the fluxgate magnetic sensor output, Danish Space Research Institute Research Report 1/92, Lyngby, Denmark, 1992, ISSN 0109-6605.
3. P. Brauer, J.M.G. Merayo, O.V. Nielsen, F. Primdahl, J.R. Petersen, Transverse field effect in fluxgate sensors, Sens. Actuators A 59 (1997) 70-74.
4. F. Primdahl, P.A. Jensen, Compact spherical coil for fluxgate magnetometer vector feedback, J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 15 (1982) 221-226.
5. P.K. Ripka, Portable fluxgate magnetometer, Sens. Actuators A 68 (1998) 286-289.
6. P. Ripka, W. Billingsley, Fluxgate: tuned vs. untuned output, IEEE Trans. Magn. 34 (4) (1998) 785.
7. S.W. Billingsley, E.M. Douglas, P. Carosso, Attitude control magnetometer, Spacecraft attitude and guidance conference, Breckenridge, CO, Feb. 1998, proc. in print.
8. K. Pajunpaa, V. Korepanov, E. Klimovich, Calibration system for vector DC Magnetometers, Imeko world congress, Tampere, Finland, 1997, Proc., Vol. IVA, pp. 97-10.
9. E. Moldovanu et al., Comparative study of open-core magnetometric sensor made of Vacoperm 100 and C1 and C2 magnetic amorphous materials, JMMM 154 (1996) 101-106.