Automating support for software evolution in UML

Automated Software Engineering

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 39-59

  Mens, Tom ^a   D'Hondt, Theo ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER HARDWARE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROGRAMMING THEORY;

REUSE CONTRACTS; SOFTWARE EVOLUTION; SOFTWARE LIFECYCLE; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0033901139     PISSN: 09288910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008765200695     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bohner, S.A. and Arnold, R.S. 1996. Software Change Impact Analysis. IEEE Press.
2. De Hondt, K. 1998. A novel approach to architectural recovery in evolving object-oriented systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
3. D'Hondt, M. 1998. Managing evolution of changing software requirements. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
4. Ecklund, E.F., Jr. Delcambre, L.M.L., and Freiling, M.J. 1996. Change cases: Use cases that identify future requirements. In Proc. OOPSLA '96. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 31(10):342-358.
5. Evans, A., France, R., Lano, K., and Rumpe, B. 1999. The UML as a formal modelling notation. In Selected Papers of «UML»'98 International Workshop. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1618, Springer-Verlag, pp. 336-348.
6. Gogolla, M. and Richters, M. 1998. On constraints and queries in UML. The Unified Modeling Language - Technical Aspects and Applications. Physica-Verlag.
7. Hamie, A., Howse, J., Kent, S., Mitchell, R., and Civello, F. 1999. Reflections on the object constraint language. In Selected Papers of «UML»'98 International Workshop. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1618, Springer-Verlag, pp. 162-172.
8. Helm, R., Holland, I.M., and Gangopadhyay, D. 1990. Contracts: specifying behavioral compositions in object-oriented systems. In Proc. OOPSLA/ECOOP'90. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 25(10):169-180.
9. Jacobson, I., Griss, M., Jonsson, P. 1997. Making the reuse business work. IEEE Computer.
10. Kent, S., Evans, A., and Rumpe, B. 1999. UML semantics FAQ. In ECOOP '99 Workshop Reader. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag.
11. Kiczales, G. and Lamping. J. 1992. Issues in the design and documentation of class libraries. In Proc. OOPSLA '92. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 27(10):435-451.
12. Lamping, J. 1993. Typing the specialisation interface. In Proc. OOPSLA '93. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 28(10):201-214.
13. Lucas, C. 1997. Documenting reuse and evolution with reuse contracts. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
14. Mens, T. 1999. A formal foundation for object-oriented software evolution. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
15. Mens, T., Lucas, C., and Steyaert, P. 1999. Supporting reuse and evolution of UML models. In Selected Papers of «UML»'98 International Workshop. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1618, Springer-Verlag, pp. 378-392.
16. Mezini, M. 1997. Maintaining the consistency of class libraries during their evolution. In Proc. OOPSLA'97. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 32(10):1-21.
17. Object Management Group. 1999. Unified modeling language specification version 1.3. OMG Document ad/99-06-08.
18. Opdyke, W.F. 1992. Refactoring object-oriented frameworks. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Technical Report UIUC-DCS-R-92-1759.
19. Övergaard, G. and Palmkvist, K. 1999. A formal approach to use cases and their relationships. In Selected Papers of «UML»'98 International Workshop. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1618, Springer-Verlag, pp. 406-418.
20. Richters, M. and Gogolla, M. 1998. On formalizing the UML object constraint language OCL. In Proc. Int. Conf. Conceptual Modeling, Springer-Verlag.
21. Romero, M. 1999. Managing architectural evolution with reuse contracts. Masters Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
22. Rubin, K.S. and Goldberg, A. 1992. Object behaviour analysis. Communications of the ACM (Special Issue on Object-Oriented Methodologies), 35(9):48-62.
23. Steyaert, P., Lucas, C., Mens, K., and D'Hondt, T. 1996. Reuse contracts: Managing the evolution of reusable assets. In Proc. OOPSLA '96. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 31(10):268-286.
24. Westfechtel, B. 1991. Structure-oriented merging of revisions of software documents. In Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Software Configuration Management, ACM Press, pp. 68-79.