Controversial company: The prudent layperson standard and the patients' bill of rights

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 304-307

  Asplin, Brent R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMERGENCY TREATMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN RIGHTS; LAW; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033887222     PISSN: 01960644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0196-0644(00)70087-4     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Health Care Financing Administration The emergency medical and treatment act, as established under the consolidated omnibus budget reconciliation act (COBRA) of 1985 (42 USC 1395 dd) Federal Register. 59 1994 32086 32127
2. Lott T. S. 1344: Patients Bill of Rights Plus Act of 1999 . US Senate: 1999.
3. Kasich J. H.R. 2015: Balanced Budget Act of 1997 . US House of Representatives: 1997 .
4. Daschle TA. S. 6: Patients’ Bill of Rights Act of 1999 . US Senate: 1999.
5. Democratic Policy Committee Democratic leadership initiatives for the 106th Congress 1999 1 37 SR-02-Dem. Agenda
6. D. Parsons Letter to The Honorable Max Baucus June 1998 The United States Senate
7. S Rosenbaum DM Frankford B Moore Who should determine when health care is medically necessary? N Engl J Med 340 1999 229 232
8. M. Freudenheim Big HMO to give decisions on care back to doctors The New York Times. A November 9, 1999 1