On the repulsive nature of the dirichlet boundaries in the confined atom problem

Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 961-970

  Pupyshev, Vladimir I ^a  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC PHYSICS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; GROUND STATE; HYDROGEN; MOLECULES; NUMERICAL METHODS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ATOM MEDIUM INTERACTIONS; CONFINED ATOM PROBLEM; DIRICHLET BOUNDARIES; NUCLEOUS DISPLACEMENT; REPULSIVE NATURE;

ATOMS;

EID: 0033886588     PISSN: 09534075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/33/5/312     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Michels A, de Boer J and Bijl A 1937 Physica 4 981
2. Fouler P W 1984 Mol. Phys. 53 865
3. Jaskolski W 1996 Phys. Rep. 271 1
4. Hull T E and Julius R S 1956 Can. J. Phys. 34 914
5. Núñez M A and Izquerdo B G 1994 Int. J. Quant. Chem. Symp. 28 241
6. Levine J D 1965 Phys. Rev. 140 586
7. Arteca G, Fernandez F M and Castro E A 1984 J. Chem. Phys. 80 1569
8. Shan Y 1987 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 20 4275
9. Shan Y 1987 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 20 4285
10. Pupyshev V I and Scherbinin A V 1998 Chem. Phys. Lett. 295 217
11. Pupyshev V I, Scherbinin A V and Stepanov N F 1997 J. Math. Phys. 38 5626
12. Reed M and Simon B 1978 Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics vol 4 (New York: Academic) ch 13
13. Lyubic Yu I 1956 Mat. Sb. N. S. 39 23 (in Russian)
14. Zislin G M 1961 Usp. Mat. Nauk. 16 149
15. Hörmander L 1985 The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators vol 3 (New York: Springer)
16. Satpathy S 1983 Phys. Rev. B 28 4585
17. Hoffmann-Ostenhof T H 1980 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 13 417
18. Hoffmann-Ostenhof T H and Morgan J D III 1981 J. Chem. Phys. 75 843
19. Hogreve H 1993 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 26 159
20. Zhu J L and Chen X 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 4497
21. Pietzak B, Waiblinger M, Murphy T A, Weidinger A, Höhne M, Dietel E and Hirsh A 1997 Chem. Phys. Lett. 279 259