Cost-effective use of evaluation models: an empirical cross-national investigation

International Journal of Technology Management

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 368-383

  De Jong, W Martin ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION MAKING; EVALUATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

APPRAISAL METHODS; EVALUATION MODELS; TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE;

PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 0033885869     PISSN: 02675730     EISSN: None     Source Type: None    
DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2000.002821     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Sugden, R. and Williams, A. (1978) The Principles of Practical Cost-Benefit Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York.
2. Commissariat général du plan (Groupe présidé par Marcel Bôiteux) (1994) Transports: pour un meilleur choix des investissements, La documentation Francaise, Paris.
3. Majone, G. (1989) Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process, Yale University, CT.
4. Bruijn, J.A. de, Heuvelhof, E.F. ten and Jong, W.M. de (1994) Het infrastructuurfonds tussen inhoudelijke norm en politieke afweging. Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, the Hague, Netherlands.
5. Feldman, E.J. and Milch, J. (1982) Technocracy Versus Democracy: the Comparative Politics of International Airports, Auburn House Publishing Company, Boston, MA.
6. Fischer, F. and Forester, J. (eds.) (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, Duke University Press, Durham and London.
7. Martinand, C. (ed.) (1994) Private Financing of Public Infrastructure; The French Experience, Ministry of Public Works, Transportation and Tourism.
8. Page, E. and Goldsmith, M. (eds.) (1987) Central and Local Government Relations, Sage Publications, London.
9. Fourniau, J.-M. (1996) 'Making the decision more transparent; towards a more accountable management of major transport infrastructure projects in France', unpublished article.
10. Fourniau, J.-M. (1995) 'Evaluation et conduite des grands projets d'infrastructure de transport: des expériences de renouvellement encore hesitantes (version provisoire)', Paper presented at the international colloquium 'Grandes infrastructures de transport et territoires', Lille, France.
11. INRETS/GRRT (1995) Grandes infrastructures de transport et territoires; les procedures administratives et l'évaluation économique des projets d'investissements routiers: constat et perspective, Lille 8-9 juin 1995, France.
12. Bundesministerium für Verkehr, 1992. Gesamtwirtschaftliche Bewertung von Verkehrsweginvestitionen; Bewertungsverfahren für den Bundesverkehrswgeplan 1992, schriftenreihe, Heft 72, Bonn, Germany.
13. Bundesminister für Verkehr, 1992, Bundesverkehrswegeplan 1992, Beschluss der Bundesregierung vom 15. Juli 1992, Bonn, Germany.
14. de Jong, W.M. (1999) Institutional Transplantation; How to Adopt Good Transport Infrastructure Decision-Making Ideas From Other Countries?, Eburon Publishers, Delft, Netherlands.
15. Heller, I. (1992) 'Verslag bezoek Duitsland m.b.t. Integrale Prioriteitstelling Verkeer en Vervoer', Internal V&W report, 30 November.
16. Reh, W. (1988) Politikverflechtung im Fernstrassenbau der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und im Nationalstrassenbau der Schweiz, Beiträge zur Politikwissenschaft Band 37, Peter Land, Frankfurt am Main/Bern/New York/Paris.
17. Maggi, R. (1992) 'Swiss transport policy for Europe? federalism and the dominance of local issues', Transportation Review, Vol. 26A, No. 2, pp.193-198.
18. Schweizerische Bundesbahnen (1989) Bahn und Bus 2000, Von Konzept zur Planung, Sonderdruck Schweizer Eisenbahnrevue, Bern, Switzerland.
19. Beroggi G.E.G. (2000) 'Employing analytic tools in large scale engineering public policy making', International J. Technology Management, Vol. 19, Nos. 3/4/5, pp.336-356.
20. Moser, P, (1993) 'Why is the political system of Switzerland so stable?', Discussion paper No. 72, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland.
21. Sigg, O. (1983) Les institutions politiques en Suisse, Fondation Suisse de la culture Pro Helvetia, Zürich, Switzerland.
22. Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer (1991) Vierde Nota over de Ruimtelijke Ordening, The Hague, Netherlands.
23. Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat (1990) Tweede Structuurschema Verkeer en Vervoer, The Hague, Netherlands.
24. Jong, W.M. de, Stevens, H. and Veeneman, W.W. (1996) 'Evolving transport concepts, TRAIL Congress Proceedings, May, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.
25. Bruijn, J.A. de, Heuvelhof, E.F. ten and Veld, R.J. in 't (1998) Procesmanagement; over procesontwerp en besluitvorming, Academic Service, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
26. Mulder, M. (1993) Het systeem voor de prioriteitenstelling van Rijkswegen, een beleidsondersteunend hulpmiddel en de dagelijkse praktijk, bijdrage aan het symposium 'Beleidsanalyse en politieke besluitvorming op het terrein van verkeer en ruimtelijke ordening', Vrijdag 23 April 1993 in het Jaarbeurs congrescentrum te Utrecht, Netherlands.
27. Department of Transport (1989) Section 56 Grant for Public Transport, Circular 3 November 1989, including Annex A (Guidelines for public transport project appraisal) and accident reduction benefits: assessment of non-user component for rail scheme appraisals. London.
28. Nash, C. and Preston, J. (1991) 'Appraisal of rail investment projects: recent British experience', Transport Reviews, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp.295-309.
29. Department of the Environment/Department of Transport (1994) Planning Policy Guidance Transport (PPG13).
30. May, A.D. (1991) 'Integrated transport strategies: a new approach to urban transport policy formulation in the UK', Transport Reviews, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp.223-247.
31. Steer, G.M. (1995) 'Towards a regional transport policy: the South East's experience', Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport, August, pp.186-197.
32. Confederation of British Industry (1995) Missing links; Settling National Transport Priorities, A CBI Discussion Document, London.
33. Metropolitan Transportation Commission (1995) Multimodal Project Application for Surface Transportation Program Funds, Oakland, CA.
34. Chisholm, D. (1989) Coordination without Hierarchy; Informal Structures in Multiorganizational Systems, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
35. Younger, K.E. and Murray, D.G. (1994) Developing a Model of Multimodal Priority Setting for Transportation Projects in the San Francisco Bay Area in Response to the Opportunities in the ISTEA, Transportation Board, Washington, DC.