Preference factoring for stochastic trees

Management Science

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 389-403

  Hazen, Gordon ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DECISION THEORY; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PATIENT TREATMENT;

EXPECTED UTILITY; MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFETIME; STOCHASTIC TREES; TIME PREFERENCE;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 0033880370     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.46.3.389.12067     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Chang, R. W., J. M. Pellissier, G. B. Hazen. 1996. A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 275 858-865.
2. Cox, D. R. 1955. A use of complex probabilities in the theory of stochastic processes. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 51 313-319.
3. Gottlob, C. A., J. M. Pellissier, R. L. Wixson, S. H. Stern, S. D. Stulberg, R. W. Chang. 1996. The long-term cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Multipurpose Arthritis Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
4. Harris, W. H., C. B. Sledge. 1990. Total hip and total knee replacement. New England J. Medicine 323 725-731.
5. Hazen, G. B. 1992. Stochastic trees: A new technique for temporal medical decision modeling. Medical Decision Making 12 163-178.
6. _. 1993. Factored stochastic trees: A tool for solving complex temporal medical decision models. Medical Decision Making 13 227-236.
7. _, W. J. Hopp, J. M. Pellissier. 1991. Continuous-risk utility assessment Medical Decision Making 11 294-304.
8. _, M. Morrow, E. R. Venta. 1999. Patient values in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Society for Medical Decision Making Annual Meeting, Reno, NV.
9. _, J. M. Pellissier. 1996. Recursive utility for stochastic trees. Oper. Res. 44 788-809.
10. _, _, J. Sounderpandian. 1998. Stochastic tree models in medical decision making. Interfaces 48 64-80.
11. _, J. Sounderpandian. 1999. Preference summaries for stochastic trees rollback. Mark J. Machina, Bertrand Munier, eds. Beliefs, Interactions, and Preferences in Decision Making. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 109-120.
12. Keeney, R. L., H. Raiffa. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York.
13. Matchar, D. B., S. G. Pauker. 1986. Transient ischemic attacks in a man with coronary artery disease: Two strategies neck and neck. Medical Decision Making 6 239-249.
14. Meyer, R. F. 1976. Preferences over time. R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, eds. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York.
15. Pellissier, J. M., G. B. Hazen. 1994. Implementation of continuous-risk utility assessment: The total hip replacement decision. Socio-Econom. Planning Sci. 28 251-276.
16. _, _, R. W. Chang. 1996. A continuous-risk decision analysis of total hip replacement. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 47 776-793.
17. Tsevat J., M. H. Eckman, R. A. McNutt, S. G. Pauker. 1989. Warfarin for dilated cardiomyopathy: A bloody tough pill to swallow? Medical Decision Making 9 162-169.