Primitive spatial relations based on SKIZ

Image and Vision Computing

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 597-605

  Jan, S R ^a   Hsueh, Y C ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; IMAGE UNDERSTANDING;

SKELETON BY ZONES OF INFLUENCE (SKIZ);

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 0033879617     PISSN: 02628856     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0262-8856(99)00066-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Freeman J. The modeling of spatial relations. Computer Graphics and Image Processing. 4:1975;156-171.
2. Rosenfeld A., Kak A.C. Digital Picture Processing. 2 :1982;Academic Press, New York.
3. I. Bloch, Fuzzy relative position between objects in images: a morphological approach, Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing ICIP'96, 1996, pp. 987-990.
4. I. Bloch, Fuzzy spatial relationships: a few tools for model-based pattern recognition in aerial images, SPIE/EUROPTO Conference on Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing, vol. 2955, Taormina, Italy, 1996, pp. 141-152.
5. I. Bloch, Fuzzy relative position between objects in image processing: a morphological approach, Technique Report 97 D 003, Ecole Nationale Superieure des Telecommunications, Paris, 1997.
6. P. Gader, Fuzzy spatial relations based on fuzzy morphology, Proceedings of Sixth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ-IEEE'97, vol. 2, Barcelona, Spain, 1997, pp. 1179-1183.
7. Koczy L.T. On the description of relative position of fuzzy patterns. Pattern Recognition Letters. 8:1988;21-28.
8. Keller J.M., Sztandera L. Spatial relations among fuzzy subsets of an image. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis. 1990;207-211.
9. J.M. Keller, X. Wang, Comparison of spatial relation definitions in computer vision, Proceedings, ISUMA/NAFIPS'95, 1995, pp. 679-684.
10. Krishnapuram R., Keller J.M., Ma Yibing. Quantitative analysis of properties and spatial relations of fuzzy image regions. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 1:(3):1993;222-233.
11. J.M. Keller, X. Wang, Learning spatial relationships in computer vision, Proceedings of Fifth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ-IEEE'96, 1996, pp. 118-124.
12. K. Miyajima, A. Ralescu, Spatial Organization in 2D Images, Proceedings, Third IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Orlando, FL, 1994, pp. 100-105.
13. Miyajima K., Ralescu A., Asada M. Linguistic description of spatial relations between complex objects. Japanese Journal of Fuzzy Theory and Systems. 6:(5):1994;523-535.
14. Miyajima K., Ralescu A. Spatial organization in 2D segmented images: representation and recognition of primitive spatial relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 65:1994;225-236.
15. P. Matsakis, L. Wendling, J. Desachy, A New Way to Represent the Relative Position of 2D-Objects, Technique Report IRIT/97-31-R, IRIT-UPS, FRANCE, 1997.
16. X. Wang, J.M. Keller, P. Gader, Using Spatial Relationship as Features in Object Recognition, IEEE Annual Meeting of the North American. NAFIPS'97, 1997, pp. 160-165.
17. C. Lantuejoul, La squelettisation et son application aux measures topologiques des mosaiques polycristallines, these Dr Ing., Ecole des Mines de Paris, 1978.
18. Serra J. Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. 1982;Academic Press, London.
19. Vincent L., Soille P. Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 13:(6):1991;583-598.
20. Beucher S. Watersheds of functions and picture segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE, International conference on Acoustics, Speech, and signal processing, Paris. 1982;1928-1931.
21. Beucher S., Meyer F. The morphological approach to segmentation: the watershed transformation. Dougherty E.R. Mathematical Morphology in Image Processing. 1993;433-481 Marcel Dekker, New York.
22. Preteux F. On a distance function approach for gray_level mathematical morphology. Dougherty E.R. Mathematical Morphology in Image Processing. 1993;323-349 Marcel Dekker, New York.