Exact likelihood ratio test of independence of binary responses within clusters

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 15-23

  Kang, Seung Ho ^a   Park, Soo Min ^b  

^a Natl Ctr Toxicological Res J   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Correlated binary data; Exact test; Exchangeability; Longitudinal study; Ophthalmology; Otolaryngology

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CORRELATION METHODS; OPHTHALMOLOGY; VECTORS;

EXACT LIKELIHOOD RATIO TESTS; NULL HYPOTHESIS; OTOLARYNGOLOGY;

STATISTICAL METHODS;

EID: 0033875398     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00044-4     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Agresti A. A survey of exact inference for contingency tables. Statist. Sci. 7:1992;131-177.
2. Berger R.L., Boos D.D. P -values maximized over a confidence set for the nuisance parameter J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 89:1994;1012-1016.
3. Bowman D., George E.O. A saturated model for analyzing exchangeable binary data: applications to clinical and developmental toxicity studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90:1995;871-879.
4. George E.O., Kodell R.L. Tests of independence, treatment heterogeneity, and dose-related trend with exchangeable binary data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91:1996;1602-1611.
5. George E.O., Bowman D. A full likelihood procedure for analysing exchangeable binary data. Biometrics. 51:1995;512-523.
6. Hansen, K., Mahoney, J., Palta, M. 1999. Risk factors of lack of recovery of ADL independence after hospital discharge. J. Amer. Geriatrics Soc., to appear.
7. Hilton J., Mehta C.R. Power and sample size calculations for exact conditional tests with ordered categorical data. Biometrics. 49:1993;609-616.
8. Hirji K.F. A comparison of exact, mid-. P and score tests for matched case-control studies Biometrics. 47:1991;487-496.
9. Hirji K.F. Exact analysis for paired binary data. Biometrics. 50:1994;964-974.
10. Hirji K.F., Tan S., Elashoff R.M. A quasi-exact test for comparing two binomial parameters. Statist. Med. 10:1991;1137-1153.
11. Kim D., Agresti A. Improved exact inference about conditional association in three-way contingency tables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90:1995;632-639.
12. Lancaster H.O. Significance tests in discrete distribution. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 56:1961;223-234.
13. Mandel E., Bluestone C.D., Rockette H.E., Blatter M.M., Reisinger K.S., Wucher F.P., Harper J. Duration of effusion after antibiotic treatment for acute Otitis Media: comparison of Cefaclor and Amoxicillin. Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 1:1982;310-316.
14. Mehta C.R., Patel N.R., Senchaudhuri P. Exact power and sample-size computations for the Cochran-Armitage trend test. Biometrics. 54:1998;1615-1621.
15. Suissa S., Shuster J.J. Exact unconditional sample sizes for the. 2 × 2 binomial trial J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A. 148:1985;317-327.
16. Upton G.J.G. A comparison of alternative tests for the. 2 × 2 comparative trial J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A. 145:1982;86-105.