Design of a controlled-stiffness composite proximal femoral prosthesis

Composites Science and Technology

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 559-567

  Simoes J A ^a   Marques, A T ^b   Jeronimidis, G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

A. Fabric textiles; A. Hybrid composite; C. Stress transfer; Compression moulding; Hip prosthesis

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSION MOLDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EPOXY RESINS; FABRICS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GLASS FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; HIP PROSTHESES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRESS ANALYSIS;

BRAIDED HYBRID CARBON-GLASS PREFORMS; COMPOSITE PROXIMAL FEMORAL PROSTHESIS;

CARBON FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS;

EID: 0033874840     PISSN: 02663538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00155-4     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB. Early failures among 14009 cemented and 1326 uncemented prostheses for primary coarthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 1994;65:1-6.
2. Huiskes R. Failed innovation in total hip replacement: Diagnosis and proposals for a cure. Acta Orthop Scand 1993;64(6):699-716.
3. Morscher EW, Dick W. Cementless fixation of 'isoelastic' hip endoprostheses manufactured from plastic materials. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1983;176:77-87.
4. Butel J, Robb JE. The isoelastic hip prosthesis followed for 5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1988;59:258-62.
5. Nistor L, Blaha JD, Kjellstrom U, Selvik G. In vivo measurements of relative motion between an uncemented femoral total hip component and the femur by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Clin Orthop 1991;269:220-7.
6. Jacobsson SA, Djerf K, Gillquist J, Hammerby S, Iversson I. A prospective comparison of Butel and PCA hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1993;75B:624-9.
7. Andrew TA, Flanagan JP, Gerundini M, Bombelli R. The isoelastic non-cemented total hip arthroplasty: preliminary experience with 400 cases. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1986;206:127-38.
8. Trager D. The 5 to 7 year follow-up results with the RM isoelastic hip prosthesis. Unfallchirurg 1989;92:301-4.
9. Niinimäki T, Puranen J, Jalovaara P. Total hip arthroplasty using isoelastic femoral stems. A seven-to-nine year follow-up in 108 patients. J Bone Joint Surg 1994;76B(3):413-8.
10. Christel P, Meunier A, Leclerq S. Development of a carbon-carbon hip prosthesis. J Biomed Mater Res, Applied Biomaterials 1987;21(A2):191-218.
11. Linder L. Implant stability, histology, RSA and wear-more critical questions are needed: a viewpoint. Acta Orthop Scand 1994;65:654-8.
12. Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1986;208:103-8.
13. Simões JA, Taylor M, Marques AT, Jeronimidis G. Preliminary investigation of a novel controlled stiffness proximal prosthesis. Proc Inst Mech Engrs Part H 1998;212:165-75.
14. Kuiper JH, Huiskes R. Numerical optimization of hip-prosthetic stem material. In: Middleton et al., editors. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedicine, 1993. p. 76-84.
15. Simões JAO, António CAC, Marques AT. Material stiffness optimization for a composite hip prosthesis. In: S Adali, VE Verijienko, editors. 1st International Conference on Composite Science and Technology, Durban, South Africa, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Natal, 1996. p. 477-82.
16. Simões JA, Taylor M. Comparison of conventional and hybrid modulus pres-fit proximal femoral prostheses. In: M Cerrolaza, D Jugo, CA Brebbia, editors. Simulation modelling in bioengineering. Computational Mechanics Publications, 1996. p. 127-39.
17. Kuiper JH. Numerical optimization of artificial hip joint designs. Ph.D. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1993.
18. Huiskes R, Boeklagen R. Mathematical shape optimization of hip prosthesis design. J Biomech 1989;22:793-804.
19. Katoozian H, Davy DT. Three-dimensional shape optimization of femoral components of total hip prostheses. In: 1993 ASME Bioengineering Conference, BED, Vol. 24, 1993. p. 552-5.
20. Blake TA, Davy DT, Saravanos DA, Hopkins DA. Numerical optimization of composite hip endoprostheses. In: Proceedings of 4th AIAA/USAF/NASA/OAI symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, 1992. p. 119-29.
21. Yoon YS, Jang GH, Kim YY. Shape optimal design of the stem of a cemented hip prosthesis to minimize stress concentration in the cemented layer. J Biomech 1989;22(1/2):1279-84.
22. Davidson R, Brabon S, Lee RJ, Nelson K, Unwin P, Roughley P. The development of CFRP based hip stems. In: Proceedings of the 7th European conference on composite materials, ECCM-7, London, 1996. p. 513-17.
23. Widmer M, Callenbach T, Isler J, Fröhlich M, Meier D, Mayer J, et al. Injection moulding of carbon fibre reinforced PEEK for anisotropic hip-prostheses: Preliminary results. In: Proceedings of the III Portuguese Congress in Biomedical Engineering, Porto, 1995.
24. Devanathan D. Orthopaedic composites. In: Lee SM, editor. International encyclopedia of composites, Vol. 4. New York, 1991. p. 74-86.
25. Chang F, Perez JL, Davidson JA. Stiffness and strength tailoring of a hip prosthesis made of advanced composite materials. Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:873-99.
26. Scheer W. Carbon fibre reinforced epoxy resin, a material for human implants. In: Processing and uses of carbon fibre reinforced plastics. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag GmbH, Verlag des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure, 1981. p. 251-76.
27. Claes I, Burri C, Neugebauer R, Gruber U. Experimental investigations on hip prostheses with carbon fibre reinforced carbon shafts and ceramic heads. In: P. Vincenzini, editor. Ceramics in Surgery. Amsterdam, 1983. p. 243-50.
28. Hochman RF. US patent 3, 893, 196, 1975.
29. Turner RM, et al. US patent 4, 662, 887, 1987.
30. Fagan M, Aberman HM, Bushelow M, Lin RY, Dumbleton JH, DeYoung DJ, et alEffects of composite laminate lay-up configuration of a canine composite hip stem on bone strains. BED, Advances in Bioengineering, ASME 1994;28:445-6.
31. Magee FP, Weinstein AM, Longo JA, Koeneman JB, Yapp RA. A canine composite femoral stem. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1988;235:237-52.
32. Simoes JA, Vaz MA, Marques AT, Silva Gomes J. Development of a controlled stiffness composite femoral prosthesis. In: CR Gentle, JB Hull, editors. Mechanics in design '98, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 1998. p. 600-8.
33. Taylor M, Tanner KE, Freeman MAR, Yettram AL. Finite element modelling - a predictor of implant survival? J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1995;6:808-12.
34. Taylor M, Tanner KE, Freeman MAR, Yettram AL. Cancelous bone stresses surrounding the femoral component of a hip prosthesis: an elastic-plastic finite element analysis. Med Eng Phys 1995;17:544-50.
35. Taylor M, Tanner E. Fatigue failure of cancellous bone: a possible cause of implant migration and loosening. J Bone Joint Surg 1997;79B:181-2.
36. Huiskes R. Stress pattern around femoral stems. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1990;261:27-37.
37. Freeman MAR, Plante-Bordeneuve P. Early migration and late aseptic failure of proximal femoral prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1994;76B:432-8.
38. Kärrholm J, Borssen B, Löwenhielm G, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of the femoral stem prostheses matter. J Bone Joint Surg 1994;76B:912-7.
39. Walker PS, Mai SF, Cobb AG, Bentley G, Hua J. Prediction of clinical outcome of THR from migration measurements on standard radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg 1995;77B:705-14.
40. Linde F, Hvid I, Madsen F. The effect of specimen geometry on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech 1992;25:359-68.
41. Michel MC, Gou XE, Gibson LJ, McMahou TA, Hayes WC. Compressive fatigue behaviour of bovine trabecular bone. J Biomech 1994;26:453-63.
42. Simões JAO. Desenvolvimento da componente femoral de uma protese de anca de rigidez controlada. Translation: Development of controlled stiffness proximal femoral prosthesis. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Management, University of Porto, 1999.
43. Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L. Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 1993;64:497-506.