Technology and society: GSS-supported participatory policy analysis

International Journal of Technology Management

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 269-287

  Bongers, F J ^a,c,d,e   Geurts, J L A ^a   Smits, R E H M ^a,b,f  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Ctr Technol Plcy Studs N   (Netherlands)

^d Dutch Ministry of Home Affairs   (Netherlands)

^e IVA   (Netherlands)

^f Ctr for Technol and Policy Studies   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

PARTICIPATORY POLICY ANALYSIS; POLICY MAKING; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; TECHNOLOGY POLICY; TECHNOLOGY SCANS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 0033873141     PISSN: 02675730     EISSN: None     Source Type: None    
DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2000.002815     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. An earlier (and shorter) version of this paper entitled 'GSS-supported technology scans at the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs' has been presented at the 7th mini-conference of EURO: the Association of European Operational Research Societies (Bruges, March 1997). It has been submitted for publication to the Journal of Decision Systems.
2. An earlier (and shorter) version of this paper entitled 'GSS-supported technology scans at the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs' has been presented at the 7th mini-conference of EURO: the Association of European Operational Research Societies (Bruges, March 1997). It has been submitted for publication to the Journal of Decision Systems.
3. Ministry of Economic Affairs (1995) Knowledge in Action (Kennis in Beweging), The Hague.
4. Gallupe, R.B. and Cooper, W.H. (1993) 'Brainstorming electronically', Sloan Management Review, Autumn, pp.27-37.
5. Nunamaker, J.F., Briggs, R.O. and Mittleman, D.M. (1995) 'Electronic meeting systems: ten years of lessons learned', in: Coleman, D., and R. Khanna (Eds.) Groupware: Technology and Applications, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
6. Petrovic, O. and Krickl, O. (1994) 'Traditionally-moderated versus computer supported brainstorming: a comparative study', Information & Management, Vol. 27, pp.233-243.
7. Pinsonneault, A. and Kraemer, K.L. (1990) 'The effect of electronic meetings on group processes and outcomes: an assessment of the empirical research', European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 46, pp.143-161.
8. Pinsonneault, A. and Kraemer, K.L. (1989) 'The impact of technological support on groups: an assessment of the empirical research', Decision Support Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 197-216.
9. Sheffield, J. and Gallupe, R.B. (1995) 'Using group support systems to improve the New Zealand economy Part II: follow-up results', Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 11, pp. 135-53.
10. Sheffield, J. and Gallupe, R.B. (1994) 'Using electronic meeting technology to support economic policy development in New Zealand', Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 10, pp.97-116.
11. Bongers, F.J. (1996) Changes in Policy Processes: GSSs as Instruments in Participatory Policy Analysis, Ph.D. Research Proposal, Tilburg University, Tilburg.
12. Geurts, J.L.A. and Mayer, I.S. (1996) Methods for Participatory Policy Analysis: Towards a Conceptual Model for Research and Development, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre (WORC) Report 96.12.008/3, Tilburg.
13. Dunn, W.D. (1994) Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
14. DeLeon, P. (1990) 'Participatory policy analysis: prescription and precautions', Asian Journal of Public Administration, pp.29-54.
15. Frissen, P.H.A. (1991) De Versplinterde Staat: Over Informatisering, Bureaucratie en Technocratie voorbij de Politiek, Samson H.D. Tjeenk Willink, Alphen a/d Rijn.
16. Durning D. (1993) 'Participatory policy analysis in a social service agency: a case study', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 12, pp.297-322.
17. Geurts J.L.A. and Vennix, J.A.M. (Eds.) (1989) Verkenningen in Beleidsanalyse: Theorie en Praktijk van Modelbouw en Simulatie, Kerkebosch, Zeist.
18. Vennix J.A.M. (1996) Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
19. Verburgh L. (1994) Participatory Policy Modelling Applied to the Health Insurance Industry, Linschoten.
20. DeSanctis, G. and Gallupe, R.B. (1987) 'A foundation for the study of group decision support systems, Management Science, Vol. 33, pp.589-609.
21. Huber, G.P. (1984) 'Issues in the design of group decision support systems', MIS Quarterly, pp. 195-205.
22. Noori, H. (1995) 'The design of an integrated group decision support systems for technology assessment', R&D Management, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.309-22.
23. Actually, DeSanctis and Gallupe describe the term Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS). We consider GDSS and GSS as synonyms, but we prefer GSS above GDSS. GSS can be used for many purposes and not only for decision-related tasks.
24. Mayer I.S. (1997) Debating Technologies: A Methodological Contribution to the Design and Evaluation of Participatory Policy Analysis, Tilburg University Press, Tilburg.
25. The other six modes are: (1) Education/information; (2) anticipation; (3) mediation; (4) coordination; (5) cooperation/co-production and (6) transformation/learning [23].
26. Cohen, M.D., March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1972) 'A garbage can model of organizational choice', Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.17, pp.1-25.
27. Hickson, D.J. c.s. (1986) Top Decisions: Strategic Decision-Making in Organizations, Blackwell, Oxford.
28. Adelman, L. (1991) 'Experiments, quasi-experiments and case-studies: a review of empirical methods for evaluating decision support systems', IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp.293-301.
29. Dennis, A.R., Nunamaker, J.F. and Vogel, R.D. (1991) 'A comparison of laboratory and field research in the study of electronic meeting systems', Journal of Management Information Systems, pp.107-135.
30. The number of respondents in the divergence questionnaire was 39 (= 95%) and in the convergence questionnaire 9 (= 100%). The questionnaires contained five point scale propositions (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). A factor analysis and a reliability test were not carried out because of this low number of respondents.
31. th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Cork, Ireland, Vol. III, pp.1266-1285.
32. Joldersma F. (1997) 'Participatory policy-making: balancing between divergence and convergence', European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp.207-218.
33. Schwarz, R.M. (1994) The Skilled Facilitator: Practical Wisdom for Developing Effective Groups, Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco.
34. The response to the survey was 17 (38%). The survey included yes/no- questions and propositions with a five point disagree/agree scale. The yes/no questions read as follows: 'Does the report fulfil your expectations?'; 'Do you recognize your own contribution?'; 'Do you recognize your group's contribution?'; 'Do you expect that the report will be an important input in the steering committee's decision-making with regard to the technology scans?'; 'Do you feel more involved in the technology scans?'; 'Would the application of traditional instruments have resulted in more policy relevant information?'; 'Does GSS improve the link between information supply and demand in policy-making compared with traditional instruments?'; and 'Does a GSS improve the quality of the report?'. The propositions were about the usefulness, scope, depth and quantity of the problem areas, (elaboration of) technology-based project ideas and selection criteria (see Table 9).
35. Dunn, W.N. (1980) 'The two-communities metaphor and models of knowledge use: an exploratory case survey', Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.513-36.
36. Weiss, C.H. (1980) 'Knowledge creep and decision accretion', Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, Vol. 1, pp.381-404.
37. We are also involved in the evaluation of this project. An evaluation of this debat is made with regard to three aspects: (1) An assessment of websites as a participatory instrument; (2) a comparison of these debates with other Internet debates; and (3) a comparison with other ICT-based participatory instruments. The project also includes a 'same time/different place' Internet discussion using GroupSystems.
38. Smits, R.E.H.M. (1994) Elk Land krijgt de Technologie die het verdient, maar lang niet altijd die Technologie welke het nodig heeft, Tilburg, Tilburg University Press.
39. Smits, R.E.H.M. and Leyten, J. (1991) Technology Assessment: Waakhond of Speurhond? Naar een Integraal Technologiebeleid, Kerkebosch, Zeist.
40. Hertog, P. den (1996) A Demand Oriented Foresight Exercise for the Dutch Technology and Society Program, ASTPP Workshop on Technology Assessment, Amsterdam.