Performance investigation of hamming distance bit vertical counter applied to access methods in information retrieval

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 427-431

  El Qawasmeh, Eyas ^a   Hmeidi, Ismail ^a  

^a JORDAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Jordan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ASSOCIATIVE STORAGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COUNTING CIRCUITS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FILE ORGANIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PATTERN MATCHING; VECTORS;

ASSOCIATIVE ACCESS METHODS; HAMMING DISTANCE BIT VERTICAL COUNTER;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 0033872534     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:5<427::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-X     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Berkovich, S., El-Qawasmeh, E., Lapir, G., Mack, M., & Zincke, C. (1998). Organization of near matching in bit attribute matrix applied to associative access methods in information retrieval. Proceeding of the 16th IASTED International Conference Applied Informatics (pp. 62-64). Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
2. Croft, W. & Savino, P. (1988). Implementing ranking strategies using text signatures. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 6, 42-62.
3. El-Qawasmeh, E. (1998). Development and investigation of a Hash transformation technique tolerating bit-position mismatches. Ph.D. Dissertation submitted to George Washington University, Washington, DC.
4. Frakes, W. & Baeza-Yates, R. (I993). Information retrieval: Data structures & algorithms. Saddle Ridge, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.
5. Keen, E. (1992). Presenting results of experimental retrieval comparisons. Information Processing and Management, 28, 491-502.
6. Lapir, G. (1992). Use of associative access method for information retrieval systems. Proceeding of the 23rd Annual Pittsburgh Conference on Modeling and Simulation (pp. 951-958), Pittsburgh, PA.
7. Lee, D.L., Kim, Y.M., & Patel, G. (1995, June). Efficient signature file methods for text retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 7, 423-435.
8. Shaw, W., Burgin, R., & Howell, P. (1997). Performance standards and evaluations in IR test collections: Cluster-based retrieval models. Information Processing and Management, 33, 1-14.
9. Turtle, H. & Croft, W.B. (1992). A comparison of text retrieval models. Computer Journal, 35, 279-290.
10. Yang, K. (1997). Combining multiple document representations and multiple relevance feedback methods to improve retrieval performance. Master thesis submitted to University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.