Ethical responsibilities of editors, reviewers, and authors

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 378, Issue , 2000, Pages 83-89

  Cowell, Henry R ^a,b   Bunch, Wilton H ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CONFERENCE PAPER; ETHICS; FORGERY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; ORTHOPEDICS; PATIENT RIGHT; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RESPONSIBILITY; SCIENCE;

EID: 0033866788     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200009000-00014     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. The Ingelfinger rule revisited
2. Correspondence: Human experimentation
3. Harvard delays in reporting fraud
4. Responsibilities of authors
5. Multiple authorship of manuscripts
6. Informed consent
7. Blinded peer review
8. Human experimentation
9. Ethics of medical authorship
10. The millenium enigma: More is less
11. Misrepresentation of research criteria by orthopaedic residency applicants
12. The misconduct of redundant publication
13. Human experimentation
14. Coping with fraud
15. COPE moves forward
16. Guidelines on Good Publication Practice
17. Current concepts review: The conduct of orthopaedic clinical trials
18. The ethical basis of science
19. Sounding board: Malpractice prevention through the sharing of uncertainty: Informed consent and the therapeutic alliance
20. Editors and the problem of authorship: Rulemakers or gatekeepers
21. Instructions to authors
22. Pressure to publish: Tenure and promotion considerations
23. Lessons from the Darsee affair
24. The Editor: Mark, Dupe, Patsy, Accessory, Weasel, and Flatfoot
25. Ethical standards in the treatment of human subjects involved in clinical research