Epidemiology and the World Wide Web: Is there a 'net benefit?

Epidemiologic Reviews

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 181-185

  Florey, Charles Du V ^a,b   Ben Shlomo, Yoav ^b   Egger, Matthias ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MICROCOMPUTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033865865     PISSN: 0193936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a018019     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Use of the Internet for infection control and epidemiology
2. European Influenza Surveillance Scheme on the Internet
3. Le reseau sentinelles: Douze annees de recherches et de surveillance sur les maladies transmissibles en France
4. FluNet as a tool for global monitoring of influenza on the Web
5. Impact of a Web-based clinical information system on cisapride drug interactions and patient safety
6. Epidemiology and public health journals on the Internet
7. Data collection in multicenter clinical trials via Internet: A generic system in Java
8. A web-based data collection system for clinical studies using Java
9. Internet for clinical trials: Past, present and future
10. Epidemiology and the Internet. (Editorial)
11. Telephone sampling in epidemiologic research: To reap the benefits, avoid the pitfalls
12. Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals
13. The death of biomedical journals
14. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: Current issues and future directions
15. A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer
16. How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing
17. Structural transformations of the sciences and the end of peer review
18. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement
19. Pardonable revisions and protocol reviews
20. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
21. The NIH 'E-Biomed' proposal: A potential threat to the evaluation and orderly dissemination of new clinical studies
22. NIH E-Biomed proposal: A welcome jolt. (Editorial)
23. Peer review on the Internet
24. Lancet electronic research archive in international health and eprint server
25. The joy of being electronic: The BMJ's website is mushrooming. (Editorial)
26. Publication bias and dissemination of clinical research
27. Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials
28. Publication bias in clinical research
29. Factors influencing publication of research results: Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards
30. Publication bias: Evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects
31. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct
32. Publication: An ethical imperative
33. Publication bias: The case for an international registry of clinical trials
34. Register of randomised controlled trials in pefinatal medicine. (Letter)
35. Time to register randomised trials
36. Time to register randomised trials: The case is now unanswerable. (Editorial)
37. The Global Health Network supercourse: Epidemiology, the Intemet, and global health