Acts and omissions revisited

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 227-228

  Hope, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POTASSIUM CHLORIDE;

CAUSE OF DEATH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DROWNING; DYING; EDITORIAL; EUTHANASIA; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HOMICIDE; HUMAN; INTOXICATION; JOB PERFORMANCE; LEGAL ASPECT; LIFESPAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; PHILOSOPHY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; THINKING;

DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; KILLING; MORAL POLICY;

ETHICS, MEDICAL; EUTHANASIA; EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE; HUMANS; MORALS; MOTIVATION; TERMINAL CARE; VALUE OF LIFE; WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;

EID: 0033862260     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.26.4.227     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Are medical ethicists out of touch? Practitioner attitudes in the US and UK towards decisions at the end of life
2. Causal authorship and the equality principle: A defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia
3. Active and passive euthanasia