Guidelines and recommendations for antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing against veterinary mycoplasma species

Veterinary Research

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 373-395

  Hannan, Peter C T ^a  

^a Mycoplasma Experience Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; MYCOPLASMA; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STANDARDIZATION; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

MOLLICUTES; MYCOPLASMA; MYCOPLASMA BOVIS; MYCOPLASMA GALLISEPTICUM; MYCOPLASMA HYOPNEUMONIAE; MYCOPLASMA SYNOVIAE; MYCOPLASMATALES; UREAPLASMA;

EID: 0033861329     PISSN: 09284249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2000100     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Ball H.J., Craig-Reilly G.A., Bryson D.G., Antibiotic susceptibility of Mycoplasma bovis strains isolated in Northern Ireland, Irish Veterinary Journal 48 (1995) 316-318.
2. Bébéar C., Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing, Introductory Remarks, in: Tully J.G., Razin S. (Eds.), Molecular and Diagnostic Procedures in Mycoplasmology, Vol. II, Diagnostic Procedures, Academic Press, London, 1996, pp. 181-183.
3. Bébéar C., Robertson J.A., Determination of Minimal Inhibitory Concentration, in: Tully J.G., Razin S. (Eds.), Molecular and Diagnostic procedures in Mycoplasmology, Vol. II, Diagnostic Procedures, Academic Press, London, 1996, pp. 189-197.
4. Bradbury J.M., Yavari C.A., Giles C.J., In vitro evaluation of various antimicrobials against Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae by the micro-broth method and comparison with a commerically-prepared test system, Avian Pathol. 23 (1994) 105-115.
5. Cooper A.C., Fuller J.R., Fuller M.K., Whittlestone P., Wise D.R., In vitro activity of danofloxacin, tylosin and oxytetracycline against mycoplasmas of veterinary importance, Res. Vet. Sci. 54 (1993) 329-334.
6. Devriese L.A., Haesebrouck F., Antibiotic susceptibility testing of Mycoplasma bovis using Tween 80 hydrolysis as an indicator of growth. Zentralbl. Veterinaermed. B 38 (1991) 781-783.
7. Edward D.G. ff., A selective medium for pleuropneumonia-like organisms, J. Gen. Microbiol. 1 (1947) 238-243.
8. Ericsson H.M., Sherris J.C., Antibiotic sensitivity testing, Report of an international collaborative study, Acta. Pathol. Microbiol. Scand, Suppl. Section B 217 (1971) 1-90.
9. Freundt E.A., Culture media for classic Mycoplasmas, in: Razin S., Tully J.G. (Eds.), Methods in Mycoplasmology, Vol. 1, Mycoplasma Characterization, Academic Press, London, 1983, pp. 127-135.
10. Friis N.F., Szancer J., Sensitivity of certain porcine and bovine mycoplasmas to antimicrobial agents in a liquid medium test compared to a disc assay, Acta. Vet. Scand. 35 (1994) 389-394.
11. Garrod L.P., O'Grady F., Macrolides, in: Antibiotic and Chemotherapy, 3rd Ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh and London, 1972, pp. 166-181.
12. Hamdy A.M., Blanchard C.J., In-vitro activity of lincomycin and spectinomycin against serotypes of avian mycoplasma, Appl. Microbiol. 20 (1970) 26-30.
13. Hannan P.C.T., Sodium aurothiomalate, gold keratinate and various tetracyclines in mycoplasma-induced arthritis in rodents, J. Med. Microbiol. 10 (1977) 87-102.
14. Hannan P.C.T., Antibiotic susceptibility of Mycoplasma fermentans strains from various sources and the development of resistance to aminoglycosides in vitro, J. Med. Microbiol. 42 (1995) 421-428.
15. Hannan P.C.T., O'Hanlon P.J., Rogers N.H., In vitro evaluation of various quinolone antibacterial agents against veterinary mycoplasmas and porcine respiratory bacterial pathogens, Res. Vet. Sci. 46 (1989) 202-211.
16. Hannan P.C.T., Windsor G.D., de Jong A., Schmeer N., Stegemann M., Comparative susceptibilities of various animal-pathogenic mycoplasmas to fluoroquinolones, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41 (1997) 2037-2040.
17. Hannan P.C.T., Windsor H.M., Ripley P.H., In vitro susceptibilities of recent field isolates of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Mycoplasma hyosynoviae to valnemulin (Econor), tiamulin and enrofloxacin and the in vitro development of resistance to certain antimicrobial agents in Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Res. Vet. Sci. 63 (1997) 157-160.
18. Howard C.J., Gourlay R.N., Collins J., Serological studies with bovine ureaplasmas (T-mycoplasmas), Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 28 (1978) 473-477.
19. Inamoto T., Takahashi H., Yamamoto K., Nakai Y., Ogimoto K., Antibiotic susceptibility of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae isolated from swine, J. Vet. Med. Sci. 56 (1994) 393-394.
20. Jordan F.T.W., Knight D.L., The minimal inhibitory concentration of kitasamycin, tylosin and tiamulin for Mycoplasma gallisepticum and their protective effect on infected chicks, Avian Pathol. 13 (1984) 151-162.
21. Jordan F.T.W., Gilbert S., Knight D.L., Yavari C.A., Effects of Baytril, Tylosin and Tiamulin on avian mycoplasmas, Avian Pathol. 18 (1989) 659-673.
22. Kempf I., Ollivier C., L'Hospitalier R., Guittet M., Bennejean G., Concentrations minimales inhibitrices de 13 antibiotiques vis-à-vis de 21 souches de mycoplasmes de volailles, Le Point Vétérinaire 20 (1989) 935-940.
23. Kenny G.E., Problems and opportunities in Susceptibility Testing of Mollicutes, in: Tully J.G., Razin S. (Eds.), Molecular and Diagnostic procedures in Mycoplasmology, Vol. II, Diagnostic Procedures, Academic Press, London, 1996, pp. 185-188.
24. Kenny G.E., Cartwright F.D., Susceptibilities of Mycoplasma hominis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Ureaplasma urealyticum to new glycyclines in comparison with those to older tetracyclines, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38 (1994) 2628-2632.
25. Kleven S.H., Andersen D.P., In vitro activity of various antibiotics against Mycoplasma synoviae, Avian Dis. 15 (1971) 551-557.
26. Kobayashi H., Morozumi T., Munthali G., Mitani K., Ito N., Yamamoto K., Macrolide susceptibility of Mycoplasma hyorhinis isolated from piglets, Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 40 (1996) 1030-1032.
27. Koh H-B, Kim G-N, Lee J-G., Minimum inhibitory concentrations of tiamulin and oxytetracycline in combination in field isolates of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Proc. Int. Pig. Vet. Soc. 13th IPVS Congress, Bangkok, Thailand, June 26-30, 1994, p. 353.
28. Levisohn S., Antibiotic sensitivity patterns in field isolates of Mycoplasma gallisepticum as a guide to chemotherapy, Isr. J. Med. Sci. 17 (1981) 661-666.
29. Levisohn S., Berman E., Weisman Y., Effect of treatment of turkeys under field conditions with tylosin or enrofloxacin on frequency of isolation and sensitivity patterns of Mycoplasma meleagridis, Public Health Rev. 20 (1993) 183.
30. Levisohn S., Gerchman I., Weisman Y., Antibiotic resistance in Mycoplasma iowae: Selective pressure by field treatment, IOM Letters Vol. 4. 11th International Congress of the International Organisation for Mycoplasmology (IOM), Orlando, Florida, USA, July 14-19, 1996, p. 404-405.
31. Phillips I., Andrews J.M., Bridson E., Cooke E.M., Holt H.A., Spencer R.C., Wise R., Bint A.J., Brown D.F.J., Greenwood D., King A., Williams R.J., A guide to sensitivity testing, Report of the working party on Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. Suppl. D 27 (1991) 1-50.
32. Poumarat F., Martel J.L., Antibiosensibilité in vitro des souches françaises de Mycoplasma bovis, Ann. Rech. Vét. 20 (1979) 145-152.
33. Roberts M.C., Antibiotic resistance, in: Maniloff J., McElhaney R.N., Finch L.R., Baseman J.B. (Eds.), Mycoplasmas: Molecular Biology and Pathogenesis, American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C., 1992, pp. 513-523.
34. Robertson J.A., Stemke G.W., Measurement of Mollicute Growth by ATP-Dependent Luminometry, in: Razin S., Tully J.G (Eds.), Molecular and Diagnostic Procedures in Mycoplasmology, Vol I., Molecular Characterization, Academic Press, London, 1995, pp. 65-71.
35. Robertson J.A., Coppola J.E., Heisler O.R., Standardized Method for Determining Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Strains of Ureaplasma urealyticum and their response to Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Rosaramicin, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 20 (1981) 53-58.
36. Shepard M.C., Culture media for Ureaplasmas, in: Razin S., Tully J.G. (Eds.), Methods in Mycoplasmology, Vol. 1, Mycoplasma Characterization, Academic Press, London, 1983. pp. 137-146.
37. Stipkovits L., Varga Z., Laber G., Böchmann J., A comparison of the effect of tiamulin hydrogen fumarate and tylosin tartrate on mycoplasmas of ruminants and some animal ureaplasmas, Vet. Microbiol. 9 (1984) 147-153.
38. Takahashi I., Yoshida T., Antimycoplasma activities of ofloxacin and commonly used antimicrobial agents on Mycoplasma gallisepticum, Jap. J. Antibiot. 42 (1989) 1166-1172.
39. Tanner A.C., Wu C.C., Adaptation of the Sensititre broth microdilution technique to antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Mycoplasma gallisepticum, Avian Dis. 36 (1992) 714-717.
40. Taylor-Robinson D., Cidal activity testing, in: Tully J.G., Razin S. (Eds.), Molecular and Diagnostic Procedures in Mycoplasmology, Vol. II, Diagnostic Procedures, Academic Press, London, 1996, pp. 199-204.
41. Taylor-Robinson D., Martin-Bourgon C., Watanabe T., Addey J.P., Isolation of T-mycoplasmas from dogs and squirrel monkeys: Biological and Serological comparison with those isolated from man and cattle, J. Gen. Microbiol. 68 (1971) 97-107.
42. Ter Laak E.A., Pijpers A., Noordergraaf J.H., Schoevers E.G., Verheijden J.H.M., Comparison of methods for in vitro testing of susceptibility of porcine mycoplasma species to antimicrobial agents, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35 (1991) 228-233.
43. Ter Laak E.A., Noordergraaf J.H., Verschure M.H., Susceptibilities of Mycoplasma bovis, Mycoplasma dispar and Ureaplasma diversum strains to antimicrobial agents in vitro, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37 (1993) 317-321.
44. Wachowski Ch., Kirchhoff H., Studies of sensitivity of Mycoplasma bovis field strains to various antibiotics and chemotherapeutics, Berl. Muench. Tieraerztl. Wochenschr. 99 (1986) 41-44 (in German).
45. Waites K.B., Figarola T.A., Schmid T., Crabb D.M., Duffy L.B., Simecka J.W., Comparison of agar versus broth dilution techniques for determining antibiotic susceptibilities of Urealasma urealyticum, Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 14 (1991) 265-271.
46. Watts J.L., Chengappa M.M., Cole J.R., Cooper J.M., Inzana T.J., Plaunt M.R., Shyrock T.R., Thornsberry C., Walker R.D., Wu C.C., Development of in vitro susceptibility testing criteria and quality control parameters for veterinary antimicrobial agents; Approved guideline, NCCLS document M37-A [ISBN 1-56238-369-8], Vol. 19. No. 3, 1999.
47. Whithear K.G., Bowtell D.D., Ghiocas E., Hughes K.L., Evaluation and use of a Micro-Broth Dilution Procedure for testing sensitivity of fermentative avian mycoplasmas to antibiotics, Avian Dis. 27 (1983) 937-949.
48. Williams P.P., In vitro susceptibility of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Mycoplasma hyorhinix to fifty-one antimicrobial agents, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 14 (1978) 210-213.
49. Windsor G.D., Edward D.G. ff., Trigwell J.A., A solid medium for culture and identification of human T-mycoplasmas., J. Med. Microbiol. 8 (1975) 183-187.
50. Yamamoto K., Koshimizu K., In vitro susceptibility of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae to antibiotics, Proc. Int. Vet. Soc. 8th IPVS Congress, Ghent, Belgium, Aug. 27-31, 1984, p. 116.
51. Zimmerman B.J., Ross R.F., Determination of sensitivity of Mycoplasma hyosynoviae to tylosin and selected antibacterial drugs by a microtitre technique, Can. J. Comp. Med. 39 (1975) 17-21.