Morphometric variation among populations of Ambrysus mormon montandon (Heteroptera: Naucoridae)

Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 533-541

  Sites, Robert W ^a   Willig, Michael R ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CENTER FOR ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambrysus mormon; Morphometrics; Naucoridae; Phenetics; Shape

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033860504     PISSN: 00138797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Carpenter, E. 1915. Ground water in southeastern Nevada. United States Geological Survey, Water-Supply Paper 333: 1-90, figs. 1-9, pls. 1-2.
2. Fortin, M.-J. and J. Gurevitch. 1993. Spatial statistics: Analysis of field experiments, pp. 319-341. In Scheiner, S. M. and G. Gurevitch, eds., Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York. 445 pp.
3. Gilbert, C. H. 1893. Report on the fishes of the Death Valley Expedition collected in southern California and Nevada in 1891, with descriptions of new species. North American Fauna 7: 229-234, pls. 5-6.
4. Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6: 65-70.
5. Hubbs, C. L. and R. R. Miller. 1948. The Great Basin, with emphasis on glacial and postglacial times. II. The zoological evidence: Correlation between fish distribution and hydrographic history in the desert basins of western United States. Bulletin of the University of Utah 38(20): 18-166 + 1 map.
6. King, P. B. 1958. Evolution of modern surface features of western North America, pp. 3-60. In Hubbs, C. L., ed. Zoogeography. American Association for the Advancement of Science Publication Number 51, 509 pp.
7. La Rivers, I. 1951. A revision of the genus Ambrysus in the United States (Hemiptera: Naucoridae). University of California Publications in Entomology 8: 277-338.
8. _. 1963. Two new Ambrysi (Hemiptera: Naucoridae). Biological Society of Nevada Occasional Papers 1: 1-7.
9. _. 1971. Studies of Naucoridae (Hemiptera). Biological Society of Nevada Memoirs 2, iii + 120 pp.
10. Manly, B. F. J. 1994. Multivariate statistical methods: A primer, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, New York. 159 pp.
11. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
12. Sites, R. W. and M. R. Willig. 1994a. Interspecific affinities in Ambrysus (Hemiptera: Naucoridae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 96: 527-532.
13. _. 1994b. Efficacy of mensural characters in discriminating among species of Naucoridae (Insecta: Hemiptera): Multivariate approaches with an ontogenetic perspective. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87(6): 803-814.
14. Sites, R. W., M. R. Willig, and R. S. Zack. 1996. Morphology, ontogeny, and adaptation of Ambrysus mormon (Hemiptera: Naucoridae): Quantitative comparisons among populations in different thermal environments. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89: 12-19.
15. Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman, New York. 887 pp.
16. SPSS, Inc. 1990. The SPSS Base System User's Guide. SPSS, Inc., Chicago. 520 pp.
17. Usinger, R. L. 1946. Notes and descriptions of Ambrysus Stal with an account of the life history of Ambrysus mormon Montd. (Hemiptera, Naucoridae). University of Kansas Science Bulletin 31: 185-210.