Measuring disabilities in stroke patients with apraxia: A validation study of an observational method

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 401-414

  Van Heugten, Caroline M ^a   Dekker, Joost ^b   Deelman, Betto G ^b   Van Dijk, Alfons J ^b   Stehmann Saris, Fieneke C ^b   Kinebanian, Astrid ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR REHABILITATION RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APRAXIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NURSING HOME; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REHABILITATION CENTER; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0033860260     PISSN: 09602011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/096020100411989     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arnadottir, G. (1990). The brain and behaviour. St. Louis: Mosby.
2. Bentler, P.M., & Bonnet, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
3. Brandstater, M.E. (1990). An overview of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 213 (suppl. II), 40-42.
4. Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Collin, C., Wade, D.T., Davies, S., & Horne, V. (1988). The Barthel-index: A reliability study. International Disability Studies, 10(2), 61-63.
6. De Renzi, E. (1989). Apraxia. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology, Vol 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. Geschwind, N. (1975). The apraxias: Neural mechanisms of disorders of learned movement. American Scientist, 63, 188-195.
8. Joreskog K.G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL-8 structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.
9. Kolb, B. & Whishaw, I.Q. (1990). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (3rd edn.). New York: Freeman.
10. Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. MacCallum, R.C., & Browne, M.W. (1993). The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models. Some practical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 533-541.
12. Tanaka, J.S. (1987). How big is big enough? Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables. Child Development, 58, 135-146.
13. van Crevel, H. (1991). Consensus cerebrovascular accident. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 135(48), 2280-2288.
14. van Heugten, C.M., Dekker, J., Deelman, B.G., Stehmann-Saris, J.C., & Kinebanian, A. (1999a). Assessment of disabilities in stroke patients with apraxia: Internal consistency and inter-observer reliability. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 19(1), 55-73.
15. van Heugten, C.M., Dekker, J., Deelman, B.G., Stehmann-Saris, J.C., & Kinebanian, A. (1999b). A diagnostic test for apraxia in stroke patients: Internal consistency and diagnostic value. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(2), 182-192.
16. Wade, D.T. (1992). Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Wade, D.T., & Collin, C. (1988). The Barthel-index: A standard measure of physical disability? International Disability Studies, 10(2), 64-67.
18. World Health Organization (1980). International Classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: WHO.