Daphnia populations in three interconnected lakes with roach as the principal planktivore

Journal of Plankton Research

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 1539-1557

  Gliwicz, Z Maciej ^a   Rutkowska, Anna Ewa ^a   Wojciechowska, Joanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FERTILITY; FOOD AVAILABILITY; HABITAT; LAKE; POLAND; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION; SEASONALITY;

CARRYING CAPACITY; FOOD AVAILABILITY; LAKE ECOSYSTEM; POPULATION DENSITY; ZOOPLANKTON;

POLAND;

CLADOCERA; DAPHNIA; DAPHNIA CUCULLATA; DAPHNIA HYALINA; RUTILUS RUTILUS;

EID: 0033859858     PISSN: 01427873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/22.8.1539     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andrewartha, H.G. and Birch, L.C. (1954) The Distribution and Abundance of Animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
2. Eggers, D.M. (1982) Planktivore preference by prey size. Ecology, 63, 381-390.
3. Giske, J., Huse, G. and Fiksen, Ø. (1998) Modelling spatial dynamics of fish. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 8, 57-91.
4. Gliwicz, Z.M. (1992) Can ecological theory be used to improve water quality? Hydrobiologia, 243/244, 283-291.
5. Gliwicz, Z.M. (in press) Species-specific population-density thresholds in cladocerans? Hydrobiologia.
6. Gliwicz, Z.M. and Dawidowicz, P. (in press) Roach feeding behavior modified by alarm substance. 1. Field experience. Arch. Hydrobiol., 120.
7. Gliwicz, Z.M. and Jachner, A. (1992) Diel migrations of juvenile fish: a ghost of predation past or present? Arch. Hydrobiol., 124, 385-430.
8. Gliwicz, Z.M. and Pijanowska, J. (1989) The role of predation in zooplankton succession. In Sommer, U. (ed.), Plankton Ecology: Succession in Plankton Communities. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 253-296.
9. Gliwicz, Z.M., Lampert, W., Korinek, V. and Boavida, MJ.L. (1998) Controlling the bahavior of planktivorous fish with counterfeit information on risk to predation. Final Report, EU Project No CIPA-CT 93-0118, 80 pp.
10. Gliwicz, Z.M., Dawidowicz, P., Jachner, A. and Lampert, W. (in press) Roach feeding behavior modified by alarm substance. 2. Reasons for different responses of fish in field and laboratory studies. Arch. Hydrobiol., 120.
11. Golterman, H. L. and Clymo, R.S. (eds) (1969) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Freshwaters. IBP Handbook, No. 8, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 188 pp.
12. Gulati, R.D., Lammens, E.H.R.R, Meijer, M.-L. and VanDonk, E. (eds) (1990) Biomanipulation - Tool for Water Management. Hydrobiologia 200/201. Kluver Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 628 pp.
13. Hall, D.J, Werner, E.E., Gilliam, J.F., Mittelbach, G.G., Howard, D. and Doner, C.G. (1979) Diel foraging behaviour and prey selection in the golden shiner (Notemigonus chrysoleucas). J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 36, 1029-1039.
14. Hrbacek, J. (1962) Species composition and the amount of zooplankton in relation to the fish stock. Rozpravy Ceskosloveske Akademie Véd. Rada Matematicko-Prirodovedecka, 72, 1-114.
15. Irwing, P.W. and Magurran, A.E. (1997) Context-dependent fright reaction in captive European minnows: the importance of naturalness in laboratory experiments. Anim. Behav., 53, 1193-1201.
16. Krebs, C.J. (1985) Ecology. The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, Harper and Raw Publishers, New York, 800 pp.
17. Lawton, J.H., Beddington, J. and Bonser, R. (1974) Switching in invertebrate predators. In Usher, M.B. and Williamson, M.H. (eds) Ecological Stability. Chapman and Hall, London.
18. Mlonek, A. (1998) Day and Nighttime Depth Distribution in Planktonic Crustaceans in 15 Lakes of North-Eastern Poland. M.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 39 pp. (in Polish).
19. Murdoch, W.W., Avery, S. and Smyth, M.E.B. (1975) Switching in predatory fish. Ecology, 56, 1094-1105.
20. O'Brien, W.J. (1987) Planktivory by freshwater fish: thrust and parry in the pelagia. In Kerfoot, W.C. and Sih, A. (eds), Predation. Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. University Press of New England, Hanover and London, pp. 5-16.
21. O'Brien, W.J., Slade, N.A. and Viniard, G.L. (1976) Apparent size as the determinant of prey selection by bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology, 57, 1304-1310.
22. Saunders, P.A., Porter, K.G. and Taylor, B.E. (1999) Population dynamics of Daphnia spp. and implications for trophic interactions in a small monomictic lake. J. Plankton Res., 23, 1823-1845.
23. Sommer, U. (ed.) (1989) Plankton Ecology. Succession in Plankton Communities. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 369 pp.
24. Sommer, U., Gliwicz, Z.M., Lampert, W. and Duncan, A. (1986) The PEG-model of seasonal succession of planktonic events in fresh waters. Arch. Hydrobiol., 106, 433-471.
25. Werner, E.E. and Gilliam, J.F. (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 15, 393-425
26. Werner, E.E. and Hall, D.J. (1974) Optimal foraging and the size selection of prey by the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology, 55, 1042-1052.
27. Werner, E.E., Mittelbach, G.G. and Hall, D.J. (1981) The role of foraging profitability and experience in habitat use by the bluegill sunfish. Ecology, 62, 116-125.
28. Wisniowska, Z. (1999) Ontogenetic Shifts in the Diet of Roach Rutilus rutilus L. in Lake Ublik Maly. M.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw (in Polish).
29. Zaret, T.M. (1978) A predation model of zooplankton community structure. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol., 20, 2496-2500.