Changes in left ventricular function and mass during serial investigations after valve replacement for aortic stenosis

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 583-593

  Lund, Ole ^a,c   Erlandsen, Mogens ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART VENTRICLE FILLING; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOISOTOPE VENTRICULOGRAPHY;

AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; HYPERTROPHY, LEFT VENTRICULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIONUCLIDE VENTRICULOGRAPHY; STROKE VOLUME; TIME FACTORS; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 0033856088     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Del Rizzo DF, Goldman BS, Christakis GT, David TE. Hemodynamic benefits of the Toronto stentless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1431-1446
2. Jin XY, Zhang ZM, Gibson DG, Yacoub MH, Pepper JR. Effect of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:683-690
3. Thomson HL, O'Brien MF, Almeida AA, Tesar PJ, Davidson MB, Burstow DJ. Haemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression: A comparison of the stentless, stented and mechanical aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:572-575
4. Maselli D, Pizio R, Bruno LP, Di Bella I, De Gasperis C. Left ventricular mass reduction after aortic valve replacement: Homografts, stentless and stented valves. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:966-971
5. Lund O, Jensen FT. Functional status and left ventricular performance late after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Relation to preoperative data. Eur Heart J 1988;9:1234-1243
6. Lund O, Jensen FT. Late cardiac deaths after isolated valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Relation to impaired left ventricular diastolic performance. Angiology 1989;40:199-208
7. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli W. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham study. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1561-1566
8. Lund O. Valve replacement for aortic stenosis: The curative potential of early operation. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;suppl.40:1-137
9. Lund O, Kristensen LH, Baandrup U, et al. Myocardial structure as a determinant of pre-and postoperative ventricular function and long-term prognosis after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 1998;19:1099-1108
10. Monrad ES, Hess OM, Mürakami T, Nonogi H, Corin WJ, Krayenbuehl HP. Time course of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 1988;77:1345-1355
11. Louis TA. General methods for analysing repeated measures. Stat Med 1988;7:29-45
12. Lund O, Emmertsen K, Nielsen TT, et al. Impact of size mismatch and left ventricular function on performance of the St. Jude disc valve after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1227-1234
13. Lund O, Flø C, Jensen FT, et al. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in aortic stenosis. Prognostic value after valve replacement and underlying mechanisms. Eur Heart J 1997;18:1977-1987
14. Quinones MA, Mokotoff DM, Nouri S, Winters WL, Miller RR. Non-invasive quantification of left ventricular wall stress. Validation of method and application to assessment of chronic pressure overload. Am J Cardiol 1980;45:782-790
15. Halle L, Angelsen BA, Tromsdal A. Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Br Heart J 1980;43:284-292
16. Sahn DJ, DeMeia A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation of echocardiography: Results of a survey of echocardiography measurements. Circulation 1978;58:1072-1083
17. Lund O, Rasmussen K, Jensen FT, Hansen HH. Left ventricular ejection fraction determined with the nuclear stethoscope, gamma camera and contrast ventriculography. Nucl Med Commun 1986;7:337-348
18. Jensen FT, Lund O, Erlandsen M. Reliability of three computer methods in the analysis of ECG-gated radionuclide left ventriculography: Interrecording, interobserver and intraobserver variability. Angiology 1991;42:866-877
19. Lund O, Flø C, Rasmussen BS, Jensen FT. Factors with modifying influence on normal right and left ventricular function at rest and during submaximal exercise in healthy volunteers. Int J Angiol 1997;6:80-88
20. Devereux RD, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: Anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977;55:613-618
21. ® System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc., 1996
22. Lund O, Nielsen TT, Emmertsen K, et al. Mortality and worsening of prognostic profile during waiting time for valve replacement in aortic stenosis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;44:289-295
23. Rediker DE, Boucher CA, Block PC, Akins CW, Buckley MJ, Fifer MA. Degree of reversibility of left ventricular systolic dysfunction after aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic valve stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:112-118
24. Hwang MH, Hammermeister KE, Oprian C, et al. Preoperative identification of patients likely to have left ventricular dysfunction after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 1989;80:I65-I76
25. De Paulis R, Sommariva L, De Matteis GM, et al. Extent and pattern of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with small size CarboMedics aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:901-909
26. Rohde LEP, Zhi G, Aranki SF, Beckel NE, Lee RT, Reimold SC. Gender-associated differences in left ventricular geometry in patients with aortic valve disease and effect of distinct overload subsets. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:475-480