A new illusion demonstrates long-range processing

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 19, 2000, Pages 2545-2549

  Popple, Ariella V ^a   Levi, Dennis M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Fraser illusion; Orientation averaging

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AVERAGING; ENERGY; HUMAN; ILLUSION; MODEL; ORIENTATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION;

HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033854570     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00127-9     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Dakin S.C., Watt R.J. The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture. Vision Research. 37:1997;3181-3192.
2. Finney D.J. Probit analysis. 3rd ed. 1971;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Mesrobian E, Skrzypek J. Segmenting textures using cells with adaptive receptive fields. Spatial Vision. 9:1995;163-190.
4. Morgan M.J., Baldassi S. How the human visual system encodes the orientation of a texture and why it makes mistakes. Current Biology. 7:1997;999-1002.
5. Morgan, M. J., Mason, A. J. S., & Baldassi, S. (2000). Are there separate first-order and second-order mechanisms for orientation discrimination? Vision Research, 40, 1751-1763.
6. Morgan M., Castet E., Ward R. Visual search for a tilted target: tests of the spatial uncertainty model. QJEP. 51:1998;347-371.
7. Moulden, B. (1994). Collator units: second-stage orientational filters. Higher-order processing in the visual system. Ciba Foundation Symposium 184 (pp. 170-192). Chichester: Wiley.
8. Polat U., Tyler C.W. What pattern the eye sees best. Vision Research. 39:1999;887-895.
9. Ringach D.L., Hawken M.J., Shapley R. Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque primary visual cortex. Nature. 387:1997;281-284.