Local planners and limits on local residential development

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 295-305

  Neiman, Max ^a   Fernandez, Kenneth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; LOCAL PLANNING; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033854138     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360008976108     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ackerman, W. V., 1999. Growth control versus the growth machine in Redlands, California:Conflict in urban land use. Urban Geography, 20:146–167.
2. Adang, P. J., 1964. Snob zoning:A look at the economic and social impact of low density zoning. Syracuse Law Review, 15:507–511.
3. Babcock, R., and Bosselman, F. P., 1973. Exclusionary zoning:Land use regulation and housing in the 1970s, New York:Praeger.
4. Baldassare, M., 1985. Predicting local concern about growth:The roots of citizen discontent. Journal of Urban Affairs, 6:39–49.
5. Baldassare, M., and Protash, W., 1982. Growth controls, population growth, and community satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 47:339–346.
6. Baldassare, M., and Wilson, G., 1996. Changing sources of suburban support for local growth controls. Urban Studies, 33:459–471.
7. Bollens, S. A., 1990. Constituencies for limitation and regionalism:Approaches to growth management. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26:46–68.
8. Branfman, E. J., Cohen, B. I., and Trubek, D. M., 1973. Measuring the invisible wall:Land use controls and the residential patterns of the poor. Yale Law Journal, 82:483–507.
9. Calavita, N., and Caves, R., 1994. Planners' attitudes toward growth:A comparative case study. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60:483–500.
10. Caves, R., 1992. Land use planning:The ballot box revolution, New-bury Park, CA:Sage.
11. Clavel, P., and Klaniewski, N., 1990. “ Space for progressive local policy:Examples from the United States and the United Kingdom ”. In Beyond the city limits:Urban policy and economic restructuring in comparative perspective, Edited by:Logan, J., and Swanstrom, T., 199–234. Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
12. Coleman, J., 1957. Community conflict, New York:Free Press.
13. Coyle, D. J., 1993. Property rights and the constitution:Shaping society through land use regulation, Albany:State University of New York Press.
14. Crain, R., Katz, E., and Rosenthal, D., 1969. The politics of community conflict:The fluoridation decision, New York:Bobbs-Merrill.
15. Cullen, J., and Knox, P., 1981. The triumph of the eunuch:Planners, urban managers, and the suppression of political opposition. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 17:149–172.
16. Dalton, L., and Burby, R., 1994. Mandates, plans and planners:Building local commitment to development management. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60:444–462.
17. 1994. Dolan v. City of Tigard 114 S. Ct. 2309
18. Donovan, T., 1991. Politics and the adoption of local development policies in Southern California cities, Doctoral Dissertation Riverside:Political Science Department, University of California.
19. Donovan, T., 1993. Community controversy and the adoption of economic development policies. Social Science Quarterly, 74:386–402.
20. Donovan, T., and Neiman, M., 1992. Community social status, suburban growth, and local government restrictions on residential development. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 28:323–333.
21. Elkin, S., 1987. City and regime:The American republic, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
22. Ellickson, R., 1977. Suburban growth controls:An economic and legal analysis. Yale Law Journal, 86:389–511.
23. Feagin, J., 1983. The urban real estate game, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
24. Fischel, W. A., 1995. Regulatory takings:Law, economics, and politics, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
25. Fleischmann, A., Green, G. P., and Kwong, T. M., 1992. What's a city to do? Explaining differences in local economic development policies. Western Political Quarterly, 45:677–700.
26. Frieden, B. J., 1979. The environmental protection hustle, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
27. Gamson, W., 1968. “ Rancorous conflict in community politics ”. In Community structure and decision making, Edited by:Clark, T., 197–214. San Francisco:Chandler.
28. Glickfeld, M., and Levine, N., 1991. The new land use regulation “revolution”:Why California's local jurisdictions enact growth control and management measures, Los Angeles:Extension Public Policy Program, University of California.
29. Gottdiener, M., 1987. The decline of urban politics:Political theory and the crisis of the local state, Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
30. Gottdiener, M., and Neiman, M., 1981. Characteristics of support for local growth control. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 17:55–73.
31. Haar, C. M., 1996. Suburbs under siege:Race, space, and audacious judges, Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
32. Harvey, D., 1973. Social justice and the city, Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Henig, J., 1982. Neighborhood mobilization:Redevelopment and response, New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press.
34. James, F., and Windsor, O. D., 1976. Fiscal zoning, fiscal reform, and exclusionary land use controls. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 42:130–141.
35. Kirby, R. F., deLeeuw, F., and Silverman, W., 1972. Residential zoning and equal housing opportunities:A case study in Black Jack, Missouri, Washington, DC:Urban Institute.
36. Lineberry, R. L., 1977. Equality and urban policy:The distribution of municipal public services, Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
37. Logan, J., and Zhou, M., 1990. The adoption of growth controls in suburban communities. Sociological Quarterly, 21:118–129.
38. Long, N. E., 1972. The unwalled city:Reconstituting the urban community, New York:Basic Books.
39. 1992. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Commission 112 S. Ct.
40. Mladenka, K. R., 1989. The distribution of an urban public service:The changing role of race and politics. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 24:391–407.
41. Molotch, H., 1976. The city as a growth machine:Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82:309–332.
42. Navarro, P., and Carson, R., 1989. Growth controls:Policy analysis for the second generation. Policy Sciences, 22:1–21.
43. Neiman, M., 1975. Metropology:Toward a more constructive research agenda, Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
44. Neiman, M., 1980. Zoning policy, income clustering, and suburban change. Social Science Quarterly, 61:666–675.
45. Neiman, M., and Loveridge, R., 1981. Environmentalism and local growth control:A probe into the class bias thesis. Environment and Behavior, 13:759–772.
46. Pagano, M. A., and Bowman, A. O., 1995. Cityscapes and capital:The politics of urban development, Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
47. Peterson, P., 1981. City limits, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
48. Platt, R. H., 1996. Land use and society:Geography, law, and public policy, Washington, DC:Island Press.
49. Protash, W., and Baldassare, M., 1984. Growth politics and community satisfaction. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 18:397–412.
50. Sacks, S., and Campbell, A. K., 1964. The fiscal zoning game. Municipal Finance, 35:140–149.
51. Sager, L. G., 1969. Tight little islands:Exclusionary zoning, equal protection, and the indigent. Stanford Law Review, 23:1418–1441.
52. Siegan, B. H., 1976. Other people's property, Lexington, MA:Lexington Books.
53. Stone, C., 1989. Regime politics:Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988, Lawrence:University Press of Kansas.
54. Stone, C., and Sanders, H., 1987. The politics of urban development, Lawrence:University Press of Kansas.
55. Swanstrom, T., 1985. The crisis of growth politics, Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
56. Tempest, R., November 2 1999. “ Decisions on growth come to the ballot box ”. In Los Angeles Times November 2, A1A3
57. Vasu, M., 1979. Politics and planning:A national survey of American planners, Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina Press.
58. White, M. J., 1978. Self-interest in the suburbs:The trend toward no growth. Policy Analysis, 4:185–203.
59. Wintner, L., 1984. An argument for an antitrust attack on exclusionary zoning. Brooklyn Law Review, 50:1035–1102.
60. Zorn, P., Hanson, D., and Schwartz, S., 1986. Mitigating the price effects of growth control:A case study of Davis, California. Land Economics, 62:46–57.