The pitfalls of pitfalls: A comparison of pitfall trap catches and absolute density estimates of epigeal invertebrate predators in arable land

Anzeiger fur Schadlingskunde

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 99-106

  Lang, A ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION; AGRICULTURAL ECOSYSTEM; INVERTEBRATE; PITFALL TRAP; SAMPLING BIAS;

EID: 0033849361     PISSN: 14365693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02956438     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Problems of interpreting arthropod sampling with pitfall traps
2. A comparison of pitfall trapping and quadrate sampling of Carabidae (Coleoptera) on river banks
3. Catches in pitfall traps in relation to mean densities of carabid beetles
4. Abundanz und aktivitatsdichte epigaischer raubarthropoden auf ackerflachen - ein vergleich
5. Forschungsverbund Agrarokosysteme Munchen (FAM) - Erfassung, Prognose und Bewertung nutzungsbedingter Veranderungen in Agrarokosystemen und deren Umwelt
6. Pitfall trapping within enclosures: A method for estimating the relationship between the abundances of coexisting carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
7. Estimation of epigeic spider population density using an intensive D-vac sampling technique and comparison with pitfall trap catches in winter wheat
8. The interpretation of pitfall catches of Pterostichus cupreus and Pt. melanarius (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in cereal fields
9. Methodisches zur Ermittlung der Siedlungsdichte von Bodentieren aus Quadrat-proben und Barberfallen
10. Pitfall trapping as a method for studying populations of Carabidae (Coleoptera)
11. The efficiency of pitfall trapping for polyphagous predatory Carabidae
12. Validation of the use of pitfall traps to the study of carabid population in cereal field headlands
13. Some effects of polyphagous predators on an outbreak of cereal aphid (Sitobion avenae F.) and orange wheat blossom midge (Sitodiplosis mosellana Gehin)
14. Quantifying the impact of polyphagous invertebrate predators in controlling cereal aphids and in preventing wheat yield and quality reductions
15. The effect of crop density and microclimate on pitfall trap catches of Carabidae, Staphylinidae (Coleoptera), and Lycosidae (Araneae) in cereal fields
16. Estimating beneficial arthropod densities using emergence traps, pitfall traps and the flooding method in organic fields (Vienna, Austria)
17. Invertebrate epigeal predators in arable land: population densities, biomass and predator-prey interactions in the field with special reference to ground beetles and wolf spiders
18. Predation by ground beetles and wolf spiders on herbivorous insects in a maize crop
19. Some features influencing the efficiency of pitfall traps
20. Biology of polyphagous ground beetles in agriculture
21. Observation of epigeic predators and predation on artificial prey in cereal field
22. A comparison of D-Vac suction, fenced and unfenced pitfall trap sampling of epigeal arthropods in agro-ecosystems
23. Verzeichnis der Spinnentiere (excl. Acarida) Deutschlands (Arachnida: Araneida, Opilionida, Pseudoscorpionida)
24. Pedotransfer-Funktionen zum Wasserund Stoffhaushalt Einer Bodenlandschaft
25. Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps: The madness and the method
26. Estimating population densities of spiders in cereals
27. Density estimation for beneficial predators in agroecosystems
28. Behavioural responses of three linyphiid spiders to pitfall traps
29. Limitations to the use of pitfall traps in ecological studies exemplified by a study of spiders in a field of winter wheat
30. A comparison of pitfall trap catches and absolute density estimates of carabid beetles in oilseed rape fields