Comparison of two methods of training student physical therapists to score the gross motor function measure

Pediatric Physical Therapy

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 127-132

  Lim, Helcn H ^a   Marriott, David A ^c   Potter, Paul D ^d   Clayton Krasinski, Debra ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b Program in Physical Therapy   (United States)

^c Franziska Racker Centers   (United States)

^d Mount Washington Pediatric Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted instruction; Evaluation studies; Pediatrics methods; Physical therapy education; Reproducibility of results

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD CARE; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; MEDICAL STUDENT; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; SCORING SYSTEM; TEACHING; TRAINING;

EID: 0033847470     PISSN: 08985669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001577-200012030-00005     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Measurement in developmental therapy: Past, present, and future
2. Standards for tests and measurements in physical therapy practice
3. Training users in the Gross Motor Function Measure: Methodological and practical issues
4. Issues in measuring change in motor function in children with cerebral palsy: A special communication
5. Training design for performance improvement
6. Training and development in work organizations
7. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
8. Instructing occupational therapy students in information retrieval
9. Individual attributes and training performance
10. Trainees' attributes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness