Genetic diversity and population structure of the serpentine endemic Calystegia collina (Convolvulaceae) in northern California

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 87, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 1138-1146

  Wolf, Amy T ^a   Howe, Robert W ^b   Hamrick, James L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Calystegia collina; Clonal plant; Convolvulaceae; Genetic diversity; Habitat fragmentation; Population structure; Serpentine endemic; Somatic mutation

Indexed keywords

ENDEMIC SPECIES; GENETIC VARIATION; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SERPENTINE;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

CALYSTEGIA COLLINA; CONVOLVULACEAE; EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 0033840595     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2656650     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. BARRETT, S. C. H., AND J. R. KOHN. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In D. A. Falk and K. E. Holsinger [eds.], Genetics and conservation of rare plants, 3-30. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
2. BARTON, N. H., AND M. SLATKIN. 1986. A quasi-equilibrium theory of the distribution of rare alleles in a sub-divided population. Heredity 56: 409-415.
3. BOSSART, J. L., AND D. P. PROWELL. 1998. Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: Limitations, lessons and new directions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 202-206.
4. BROOKS, R. R. 1987. Serpentine and its vegetation: a multidisciplinary approach. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.
5. BROYLES, S. B., A. SCHNABEL, AND R. WYATT. 1994. Evidence for long-distance pollen dispersal in milkweeds (Asclepias exaltata). Evolution 48: 1032-1040.
6. CHELIAK, W. M., AND J. A. PITEL. 1984. Techniques for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from forest tree species. Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Information Report P1-X-42. Canadian Forestry Service, Agriculture, Canada.
7. CROW, J. F., AND K. AOKI. 1984. Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 81: 6073-6077.
8. D'AMATO, F. 1997. Role of somatic mutations in the evolution of higher plants. Caryologia 50: 1-15.
9. DE KROON, H., AND J. VAN GROENENDAEL. 1997. The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.
10. ELLSTRAND, N. C., AND D. R. ELAM. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 217-242.
11. GILES, B. E., AND J. GOUDET. 1997. Genetic differentiation in Silene dioica metapopulations: estimation of spatiotemporal effects in a successional plant species. American Naturalist 149: 507-526.
12. HAMRICK, J. L., AND M. J. GODT. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In A. D. H. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler, and B. S. Weir [eds.], Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resources, 43-63. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
13. HANSKI, I. A., AND M. E. GILPIN. 1991. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
14. HARPER, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London, UK.
15. HARTL, D. L. 1988. A primer of population genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
16. HEDRICK, P. W. 1985. Genetics of populations. Jones and Bartlett, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
17. HOLSINGER, K. E. 1993. The evolutionary dynamics of fragmented plant populations. In P. M. Kareiva, J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Huey [eds.], Biotic interactions and global change, 198-216. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
18. _, AND L. D. GOTTLIEB. 1991. Conservation of rare and endangered plants: principles and prospects. In D. A. Falk and K. E. Holsinger [eds.], Genetics and conservation of rare plants, 195-208. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
19. KARRON, J. D. 1991. Patterns of genetic variation and breeding systems in rare plant species. In D. A. Falk and K. E. Holsinger [eds.], Genetics and conservation of rare plants, 87-98. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
20. KIM, S. T., AND M. G. CHUNG. 1995. Genetic and clonal structure in Korean populations of Calystegia japonica (Convolvulaceae). Botanical Bulletin Academia Sinica 36: 135-141.
21. KINOSHITA, T., AND K. MORI. 1998. Somaclonal selection of physiological mutants and several problems related to rice cell breeding. Journal of Applied Genetics 39: 9-35.
22. KLEKOWSKI, E. J., JR. 1997. Somatic mutation theory of clonality. In H. de Kroon and J. van Groenendael [eds.], The ecology and evolution of clonal plants, 227-241. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.
23. KRUCKEBERG, A. R. 1984. California serpentines: flora, vegetation, geology, soils and management problems. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
24. LEWIS, P. O., AND D. ZAYKIN. 1996. Genetic Data Analysis: Software for the analysis of discrete genetic data. Computer program distributed by the authors. University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
25. LI, C. C., AND D. G. HORVITZ. 1953. Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. American Journal of Human Genetics 5: 107-117.
26. MALUSZYNSKI, M., B. S. AHLOOWALIA, AND B. SIGURBJORNSSON. 1995. Application of in vivo and in vitro mutation techniques for crop improvement. Euphytica 85: 303-315.
27. MANLY, B. F. J. 1991. Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
28. MCCUE, K. A., E. S. BUCKLER, AND T. P. HOLTSFORD. 1996. A hierarchical view of genetic structure in the rare annual plant Clarkia springvillensis. Conservation Biology 10: 1425-1434.
29. MCLELLAN, A. J., D. PRATI, O. KALTZ, AND B. SCHMID. 1997. Structure and analysis of phoenotypic and genetic variation in clonal plants. In H. de Kroon, and J. van Groenendael [eds.], The ecology and evolution of clonal plants, 185-210. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.
30. NEI, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106: 283-291.
31. _. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 70: 3321-3323.
32. _. 1977. F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Annals of Human Genetics 41: 225-233.
33. PETIT, R. J., A. EL MOUSADIK, AND O. PONS. 1998. Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conservation Biology 12: 844-855.
34. RAVEN, P. H., AND D. I. AXELROD. 1978. Origin and relationships of the California flora. University of California Publications in Botany 72: 1-134.
35. RAYMOND, M., AND F. ROUSSET. 1995. GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248-249.
36. REAL, L. A. 1994. Ecological genetics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
37. RICHARDS, A. J. 1996. Genetic variability in obligate apomicts of the genus Taraxacum. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 31: 405-414.
38. SALOMONSON, A. 1996. Interactions between somatic mutations and plant development. Vegetatio 127: 71-75.
39. SCHAAL, B. A., AND W. J. LEVERICH. 1996. Molecular variation in isolated plant populations. Plant Species Biology 11: 33-40.
40. SKINNER, M. W., AND B. M. PAVLIK. 1994. California Native Plant Society's inventory of rare and endangered plants of California. California Native Plant Society Special Publication Number 1, Sacramento, California, USA.
41. SLATKIN, M., AND N. H. BARTON. 1989. A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution 43: 1349-1368.
42. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROHLF. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.
43. SOLTIS, D. E., C. H. HAUFLER, D. C. DARROW, AND G. J. GASTONY. 1983. Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. American Fern Journal 73: 9-27.
44. WAGNER, D. L., AND E. J. BORTUGNO. 1982. Geologic map of the Santa Rosa Quadrangle, California, 1:250,000. State of California, Resources Agency, Sacramento, California, USA.
45. WEIR, B. S. 1990. Genetic data analysis. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
46. _, AND C. C. COCKERHAM. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
47. WENDEL, J. F., AND C. R. PARKS. 1982. Genetic control of isozyme variation in Camillia japonica L. Heredity 73: 197-204.
48. WOLF, A. T. 1998. Population structure and reproductive ecology of serpentine endemic plant species in California's North Coast Range. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
49. _, S. P. HARRISON, AND J. L. HAMRICK. 2000. Influence of habitat patchiness on genetic diversity and spatial structure of a serpentine endemic plant. Conservation Biology 14: 452-463.
50. WORKMAN, P. L., AND J. D. NISWANDER. 1970. Population studies of southwestern Indian tribes: 2. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. American Journal of Human Genetics 22: 4-49.
51. WRIGHT, S. 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. American Naturalist 56: 330-338.
52. _. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.
53. _. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15: 324-354.
54. YOUNG, A., T. BOYLE, AND T. BROWN. 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 413-418.