Conventional running suture and continuous double loop closure: An experimental study of wound strength

European Journal of Surgery

Volumn 166, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 647-649

  Cengiz, Y ^a   Mansson, P ^a   Israelsson, L A ^a  

^a SUNDSVALL HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Incisional hernia; Postoperative complications; Suture technique; Wound dehiscence

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROTOMY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL WOUND; SUTURING METHOD; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

EID: 0033837799     PISSN: 11024151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/110241500750008321     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. The causes of abdominal wound disruption
2. Abdominal incisions and their closure
3. Abdominal wound dehiscence
4. Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions
5. The burst abdominal wound: A mechanical approach
6. Tensile strength advantage of the far and near suture technique
7. Continuous double loop closure: A new technique for repair of laparotomy wounds
8. Influence of abdominal-wound closure technique on complications after surgery: A randomised study
9. Single layer mass closure of major laparotomies by continuous suturing
10. Suture technique and wound healing strength
11. Abdominal wound closure: A randomized prospective study in 571 patients comparing continuous versus interrupted suture techniques
12. Novafil. A dynamic suture for wound closure