Exploring the spatial relationship between census and land-cover data

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 599-609

  Radeloff, Volker C ^a   Hagen, Alice E ^a   Voss, Paul R ^a   Field, Donald R ^a   Mladenoff, David J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Census data; GIS; Housing density; Land cover classification; Landscape ecology; Pine Barrens; Remote sensing; Wisconsin

Indexed keywords

CENSUS; GIS; LAND COVER; REMOTE SENSING; SOCIAL STRUCTURE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033834550     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920050114646     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Borgerding, E. A., G. A. Bartellt, and W. M. Cowen, eds. 1995. The future of pine barrens in northwest Wisconsin: A workshop summary, Solon Springs, Wisconsin, September 21 1993-September 23 1993. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin.
2. Chittick, D. 1955. Growth and decline of South Dakota trade centers 1901-1951. Brookings, SD: South Dakota State University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 448.
3. Galpin, C. J. 1915. The social anatomy of an agricultural community. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 34.
4. Howard, D. C., R. M. Fuller, and C. J. Barr. 1996. Linking ecological information recorded from ground, air and space: Examples from Countryside Survey 1990. Global Ecol. Biogeography Lett. 5:227-234.
5. Imhoff, M. L., W. T. Lawrence, D. C. Stutzer, and C. D. Elvidge. 1997. A technique for using composite DMSP/OLS "city lights" satellite data to map urban area. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sensing 61:361-370.
6. Landis, P. H. 1938. Washington farm trade centers 1900-1935. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 360.
7. Lillesand, T. M., and R. W. Kiefer. 1994. Remote sensing and image interpretation, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
8. Lively, C. E. 1932. Growth and decline of farm trade centers in Minnesota 1905-1930. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 287.
9. Lo, C. P., and B. J. Faber. 1997. Integration of Landsat Thematic Mapper and census data for quality of life assessment. Remote Sensing Environ. 62:143-157.
10. Luman, D. E., and M. H. Ji. 1995. The Lake Michigan ozone study-An application of satellite-based land-use and land-cover mapping to large-area emissions inventory analysis. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sensing 61:1021-1032.
11. Marcal, A. R. S., and G. G. Wright. 1997. The use of "overlapping" NOAA-AVHRR NDVI maximum value composites for Scotland and initial comparisons with the land cover census on a Scottish regional and district basis. Int. J. Remote Sensing 18:491-503.
12. Mesev, V. 1998. The use of census data in urban image classification. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sensing 64:431-438.
13. Mladenoff, D. J., T. A. Sickley, R. G. Haight, and A. P. Wydeven. 1995. A regional landscape analysis and prediction of favorable gray wolf habitat in the northern great lakes region. Conserv. Biol. 9:279-294.
14. Murphy, R. E. 1931. Geography of northwestern pine barrens of Wisconsin. Trans. Wise. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 26:96-120.
15. Radeloff, V. C., D. J. Mladenoff, H. S. He, and M. S. Boyce. 1999. Forest landscape change in the northwest Wisconsin Pine Barrens from pre-European settlement to the present. Can. J. Forest Res. 29:1649-1659.
16. Radeloff, V. C., D. J. Mladenoff, K. L. Manies, and M. S. Boyce. 1998. Analyzing forest landscape restoration potential: Pre-settlement and current distribution of oak in the northwest Wisconsin Pine Barrens. Trans. Wisc. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 86:189-205.
17. Sutton, P., C. Roberts, C. Eldvidge, and H. Meij. 1997. A comparison of nighttime satellite imagery and population density for the continental United States. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sensing 63:1303-1313.
18. Turner, M. G., D. N. Wear, and R. O. Flamm. 1996. Land ownership and land-cover change in the southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula. Ecol. Appl. 6:1150-1172.
19. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1991. Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Summary Tape File 1, Wisconsin. Prepared by the Bureau of the Census, Washington DC.
20. Vogelmann, J. E., T. Sohl, and S. M. Howard. 1998. Regional characterization of land cover using multiple data sources. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sensing 64:45-57.
21. Voss, P. R., D. R. Field, and L. P. Kyllo. 1991. Rural ecosystem analysis and TIGER/GIS: Applications for an emerging technology. Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Rural Sociological Society, Columbus, OH, August.
22. Wear, D. N., M. G. Turner, and R. O. Flamm. 1996. Ecosystem management with multiple owners: Landscape dynamics in a southern Appalachian watershed. Ecol. Appl. 6:1173-1188.
23. Wolter, P. T., D. J. Mladenoff, G. E. Host, and T. R. Crow. 1995. Improved forest classification in the Northern Lake States using multi-temporal Landsat imagery. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sensing 61:1129-1143.