Interface between valve disease and ischaemic heart disease

Heart

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 347-352

  Iung, Bernard ^a  

^a BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY DISEASE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MITRAL VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION;

EID: 0033827157     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1486-88. • These recent guidelines summarise most aspects of the management of valvar diseases, in particular as regards paraclinic assessment and indications for surgery. Recommendations are given regarding indications for coronary angiography in patients with valvar disease and for aortic valve replacement in patients undergoing coronary surgery.
2. Kvidal P, Bergström R, Hörte LG, et al. Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:747-56. • This large series with a long term follow up is particularly interesting owing to its analysis not only of absolute survival, but also relative survival as compared with a standard population. This provides useful information on predictive factors of late results of aortic valve replacement, in particular in patients aged over 70 years.
3. Akins CW, Daggett WM, Vlahakes GJ, et al. Cardiac operations in patients 80 years old and older. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:606-15.
4. Gilbert T, Orr W, Banning AP. Surgery for aortic stenosis in severely symptomatic patients older than 80 years: experience in a single UK centre. Heart 1999;82:138-42.
5. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, et al. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular health study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:630-4. • A large population based study which enables the frequency of different degrees of aortic stenosis to be assessed. The analysis of predictive factors suggests the possibility of common factors in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and degenerative aortic stenosis.
6. Lund O, Flo C, Jensen FT, et al. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in aortic stenosis. Prognostic value after valve replacement and underlying mechanisms. Eur Heart J 1997;18:1977-87.
7. Mullany CJ, Elveback LR, Frye RL, et al. Coronary artery disease and its management: influence on survival in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;10:66-72. • A comparative study of patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement with or without coronary disease and patients undergoing combined aortic and coronary surgery over two time periods. The results support a wide use of preoperative coronary angiography and the association of bypass grafting with aortic valve replacement.
8. Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Gill CC. Aortic valve replacement combined with myocardial revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;95:402-14. • A study of 500 patients treated by combined aortic valve replacement and coronary surgery, with a 10 year follow up and an analysis of the predictive factors of late results.
9. Czer LS, Gray RJ, Stewart ME, et al. Reduction in sudden late death by concomitant revascularization with aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;95:390-401. • This comparative study comprises 474 patients operated on for aortic valve replacement with or without bypass grafting. Despite differences in patient characteristics, long term results (up to 12 years) suggest a benefit of associating coronary and aortic surgery.
10. Lund O, Nielsen TT, Pilegaard HK, et al. The influence of coronary artery disease and bypass grafting on early and late survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:327-37.
11. Iung B, Drissi MF, Michel PL, et al. Prognosis of valve replacement for aortic stenosis with or without coexisting coronary heart disease: a comparative study. J Heart Valve Dis 1993;2:259-266. • This study compared 144 patients treated by combined aortic and coronary surgery with 144 other patients operated on for aortic stenosis with normal coronary arteries, and who were matched for the main predictors of immediate and late results. There is a trend toward a higher operative mortality but not towards late death in the patients who had combined surgery.
12. Flameng WJ, Herijgers P, Szecsi J, et al. Determinants of early and late results of combined valve operations and coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:621-8.
13. Bonow RO, Kent KM, Rosing D, et al. Aortic valve replacement without myocardial revascularization in patients with combined aortic valvular and coronary artery disease. Circulation 1981;63:243-51. • This comparative study reports good results of isolated aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease. However, the low severity of coronary lesions (18% of three vessel disease) and the follow up of only four years limit the relevance of the findings.
14. Brener SJ, Duffy CI, Thomas JD, et al. Progression of aortic stenosis in 394 patients: relation to changes in myocardial and mitral valve dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995,25:305-10.
15. Odell JA, Mullany CJ, Schaff HV, et al. Aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1424-30. • This series includes 145 patients operated on for aortic valve replacement after a previous coronary bypass grafting. It shows an increased operative morbidity and mortality, and generally recommends valve replacement in patients with moderate aortic stenosis who need coronary surgery.
16. Jones EL, Weintraub WS, Craver JM, et al. Interaction of age and coronary disease after valve replacement: implications for valve selection. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:378-85.
17. Acar J, Iung B, Boissel JP, et al. AREVA: multicenter randomized comparison of low-dose vs. standard dose anticoagulation in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. Circulation 1996;94:2107-12. • This prospective, randomised trial concludes that there is a benefit from using moderate anticoagulation in selected patients after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis. This is associated with a lower rate of bleeding without increasing the thromboembolic risk.
18. Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Gill CC, et al. Mitral valve replacement combined with myocardial revascularization: early and late results for 300 patients, 1970 to 1983. Circulation 1985;71:1179-90.
19. He GW, Hughes CF, McCaughan B, et al. Mitral valve replacement combined with coronary artery operation: determinants of early and late results. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;51:916-23.
20. Triboulloy C, Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, et al. Impact of preoperative symptoms on survival after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation. Rationale for optimizing surgical indications. Circulation 1999;99:400-5.