Critique of and limitations on the use of expert judgements in accident consequence uncertainty analysis

Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 325-330

  McKay, M ^a   Meyer, M ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; LICENSING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NUCLEAR ACCIDENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

EID: 0033821641     PISSN: 01448420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033155     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Group consensus probability distributions: A critical survey
2. Expert judgement for a probabilistic accident consequence uncertainty analysis
3. Combining probability distributions: A critique and annotated bibliography
4. Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis
5. Combining experts' opinions using a normal-wishart model
6. Correlations and copulas for decision and risk analysis
7. Processing expert judgements in accident consequence modelling
8. Conflict of belief: When advisors disagree
9. 'Expert Information' versus 'Expert Opinion': Another approach to the problem of Eliciting/Combining/Using Expert Opinion in PRA
10. A framework for sensitivity analysis in multi-objective decision making
11. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments
12. Nonparametric variance-based methods of assessing uncertainty importance
13. A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output
14. Evaluating prediction uncertainty in simulation models
15. 2 to measure uncertainty importance
16. A theory of requisite decision models