Promoting democratic governance in the south

European Journal of Development Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 23-57

  Crawford, Gordon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AID ORGANIZATION; CIVIL SOCIETY; DEMOCRACY; DEVELOPMENT AID; GOVERNANCE APPROACH;

EID: 0033817077     PISSN: 09578811     EISSN: 17439728     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09578810008426751     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Andreassen, B.-A. and T. Swinehart, 1992, ‘Promoting Human Rights in Poor Countries: The New Political Conditionality of Aid Policies’, in B.-A. Andreassen, and T. Swinehart (eds.), Human Rights in Developing Countries Yearbook 1991, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp.vii-xviii.
2. Barya, J.-J. B., 1993, ‘The New Political Conditionalities of Aid: An Independent View from Africa’, IDS Bulletin, Vol.24, No.1, pp. 16-23.
3. Beetham, D. and K. Boyle, 1995, Introducing Democracy: Eighty Questions and Answers, Cambridge: Polity Press, in association with UNESCO.
4. Burnell, P., 1993, ‘Good Government’ and Foreign Aid, PAIS Working Paper No.115, Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick.
5. Burnell, P, 1994, ‘Good Government and Democratization: A Sideways Look at Aid and Political Conditionality’, Democratization, Vol.1, No.3, pp.485-503.
6. Carothers, T., 1995, ‘Recent US Experience with Democracy Promotion’, IDS Bulletin, Vol.26, No.2, pp.62-9.
7. Carothers, T., 1997, ‘Democracy Assistance: The Question of Strategy’, Democratization, Vol.4, No.3, pp.109-32.
8. Carothers, T., 1999, Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
9. Clayton, A. (ed.), 1994, Governance, Democracy and Conditionality: What Role for NGOs?, Oxford: Intrac.
10. Crawford, G., 1995, Promoting Democracy, Human Rights and Good Governance Through Development Aid, Working Paper No.1, Centre for Démocratisation Studies, University of Leeds.
11. Crawford, G., 1998, ‘Aid and Political Reform: A Comparative Study of the Development Co¬operation Policies of Four Northern Donors’, Ph.D. thesis. Department of Politics, University of Leeds.
12. Crawford, G., 2000, ‘European Union Development Co-operation and the Promotion of Democracy’, in P. Burnell (ed.), Democracy Assistance: International Co-operation for Democratization, London and Portland, OR: Frank Cass (forthcoming).
13. Dahl, R., 1971, Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14. De Feyter, K. et al., 1995, Development Co-operation: A Tool for the Promotion of Human Rights and Democratization, Brussels: Belgian Ministry for Development Co-operation.
15. Department for International Development (DFID), 1999, Departmental Report 1999, London: DFID.
16. Diamond, L., 1991, The Democratic Revolution: Struggles for Freedom and Pluralism in the Developing World, New York: Freedom House.
17. Fox, L., 1995, Civil Society: A Conceptual Framework, Washington, DC: USAID.
18. Gills, B., Rocamora, J. and R. Wilson (eds.), 1993, Low Intensity Democracy: Political Power in the New World Order, London: Pluto Press.
19. Hansen, G., 1996, Constituencies for Reform: Strategic Approaches for Donor-Supported Civic Advocacy Programs, Washington, DC: Center for Development Information and Evaluation, USAID.
20. Hearn, J., 1999, Foreign Aid, Démocratisation and Civil Society in Africa: A Study of South Africa, Ghana and Uganda, IDS Discussion Paper 368, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
21. Heinz, W., Lingnau, H. and P. Waller, 1995, Evaluation of EC Positive Measures in Favour of Human Rights and Democracy, Berlin: German Development Institute.
22. Human Rights Watch, 1992, Human Rights Watch World Report 1993: Events of 1992, New York: Human Rights Watch.
23. IDS Bulletin, 1993, Good Government, Vol.24, No.1, Jan., Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
24. IDS Bulletin, 1995, Towards Democratic Governance, Vol.26, No.2, April, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
25. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA), 1999a, Dialogue for Democratic Development: Renewing the ACP-EU Partnership for the 21st Century - Conference Report, Stockholm: International IDEA.
26. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA), 1999b, Dialogue for Democratic Development: Policy Options for a Renewed ACP-EU Partnership, Stockholm: International IDEA.
27. Kiloh, M., 1997, ‘South Africa: Democracy Delayed’, in D. Potter et al. (eds.), Democratization, Cambridge: Polity Press, in association with the Open University, pp.294-320.
28. Lipjhart, A. 1984, Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries, New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
29. Nelson, J. and S.J. Eglinton, 1992, Encouraging Democracy: What Role for Conditioned Aid, Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council.
30. Ngunyi, M., 1996, Promoting Democracy through Positive Conditionality, Centre for Democratization Studies, University of Leeds.
31. Overseas Development Administration (ODA), 1993, Taking Account of Good Government, Technical Note No. 10, London: Overseas Development Administration.
32. Robinson, M., 1994, ‘Governance, Democracy and Conditionality: NGOs and the New Policy Agenda’, in A. Clayton (ed.), Governance, Democracy and Conditionality: What Role for NGOs?, pp.35-52, Oxford: Intrac.
33. Robinson, M., 1996, Strengthening Civil Society Through Foreign Political Aid (ESCOR Research Report R6234), Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
34. Robinson, W.I., 1996, Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, US Intervention and Hegemony, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Sorensen, G., 1993, ‘Democracy, Authoritarianism and State Strength’, in G. Sorensen (ed.), Political Conditionality, London: Frank Cass/EADI, pp.6-34.
36. Sorensen, G., 1995, ‘Conditionality, Democracy and Development’, in Stokke (ed.) [7995: 392-409].
37. Stokke, O., 1995, ‘Aid and Political Conditionality: Core Issues and State of the Art’, in Stokke (ed.) [7995: 1ST].
38. Stokke, O. (ed.), 1995, Aid and Political Conditionality (EADI Book Series 16), London: Frank Cass/EADI.
39. Swedish International Development Co-operation Agency (SIDA) (1997), Justice and Peace: Sida’s Programme for Peace, Democracy and Human Rights, Stockholm: SIDA.
40. Swedish International Development Co-operation Agency (SIDA) (1998), Human Rights and Democratic Governance: Facts and Figures for 1997, Stockholm: SIDA.
41. United States Agency for International Development (USAID), 1994, Democracy Sector Review, 22 Sept. 1994, mimeo.
42. United States Agency for International Development (USAID), undated, ‘Appendix 1’ document, Democracy Project Inventory, obtained March 1995, mimeo.
43. Van Rooy, A., 1998, ‘Civil Society as Idea: An Analytical Hatstand?’, in Van Rooy (ed.) [1998: 6-30].
44. Van Rooy, A. and M. Robinson, 1998, ‘Out of the Ivory Tower: Civil Society and the Aid System’, in Van Rooy (ed.) [1998: 31-70]
45. Van Rooy, A. (ed.), 1998, Civil Society and the Aid Industry, London: Earthscan.
46. White, G., 1994, ‘Civil Society, Democratization and Development (I): Clearing the Analytical Ground’, Democratization, Vol. 1, No.3, pp.375-90.
47. Wiseman, J., 1997, ‘The Rise and Fall and Rise (and Fall?) of Democracy in Sub-Saharan Africa’, in D. Potter etal. (eds.), Democratization, Cambridge: Polity Press, in association with the Open University, pp.272-93.
48. World Development Movement, 1997, Submission to the Committee of Public Accounts on National Audit Office Report on Aid to Indonesia, London: World Development Movement.